NXT was initially brought into circulation by 71 stakeholders who donated a total of 21 Bitcoins in exchange for a stake in the NXT genesis block which generated one billion NXT. In other words, all the NXT has already been mined
No thanks... another scamcoin?
so much for peer to peer! even frc is more democratic
So just because you did NOT trust your 1 BTC to support an idea that was presented publicly and would be open to the first 250 that would show interest it is a scam?
Maybe it is not a scam, but it is problematic. Because the success of something potentially beautiful is dependent upon stakeholders who are in a prisoners dilemma (Game theory).
Nxt currency distribution: NXT WAS NOT PRE-MINED, there is no such thing as mining in nxt. The initial nxt distribution process was completely fair and VERY PUBLIC! The public was advised to send bitcoin to the genesis address in exchange for NXT. Only about 71 people did so on time. These people paid fair and square to be in the position there are in. You could have been one too, but you were probably on another thread. ( If anyone has a better idea lets hear it). They were rewarded as the main starting founders and all NXT were distributed amongst them. It is now their prerogative and in their best interest to redistribute the funds as nxt is not as valuable if not accessible to the market. (And I was not one of the 71 by the way…why does it make sense to me and not you, please stop trolling) Please see all give away attempts :
You say the distribution was fair en transparent. Yes it was transparent. But fair? Maybe fair in the sense that the initial stakeholders really got their share of the 1 billion NXT. One should have been thinking of a fair method. Being transparent about the method doesn't make it a fair or good method. But as i understand from the reaction of CfB (see below)the creation of all coins at once is a necessity of a 100% PoS system.
Actually there is only 1 way to create a secure 100% PoS coin - issue all coins at once. If u subsidize block forging (like 25 BTC in Bitcoin now) then u make ur coin vulnerable to different types of attacks. The only way to fix this is to add proof-of-work which doesn't make sense in 100% PoS coin. Mathematical proof is very sophisticated and wasn't peer reviewed, so this statement may be wrong. U still could mention that if not all coins r premined then the currency may be vulnerable to attacks.
I am enthusiastic about NXT. But the initial distribution of the 1 billion NXT is problematic. We are not talking about a private company with 71 owners, but about a cryptocurrency for the benefit of mankind. Technology that will defeat exploitative systems like fiat currencies based on fractional reserve banking. These technological developments should lead to better forms of money in which income inequality through exploitation should become smaller not wider. I can't see how the chosen method for the distribution of the necessary 1 billion NXT is fair from this point of view. But i must admit that i do not have an alternative at the moment. Will be thinking about it. Were there any other alternatives considered?