NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 2031.

xyzzyx

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 250

I don't really come from outer space.

Quote from: ferment on December 29, 2013, 04:01:50 PM

Here are the URI schemes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI_scheme.

acct might be a better choice.

Based on the spec, the correct format would be "acct:5693933960808456307@nxt". Of course, we could leave the "@nxt" off and imply that an acct uri without a host is a NXT account. But, I think we should follow the spec so you could have aliases like "acct:ferment@bitcointalk".

God I hate those posts that quote a previous post and just add a "+1", but...

+1

ferment

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

IDEX - LIVE Real-time DEX

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 29, 2013, 09:56:58 AM

Quote from: getfun12345 on December 29, 2013, 09:55:15 AM

hi, i'm yueye000. Sorry made that mistake, how about "acc:5693933960808456307" ?

U r the 1st who implemented this feature, so u decide. Just make sure it's not reserved in URI standard. Ur decision will change the future.

Here are the URI schemes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI_scheme.

acct might be a better choice.

Based on the spec, the correct format would be "acct:5693933960808456307@nxt". Of course, we could leave the "@nxt" off and imply that an acct uri without a host is a NXT account. But, I think we should follow the spec so you could have aliases like "acct:ferment@bitcointalk".

GröBkAz

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 500

what could de bottom price before the next rise starts?

S3MKi

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1016

Quote from: zhangdu on December 29, 2013, 08:31:50 AM

Quote from: S3MKi on December 29, 2013, 08:26:22 AM

Quote from: S3MKi on December 28, 2013, 08:49:20 PM

Quote from: S3MKi on December 27, 2013, 05:27:22 AM

Please VOTE for Adding NxT @Cryptsy here
https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/44434
likes/comments

please donate me some NXT.

No.

utopianfuture

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 268

Internet of Value

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 29, 2013, 03:30:15 PM

Quote from: ZeroTheGreat on December 29, 2013, 03:18:01 PM

Hmm, in that case annual cleaning can create some problems, am I right? Big businesses creating plans for tens of years.

The shrinking doesn't erase all the data. Also Service Providers will keep all blockchains.

Hi Cfb, can we make a public announcement function in which a message can be broadcasted to the whole network. We may need this feature in case a certain public forum got shut down.

ZeroTheGreat

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on December 29, 2013, 03:52:31 PM

Quote

i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls.

Can anyone explain to me how that works? I understand the order book but I always just buy at market.

Someone do order with high volume at higher price and if there's enough demand to beat all lower-price deals, price go up for sure and stays till wall lives. Same with selling.

Any price-watchers'd keep in mind it means times less, if there's no stable big enough volumes are trading. Low volumes can do 50-200% previous price with no time. I suppose it can be second reason (to first as preventing spam) of setting a +/-30% boundary. To give time stakeholders to react and to not show something like -80%/+200% every next minute Grin

TwinWinNerD

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1001

CEO Bitpanda.com

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on December 29, 2013, 03:52:31 PM

Quote

i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls.

Can anyone explain to me how that works? I understand the order book but I always just buy at market.

If an stakeholder wants to sell an amount that moves the market (in todays orderbook that would be 250k+) then a market order would be bad for all parties. One should just set an sell order at a given price and wait for the market to absorb it.

bitcoinrocks

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Quote

i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls.

Can anyone explain to me how that works? I understand the order book but I always just buy at market.

S3MKi

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1016

nice price Grin

nxt to da ground?

ZeroTheGreat

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 29, 2013, 03:30:15 PM

Quote from: ZeroTheGreat on December 29, 2013, 03:18:01 PM

Hmm, in that case annual cleaning can create some problems, am I right? Big businesses creating plans for tens of years.

The shrinking doesn't erase all the data. Also Service Providers will keep all blockchains.

I see.

TwinWinNerD

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1001

CEO Bitpanda.com

im not so sure it is stakeholders that are selling.

The volume is quite low, and many bots are marketmaking the huge spreads. So it could be just random walk, but who knows, i for one enjoy the newfound prices Wink

brooklynbtc

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

AKA jefdiesel

I sunk 1 more Btc in today, bought all under 0.00006 so not bad. Thanks to the shareholders, or whoever is helping out with nice prices.

Anon136

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1217

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 29, 2013, 03:27:20 PM

Quote from: laowai80 on December 29, 2013, 02:55:22 PM

NXT is ahead of Namecoin on trade volume now, on #4 spot.

Looking at price I assume stakeholders r selling a lot of NXTs now Grin

thats what im thinking because its not as if interest is dying down, or ddos is winning, or terrible flaw is found, or faith is being lost. this development makes me very happy. this is coming from increased supply not reduced demand.

i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls.

Damelon

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1010

Quote from: yuriygeorge on December 29, 2013, 03:23:19 PM

My number is around 1000x, so that would mean a price of about .000021-.00004.

Stop waiting for the same price as I am! Wink

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: ZeroTheGreat on December 29, 2013, 03:18:01 PM

Hmm, in that case annual cleaning can create some problems, am I right? Big businesses creating plans for tens of years.

The shrinking doesn't erase all the data. Also Service Providers will keep all blockchains.

utopianfuture

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 268

Internet of Value

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 29, 2013, 03:27:20 PM

Quote from: laowai80 on December 29, 2013, 02:55:22 PM

NXT is ahead of Namecoin on trade volume now, on #4 spot.

Looking at price I assume stakeholders r selling a lot of NXTs now Grin

So far so good.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: pinarello on December 29, 2013, 03:24:59 PM

I have googled it ...

Shocked

https://www.dropbox.com/s/4hv7ghkaziuwf0b/CfB.jpg

Pin

ZeroTheGreat

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: yuriygeorge on December 29, 2013, 03:23:19 PM

I'll keep reminding potential new buyers of the information they may not have been able to obtain themselves - and the choice is up to them whether to buy or not.

Keep up a good work.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie