Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 2005. (Read 2761645 times)

If you hold many GOOD aliases then you could create such a service. People have to pay NXT to decide the URI of a few of those Aliases for a month. Good idea.

Very nice! I'm a major aliasholder and could not be happier with all these features!
Being able to put contact info would be good, although I personally would prefer that to be optional. I can imagine a scenario where I decide to keep some aliases for myself and not even want to negotiate. I would be unhappy with constant requests if I would sell, in that case.

I'm also thinking of a way to hire/rent out aliases, basically the way a domain now must be renewed every year. However, that constantly comes up against a huge trust wall where I can imagine someone would be wary of putting his redirect in my care. Can someone comment on that idea? Maybe it's just total crap.  

Brilliant! The Typeahead Go box!

I wanted to do something similar today as well, but didn't had the time.

What I wanna see is a register with ALL aliases. (Make Sections with A, B, C, D, ...) Also I wanna see a searchengine like your GO box. But I would like to enter some string and it will show me all aliases which contain this string. (URI AND Aliasname)

22k.io Alias Browser and URL Shortener
Now with alias typeahead!

I'm still hacking along with various fun features. One of these days I'll do something with the design, but I'm keeping it practical for the moment.

Alias account
A small, cool update: the account that owns an alias is now displayed on the "info" page. Example: http://22k.io/22k/info

Someone squat your name? Try this:

1. Visit http://22k.io/YOURALIASHERE/info/.
2. Grab the account number.
3. Search forums for the number and send them an offer PM (if you find it).

In the future, I'll work on some "standards" for naming aliases so you could find contact info for an account by looking at it's list of aliases for one containing "contact" in it's name.

Typeahead GO box!

1. Visit http://22k.io/
2. Type in a letter and watch in amazement as aliases appear.
3. Repeat #2.

MASSIVE time saver to check if a name is registered. Enjoy!

You'll be so productive that you can't help sending me some nxt to keep coding! 22k dev account: 4915862015826193000

Thanks! More ideas?

PS - This is just a demo server setup. Please don't kill it.

Authority doesn't simply show up usually. It slowly grow. Any kind of global voting (loser's votes go to trash; up to Murphy's law your opinion/point of view will be there for sure with some time) can push us in that direction.

I don't wanna rely on any people for just keeping my acc unfrozen in decentralized payment system. And u do?!

Another thing: for outside attack compromising system with help of VS can be relatively cheaper to 90%+ attack or DDoS or black PR.

Super! I added it on CoinArea.net as the main beginner video! (Get Started, point 1)

Good work! I'll send some of my NXT I obtained through forging your way

thanks


thanks

+ I thank to neer.g and Klee

And I thank to rickyjames and joefox for corrections, I still need to recover a little from the video marathon (Wiki translating actually isn't a vacation too ), but soon there will be corrected version + many other pieces of video art. So promotion donators/sponsors will be always welcomed 

Happy new year to you too

Two scenarios:

1) No VS. Like today no one can do nothing about someone else's NXT, only two options: hacking (of any type)/bruteforce. From hacking any sociaty'll be protecting each one and all — non-legit. And from potential single enemy (whole system still can collapse anytime, u can't get rid of risk) I financially defended until bruteforce-breakthrough is revealed (say, aliens),

2) VS here. At first step potential enemy can organize representative democracy: leader and driven people/coins, at second step manipulate 51%+ of leader's minds against someone else. Legit way.

Lack of decentralization.

Agree with "tea". For now for me it's unclear what the hell is that feature is really.

Well, not completely agree even with "tea", if I wanna choose tea for myself I'll look for spec-forum, I don't give a penny what a some billionare thinks of tea if I can't know is he spec or not. Money for voting only seems suitable in buisness: how to spend dividends (to which acc and how many)? And that's all. (I've nothing against some board with opinions in plain text proportional to wealth, but it'll be partitially non-useful info, cos specialism in anything doesn't stable correlate with wealth.)

could there be different paradigm for wealth / currency related voting and "Global Voting" ?
+for the one 51% stake majority makes absolutely sense.
+for the other it should be discussed if 51% stake holder is an option.

All of my VPSs have been up and running for 24 Hr+ so far. No weird sync issues or stuck blocks. No crashed Java processes either.

Oh I agree, if a voting system would allow for those features, I would vote to not allow the voting system. Who am I to say what other should do with their coins.

Now if the voting system would just allow us to vote on which tea is better: "Green or Earl Grey?" that I would vote for. Perhaps we can use the voting system to limit the voting system?

very nice thank you !

Pin

Exactly. And we can create that kind of power or can do not create it at all. Why should we? VS cann't overcome PoS+TF, but can hurt some stakeholders in future under diff. circ. No benefits I see so far.

nxt:explorer

So what? They'll be penaltied at forging. Forging = keeping network up, so it's completey reasonable. Why any other penalties'd be implemented?

IMO anyone can do anything he wants. PoS+TF defend system even against 90%+ inside-attack, there's no more defence required of any kind, I suppose (VS can nothing to do here to improve situation, 51% < 90%).

I read it the first time and my thoughts were "With Great Power comes Great Responsibility" from Spider Man. It would be so cool to have infinite block chains (or universes) to see how they can all play out.

I have been incognito for a few hours and I am already backlogged on more than 30 pages of posts..I will spend tonight catching up...I just want to say 2 things that may be of importance

1) People for the love of God...please in your proposals, DO NOT , I repeat DO NOT design schemes which would require intervention by a single entity at some critical point of the system...especially if that entity acts a validator into decentralized commerce. This is too much power for one person or group to control..This is akin to the concept of "coinvalidation" deciding of who and who not to approve to trade...All human trust has to be removed...no matter how altruistic seeming..Even Bcnext cannot be put in charge to approve and control...he will represent a single point of failure susceptible to a number of environmental, human or political pressures. Of course I am referencing the decentralized asset exchange but this can be applied to all other sub systems within...The solution is in the power of VOTING..you can approve or deny anything using the power of the unanimous stakeholders



2)Something just clicked...hindsight is 2020... on the subject of voting which is a very powerful feature, I recall CFB talking about using the ability to vote to destroy an individuals coins...Maybe this is BCnext fix to some of the huge (not all) stakeholders that refuse to get active and redistribute..For instance the community could propose a fair way and certain amount for these stakeholders to distribute (at a profit or not)  or risk their coins being destroyed..aside from the motivating effect this will also increase the value of all nxt. could this be a thought that crossed bcnxt's mind? CFB please comment