Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 2008. (Read 2761645 times)

legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
yeah, why destroy? freeze them and wait for the owner to present evidence he's innocent as a lamb or not or allow investigation of his node, or whatever, no need to destroy coins. And even freezing is too dictatorial. Banks do the same.

That's a dilemma - Should I keep a powerful weapon that can protect me, but can kill me.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I saw Voting System more like public signed polls. There're some tools of control of others accs planning with it? For what purpose?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Uha, that sound quite scary....if its possible to vote on something like that, dose that mean that the Nxt client already contains a command to destroy any amount of coins on any account?
If so, isn't it possible for some hacker to use this and kill Nxt?

It's not possible. Smiley
Destroying =/= destroing in common sense. This is just how defferent transactions on the blockchain r interpreted by client software.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Edit: Voting is a very dangerous tool, it should be used very carefully.
There'd bee high enough fee to rise only real big questions, right? And then, as I recall: plain text, voting, someone somewhere rewriting code to fit, updating of nodes. Or there're restirictions what about to vote (incomplete destroying, what? why not term "freezing")?

Anyone can create as many polls as they wish.
Destroying =/= freezing, there are differences, will be explained later.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Edit: Voting is a very dangerous tool, it should be used very carefully.
There'd bee high enough fee to rise only real big questions, right? And then, as I recall: plain text, voting, someone somewhere rewriting code to fit, updating of nodes. Or there're restirictions what about to vote (incomplete destroying, what? why not term "freezing")?

"freezing" sounds better

yeah, why destroy? freeze them and wait for the owner to present evidence he's innocent as a lamb or not or allow investigation of his node, or whatever, no need to destroy coins. And even freezing is too dictatorial. Banks do the same.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
One small deed will change future of millions of people...
May be write in white paper: what can you potentially do with Voting System and what can u do not? Anything giving a leak to control minds'd be keep outdoored, m? If Voting System'll be dangerous enough, I start recommendating to all to stay away, it's very important.
hero member
Activity: 695
Merit: 500
Without jokes with Voting Systen such thing become possible? How technically coins can be destroyed w/o free will of owner? "—"-transaction from Genesis-account or something like this or not at all?

And, Genesis account can do anything more powerful than all other accounts or not?

This is possible with Voting System. Someone creates a poll with description including proof and add an option to destroy coins / freeze account transactions / whatever. If 51% of all the coins choose to destroy coins then they r destroyed.

Genesis account can do nothing. Btw, when the time comes, the secret phrase that opens the genesis account will be published.

Uha, that sound quite scary....if its possible to vote on something like that, dose that mean that the Nxt client already contains a command to destroy any amount of coins on any account?
If so, isn't it possible for some hacker to use this and kill Nxt?
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
Edit: Voting is a very dangerous tool, it should be used very carefully.
There'd bee high enough fee to rise only real big questions, right? And then, as I recall: plain text, voting, someone somewhere rewriting code to fit, updating of nodes. Or there're restirictions what about to vote (incomplete destroying, what? why not term "freezing")?

"freezing" sounds better
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
we can always roll back the blockchain, right? Right?! Cheesy

Actually, coins destroyed this way can be un-destroyed. Voting just locks them for the time being.

good....will keep everyone in line.....and collective mistakes can also be undone.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Edit: Voting is a very dangerous tool, it should be used very carefully.
There'd bee high enough fee to rise only real big questions, right? And then, as I recall: plain text, voting, someone somewhere rewriting code to fit, updating of nodes. Or there're restirictions what about to vote (incomplete destroying, what? why not term "freezing")?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
we can always roll back the blockchain, right? Right?! Cheesy

Actually, coins destroyed this way can be un-destroyed. Voting just locks them for the time being.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
I do agree that there would need to be some SERIOUS guidelines for such a thing.

Right.



@all:

Guys, maybe u don't notice this, but we play very dangerous game here. One small deed will change future of millions of people...

we can always roll back the blockchain, right? Right?! Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
I do agree that there would need to be some SERIOUS guidelines for such a thing.

Right.



@all:

Guys, maybe u don't notice this, but we play very dangerous game here. One small deed will change future of millions of people...
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
This is possible with Voting System. Someone creates a poll with description including proof and add an option to destroy coins / freeze account transactions / whatever. If 51% of all the coins choose to destroy coins then they r destroyed.
But why we'd have such feature? Attacker'll need 90%+ coins under control to shutdown network, right? So why anyone'd care about 49%-?

Maybe we don't need such a feature. Let's vote on that? Wink
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
This is possible with Voting System. Someone creates a poll with description including proof and add an option to destroy coins / freeze account transactions / whatever. If 51% of all the coins choose to destroy coins then they r destroyed.
But why we'd have such feature? Attacker'll need 90%+ coins under control to shutdown network, right? So why anyone'd care about 49%-?

Or it's one of basics of Nxt: follow 51%+ ethics in your actions? It can be disaster in future.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
later we can vote on destroying all the coins that marked this rogue node, MUAHAHAHAHAHA
Without jokes with Voting Systen such thing become possible? How technically coins can be destroyed w/o free will of owner? "—"-transaction from Genesis-account or something like this or not at all?

And, Genesis account can do anything more powerful than all other accounts or not?

With currently 50 Accounts hold 75% of all coins this would be a huge flaw. Comments?

Why would killing rogue nodes be a huge flaw?

I think I understood it wrong. I can start a vote to delete all NXT from YOU. If I find a few guys supporting me from the original stakeholders it will happen. (?)
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
With currently 50 Accounts hold 75% of all coins this would be a huge flaw. Comments?

I doubt that these 50 accounts will commit suicide.

Edit: Voting is a very dangerous tool, it should be used very carefully.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Without jokes with Voting Systen such thing become possible? How technically coins can be destroyed w/o free will of owner? "—"-transaction from Genesis-account or something like this or not at all?

And, Genesis account can do anything more powerful than all other accounts or not?

This is possible with Voting System. Someone creates a poll with description including proof and add an option to destroy coins / freeze account transactions / whatever. If 51% of all the coins choose to destroy coins then they r destroyed.

Genesis account can do nothing. Btw, when the time comes, the secret phrase that opens the genesis account will be published.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
later we can vote on destroying all the coins that marked this rogue node, MUAHAHAHAHAHA
Without jokes with Voting Systen such thing become possible? How technically coins can be destroyed w/o free will of owner? "—"-transaction from Genesis-account or something like this or not at all?

And, Genesis account can do anything more powerful than all other accounts or not?

With currently 50 Accounts hold 75% of all coins this would be a huge flaw. Comments?
legendary
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
Which brings us on to the (irrelevant) question of who has the lowest/shortest active account ID? Best I could manage is: 21216510408.
Look in sig.  Grin I also have one 10 digits acc Tongue
Jump to: