Yes of course some services like AM it can indexed per bytes but other
can be indexed per amount transacted
all AE like Cryptsy, BTC, Bitstamp use % amount transacted
We're going to reinvent the wheel?
why not?
what this clear that will be a lot more economical to maintain than BTC network or clones
NXT AE, is, by definition, 'reinventing the wheel'. You have to have a better reason than, 'thats the way its always been done'. The other argument is basing everything on size in the blockchain. Please argue your reason of % based with its own merits, or argue reasons against our suggestion.
must be distributed the cost of maintaining stimulated the "green, secure and decentralized network"
for example
Nxt% Fee per current transactions
Alias Fee services (For example per bytes)
Nxt% Fee per AE transactions
and so on ....
How The network is worth to maintain?
How many minimum nodes are needed?
How much electricity does it cost?
How many minimum transactions contemplated
with this you can calculate total nxt minimum expected
and another issue is how the fee is partitioneda transactions's fee should be tied to its byte size on the blockchain
ok its a posible solution but
you need to do this minimum operation
Total number of bytes expected divided by total nxt minimum expected by feesthen you can know
nxt per byte aplicableI do not know if this solution is the best but it can probably work. sharing may be quite right
