Offer for NXT Node hosting and management...
For 5000 NXT, I'll setup and manage a node for 3 months. You send your hallmark and I'll do the rest including all the upgrades, etc.
For the equiv of about $20, that's a lot of work, but I want to see this technology succeed.
PM if interested.
-Ferm
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 2396. (Read 2761626 times)
Hi to all,
I have only few minutes, so I'll make it short.
I'm your average large stakeholder who cannot keep up with the client installations and updateds.
I don't have the time and the tech. knowledge to do that.
I'm not online most of the time for the time being, and this is the reason I said when Nxt started that I'm willing to donate a substantial amount of Nxt to share the burden.
So I'll say it again:
I'm willing to donate more than 3M nxt.
Lets open a fund that will be managed by respectable members that will be able to gurantee that the funds will be spent properly.
For every 2 Nxt that other stakeholders will donate - I'll donate 1 Nxt (3.4M max - already donated 0.4M to bybitcoin and 0.2M privately).
We need a Gavin - someone wants to step forward?
I have only few minutes, so I'll make it short.
I'm your average large stakeholder who cannot keep up with the client installations and updateds.
I don't have the time and the tech. knowledge to do that.
I'm not online most of the time for the time being, and this is the reason I said when Nxt started that I'm willing to donate a substantial amount of Nxt to share the burden.
So I'll say it again:
I'm willing to donate more than 3M nxt.
Lets open a fund that will be managed by respectable members that will be able to gurantee that the funds will be spent properly.
For every 2 Nxt that other stakeholders will donate - I'll donate 1 Nxt (3.4M max - already donated 0.4M to bybitcoin and 0.2M privately).
We need a Gavin - someone wants to step forward?
I can create a stakeholders giveaway forum in the nextcoin.org forums
...bunch of stuff...
what was that you said about there not being a contract between you and BCNext? so you can do as you please? Sounds like the same is true of BCNext (since there is not contract and all that jazz)
Finally managed to have the hallmark done and decoded correctly, after manually encoding all special characters.
I also did this once, and then decided nobody should have to do it manually. So here is a very simple html form one can use to generate hallmark, letting the browser take care of the encoding. No javascript tricks, plain old html. Save this file as nxt/webapps/root/markHost.html and then go to https://localhost:7875/nxt/markHost.html .Code:
Generate a Hallmark for your NXT node
Quote
Warning:
After doing this request, http://localhost:7874/nxt?requestType=markHost&secretPhrase=MY_SECRET&host=MY_HOST&weight=HOST_WEIGHT&date=CURRENT_DATE
your secret passphrase is stored in clear text in your browsing history! Remember to securely delete your browsing history after doing this task.
This warning is still valid. I tried to use POST instead of GET, but then I get a NullPointerException. Once this is fixed, the above form should be changed to use POST and the secretPhrase will not appear in the browser history.After doing this request, http://localhost:7874/nxt?requestType=markHost&secretPhrase=MY_SECRET&host=MY_HOST&weight=HOST_WEIGHT&date=CURRENT_DATE
your secret passphrase is stored in clear text in your browsing history! Remember to securely delete your browsing history after doing this task.
dude... did you seriously just solve the dynamic IP problem?
His disappearance and making it look like a scam was part of the agreement too?
Now, reading that he was going to follow Satoshi's footsteps, I think he was planning to disappear.
Anyway, "look like a scam" =/= "is scam".
I agree. I just say that due to this behaviour I missed my chance to become a stakeholder. And it's sad, cause I really like NXT.
EDIT: Hope he gives us another chance
How about if you, and all big shareholders perform another round of re-sharing NXT to all of us in exchange for BTC?
More crowd - more spread - more attribute - more success
"myAddress" must be exactly the same as returned by http://otherserver.com:7874/nxt?requestType=getMyInfo ("host" value). Such announced addresses as... [looks into peer list] ..."Sporadically Online" and "giantdildo" will be blacklisted.
Ok, that link returns an IP now. So if I want to have a custom (sub)domain name there instead of an IP, what would be the steps to take?
Setting a reverse DNS to a static IP and then setting myAddress to that rDNS value would do?
Sorry to bug you about this, just want to make clear once and for all.
"myAddress" must be exactly the same as returned by http://otherserver.com:7874/nxt?requestType=getMyInfo ("host" value). Such announced addresses as... [looks into peer list] ..."Sporadically Online" and "giantdildo" will be blacklisted.
Why would you blacklist people ?
Is there a pseudonym policy ?
EDIT : This link does not work : http://otherserver.com:7874/nxt?requestType=getMyInfo
His disappearance and making it look like a scam was part of the agreement too?
Now, reading that he was going to follow Satoshi's footsteps, I think he was planning to disappear.
Anyway, "look like a scam" =/= "is scam".
I agree. I just say that due to this behaviour I missed my chance to become a stakeholder. And it's sad, cause I really like NXT.
EDIT: Hope he gives us another chance
1. Node has incorrect hallmark set
2. Node responded with incorrect data or went offline
3. Node exceeded inbound request quotas (will be enabled in future versions)
4. Node is marked as zombie node by legit nodes (will be enabled in future versions)
Thank you and another quick question.
In web.xml can the myAddress param be set to anything arbitrary without hallmarking, or do these two params come together? Just want to have a custom nickname of the node in the list, is that the proper way to achieve that, by changing the myAddress param?
"myAddress" must be exactly the same as returned by http://otherserver.com:7874/nxt?requestType=getMyInfo ("host" value). Such announced addresses as... [looks into peer list] ..."Sporadically Online" and "giantdildo" will be blacklisted.
I for one didn't catch up the pre-sales train, but I bought a few as soon as people began to spread,
now i'm mining as possible as i can, and i try every new version and report bugs.
glad i can help a little
now i'm mining as possible as i can, and i try every new version and report bugs.
glad i can help a little
Now time for bad news.
Edit: If stakeholders don't change situation they should sell their coins before price drops below ZERO.
- such DUMP scheme, initiated right now by BCNext, is not good for Nxt. Because those, who believed in the Nxt, and bought some coins at a high price, would loose a lot now. And those, who are bying right now, are not a believers (after such words by BCNext), they are simply very risky traders.Edit: If stakeholders don't change situation they should sell their coins before price drops below ZERO.
if you think about things in terms of cause/effect, its a fantastic idea. in fact, itll even get WORSE.
Bravo.
1. Node has incorrect hallmark set
2. Node responded with incorrect data or went offline
3. Node exceeded inbound request quotas (will be enabled in future versions)
4. Node is marked as zombie node by legit nodes (will be enabled in future versions)
Thank you and another quick question.
In web.xml can the myAddress param be set to anything arbitrary without hallmarking, or do these two params come together? Just want to have a custom nickname of the node in the list, is that the proper way to achieve that, by changing the myAddress param?
His disappearance and making it look like a scam was part of the agreement too?
Now, reading that he was going to follow Satoshi's footsteps, I think he was planning to disappear.
Anyway, "look like a scam" =/= "is scam".
Lee gets my vote
CfB, what are the reasons for some nodes to appear in the Blacklist, even so called Well-known addresses? Short answer would suffice. Don't want to disrupt your coding, but just curious.
1. Node has incorrect hallmark set
2. Node responded with incorrect data or went offline
3. Node exceeded inbound request quotas (will be enabled in future versions)
4. Node is marked as zombie node by legit nodes (will be enabled in future versions)
Or at least perform another round for new stakeholders!
BCNext promised to launch cryptocurrency and reveal source code on the 3rd of Jan. But another round would be a violation of agreement.
His disappearance and making it look like a scam was part of the agreement too?
Give us a chance here
EDIT
PS: I was ready to invest, till he disappeared!!! And now I have to pay the initial price x1000?
CfB, what are the reasons for some nodes to appear in the Blacklist, even so called Well-known addresses? Short answer would suffice. Don't want to disrupt your coding, but just curious.
Or at least perform another round for new stakeholders!
BCNext promised to launch cryptocurrency and reveal source code on the 3rd of Jan. But another round would be a violation of agreement.
Btw, if any of the founders don't like the latest BCNext's statement they can sell me their NXTs at the initial rate (50M ~ 1 BTC) and leave the project without loss.
Edit: This is a time-limited offer.
Edit: This is a time-limited offer.
Me too!
Me too! my rate is 50m ~ 1.5-2 BTC.
Btw, if any of the founders don't like the latest BCNext's statement they can sell me their NXTs at the initial rate (50M ~ 1 BTC) and leave the project without loss.
Edit: This is a time-limited offer.
Edit: This is a time-limited offer.
Me too!
Me too!
Or at least perform another round for new stakeholders!
Jump to: