NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 266.

allwelder

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1004

Quote from: salsacz on March 18, 2014, 05:30:54 PM

What can you build for Nxt?

Nxt Facebook

Nxt Twitter

Nxt Email

Nxt Youtube

Nxt Blogspot

Nxt World of Warcraft

Nxt Ebay

Nxt Torrent

Nxt Kickstarter

Nxt Fiverr

...

Anything. Decentralized. Open source. Without government controll/censorship...

What about Nxt search ?

Eadeqa

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

From Nxt-e

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nxt-ecom-the-best-exchange-fast-stable-safe-multi-lang-521597

Quote

Deposit ANY amount of NXT, you'll get 500 more

bitcoinpaul

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: NxtMinnow on March 18, 2014, 08:09:56 PM

Create a new NXT Asset Exchange testnet account in 47 seconds. *New Video*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br4HEt_HbOY&feature=youtu.be

show your yubikey in the camera to better understand what you are doing maybe.

"and we are logged in" sounds great. let's make it a catch phrase for Nxt Grin

allwelder

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1004

create a new acc on testnet http://nxtra.org/nxt-client/
When I want to send out for the first time to produce public key,displayed:

Code:

Unknown account

cannot send out.
What is the matter?

Eadeqa

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: CIYAM on March 19, 2014, 12:36:58 AM

Quote from: Anon136 on March 19, 2014, 12:33:30 AM

I mean there wouldn't be anything wrong with having the name editable and that change would be stored on the blockchain. but it would be nice to have a general "notes" field that was stored locally. that would make it a lot more difficult for scammers to trick people with almost no cost.

Got it - although I would think that once you've decided on which AnonSilver you *trust* then you'd just get the client to *hide* any others with the same name (as it would be pretty unlikely that you are going to buy and sell more than one Asset of the same name).

Even if not hidden, buying untrusted assets could be rejected by the server. You won't mistakenly buy an asset if you have not manually added the issuer to the trust list.

Anon136

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1217

Quote from: CIYAM on March 19, 2014, 12:36:58 AM

Quote from: Anon136 on March 19, 2014, 12:33:30 AM

I mean there wouldn't be anything wrong with having the name editable and that change would be stored on the blockchain. but it would be nice to have a general "notes" field that was stored locally. that would make it a lot more difficult for scammers to trick people with almost no cost.

Got it - although I would think that once you've decided on which AnonSilver you *trust* then you'd just get the client to *hide* any others with the same name (as it would be pretty unlikely that you are going to buy and sell more than one Asset of the same name).

yes that sounds right to me. i doubt we will run into many situations where we have multiple legit assets with the same name. that would probably be a better solution than the ability to store notes for assets locally.

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: Anon136 on March 19, 2014, 12:33:30 AM

I mean there wouldn't be anything wrong with having the name editable and that change would be stored on the blockchain. but it would be nice to have a general "notes" field that was stored locally. that would make it a lot more difficult for scammers to trick people with almost no cost.

Got it - although I would think that once you've decided on which AnonSilver you *trust* then you'd just get the client to *hide* any others with the same name (as it would be pretty unlikely that you are going to buy and sell more than one Asset of the same name).

Anon136

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1217

Quote from: CIYAM on March 19, 2014, 12:29:40 AM

Quote from: Anon136 on March 19, 2014, 12:28:00 AM

important point to specify is that that field be stored locally not on the blockchain.

*edit* just to head of that argument before it even begins

Oh - in that case we are just talking about using localStorage or the like (so a client only thing).

Perhaps Wesley might add that in the same sort of way that he has implemented Contacts.

I mean there wouldn't be anything wrong with having the name editable and that change would be stored on the blockchain. but it would be nice to have a general "notes" field that was stored locally. that would make it a lot more difficult for scammers to trick people with almost no cost.

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: Anon136 on March 19, 2014, 12:28:00 AM

important point to specify is that that field be stored locally not on the blockchain.

*edit* just to head of that argument before it even begins

Oh - in that case we are just talking about using localStorage or the like (so a client only thing).

Perhaps Wesley might add that in the same sort of way that he has implemented Contacts.

Anon136

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1217

Quote from: CIYAM on March 19, 2014, 12:27:01 AM

JL has already made the changes so that Asset name is no longer "unique" and I think we should stick with that.

The idea of perhaps making the Description (or another new field) "editable" seems like a reasonable one for consideration.

important point to specify is that that field be stored locally not on the blockchain.

*edit* just to head of that argument before it even begins

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

JL has already made the changes so that Asset name is no longer "unique" and I think we should stick with that.

The idea of perhaps making the Description (or another new field) "editable" seems like a reasonable one for consideration.

opticalcarrier

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

how about increasing the number of digits used to identify assets? This coupled with the now non-unique "name" (I like to use the work description now, since they arent unique) should allow us to reduce the fee charged with issuing an asset.

I like the change to non-unique as it completely removes the idea of squatting

jl777

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1134

Quote from: Sebastien256 on March 18, 2014, 10:23:23 PM

Hey you know what would be important to be unique for asset!?!

I would make impossible for two assets to have the same name and description simultaneously. I mean name and description taken separatly can be non-unique but the full string asset.name+asset.description should be unique. This would avoid the need to always check the asset id before buying and the side effect to remove some of the spam copycat.
What you think about that?

too easy to workaround. The description can be quite long, any changed word would make it not be identical.

Many good ideas and suggestions!

James

Sebastien256

hero member

Activity: 715

Merit: 500

Hey you know what would be important to be unique for asset!?!

I would make impossible for two assets to have the same name and description simultaneously. I mean name and description taken separatly can be non-unique but the full string asset.name+asset.description should be unique. This would avoid the need to always check the asset id before buying and the side effect to remove some of the spam copycat.
What you think about that?

Sebastien256

hero member

Activity: 715

Merit: 500

Quote from: brooklynbtc on March 18, 2014, 10:01:52 PM

Quote from: Sebastien256 on March 18, 2014, 09:55:09 PM

Quote from: jl777 on March 18, 2014, 09:52:37 PM

Only numbers and letters are allowed in asset names currently,plus it is too long 10 char limit

Clearly, asset require an additional editable field with longer than 10char! If more than 10char cost space in blockchain, then make issue asset cost more than 1000nxt.

I think we're getting this mixed up.

ASSET names can not be longer than 10 chars at the moment. The description is a much longer space.

I agree the asset needs an editable field, just can't be the name or description.

YEs, thing got mix a bit. Cheesy

I don't know all the detail of AE.

So,at the moment, we are 3 that think that asset need an additional editable field . Maybe more will join and give his opinion on this subject. I think that would be a good addition before AE launch.

brooklynbtc

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

AKA jefdiesel

Quote from: Sebastien256 on March 18, 2014, 09:55:09 PM

Quote from: jl777 on March 18, 2014, 09:52:37 PM

Only numbers and letters are allowed in asset names currently,plus it is too long 10 char limit

Clearly, asset require an additional editable field with longer than 10char! If more than 10char cost space in blockchain, then make issue asset cost more than 1000nxt.

I think we're getting this mixed up.

ASSET names can not be longer than 10 chars at the moment. The description is a much longer space.

I agree the asset needs an editable field, just can't be the name or description.

allwelder

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Vega on March 18, 2014, 12:07:49 PM

Quote from: lumierre on March 18, 2014, 12:00:23 PM

Do you guys think that 100 BTC buy wall on bter is fake? (Yes/No/Probably)

Define fake.

But it is real deal and finished.

allwelder

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1004

Quote from: lucky88888 on March 18, 2014, 09:33:01 AM

i bought a lottery ticket, if i win big i will invest in nxt!
Grin

yea,good luck to you ,and then Nxt rocket... Cheesy

Sebastien256

hero member

Activity: 715

Merit: 500

Quote from: jl777 on March 18, 2014, 09:52:37 PM

Only numbers and letters are allowed in asset names currently,plus it is too long 10 char limit

Clearly, asset require an additional editable field with longer than 10char! If more than 10char cost space in blockchain,a solution would then make issue asset cost more than 1000nxt. imo, I don't think asset should be cheap.

jl777

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1134

Quote from: Anon136 on March 18, 2014, 09:12:33 PM

Quote from: jl777 on March 18, 2014, 08:07:15 PM

Just saw a really good idea on XCP forum:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5773807

It is about asset naming and it is very simple and I think quite effective.
Basically once you own an Asset Name, then you can create a subasset for a much lower fee. this essentially allows branding of the root name and then people will know that anything that starts with that is from the same issuer

So Anon gets his Anon136 asset name. Now he can issue:

Anon136.silver1oz
Anon136.silvershot
Anon136.silveretc

It still has a squatting issue with it, but now the squatters have to squat on the names of the issuers, not the target asset. This is far riskier as if a specific name is taken, there are always others that can be used. Unlike "BTC", which is unique.

If we are going to change the NXTcore for asset names, this one might be worth doing.

James

it could still collide if someone else registered Anon136.silver10z

Only numbers and letters are allowed in asset names currently,plus it is too long 10 char limit

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 266. (Read 2761645 times)