NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 401.

wesleyh

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

just an idea.. you know when you click on transactions then an address in transactions and this shows up

Account 4879225603217396121 Info
This account has a balance of 20'000 NXT.
Transactions
Assets
Aliases
Date   Type   Amount   Fee   Account
3/11/2014 15:48:53   Ordinary payment      5'000   5   You
3/11/2014 15:47:00   Arbitrary message      0   1   13641213266085296507
3/11/2014 15:45:47   Ordinary payment      10'000   10   13641213266085296507
3/11/2014 15:45:00   Ordinary payment      5'000   5   You

could you put a button saying send message to this acc instead of having to copy the address and then go to send message? and have it auto fill the address for you?

Your wish is my command:

PS: For those that had issues in Firefox private mode, that should be fixed too. Let me know!

bitcoinpaul

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

why such sell offs on bter?? its allot more so then normal..? is the asset exchange soon launching or something? would the whales be trying to off load some before the price goes up and ppl can buy less?

Yes, altruism all over the place Grin

bitcoinpaul

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on March 11, 2014, 12:42:57 PM

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 11, 2014, 12:12:16 PM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 12, 2014, 03:25:28 AM

Quote from: wesleyh on February 12, 2014, 03:17:31 AM

I'm waiting for an official sanctioned way by CFB on how to do local signing of transactions.

BCNext was delaying local signing to force ppl to install full nodes. I think we shouldn't wait longer and am going to implement prepareTransaction right after we launch Asset Exchange.

CfB, whats up with that?

Jean-Luc has almost finished this.

+1

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 11, 2014, 12:12:16 PM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 12, 2014, 03:25:28 AM

Quote from: wesleyh on February 12, 2014, 03:17:31 AM

I'm waiting for an official sanctioned way by CFB on how to do local signing of transactions.

BCNext was delaying local signing to force ppl to install full nodes. I think we shouldn't wait longer and am going to implement prepareTransaction right after we launch Asset Exchange.

CfB, whats up with that?

Jean-Luc has almost finished this.

wesleyh

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 11, 2014, 12:41:09 PM

Quote from: rdanneskjoldr on March 11, 2014, 12:37:32 PM

@wesleyh

Is there no kind of notification,for when users receive a message,or are transferred an asset,and those kind of things?
I miss a notifications tab.

Nice. A 'transaction' history / notification for messages, assets and so on.

Transaction history already exists. Sidebar > transactions. What's different about your approach? Btw, you can filter by type, see dropdown in right side of transactions page.

wesleyh

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: rdanneskjoldr on March 11, 2014, 12:37:32 PM

@wesleyh

Is there no kind of notification,for when users receive a message,or are transferred an asset,and those kind of things?
I miss a notifications tab.

Will be done later.

bitcoinpaul

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: rdanneskjoldr on March 11, 2014, 12:37:32 PM

@wesleyh

Is there no kind of notification,for when users receive a message,or are transferred an asset,and those kind of things?
I miss a notifications tab.

Nice. A 'transaction' history / notification for messages, assets and so on.

bitcoinpaul

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

*tumble weed rolls by*

I loled.

rdanneskjoldr

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

@wesleyh

Is there no kind of notification,for when users receive a message,or are transferred an asset,and those kind of things?
I miss a notifications tab.

bitcoinpaul

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 12, 2014, 03:25:28 AM

Quote from: wesleyh on February 12, 2014, 03:17:31 AM

I'm waiting for an official sanctioned way by CFB on how to do local signing of transactions.

BCNext was delaying local signing to force ppl to install full nodes. I think we shouldn't wait longer and am going to implement prepareTransaction right after we launch Asset Exchange.

CfB, whats up with that?

barbierir

hero member

Activity: 515

Merit: 502

Quote from: opticalcarrier on March 11, 2014, 10:16:36 AM

FORUMS.NXTCRYPTO.ORG users:

Adminius over there is btc24 here. Seems to have just completely vanished, hit by a bus, something, whatever. Last login on either site was end of January. Not responding to any of my PMs on either site. Im not sure as to how long his equipment is paid up for - what happens if 1 day its just shut off? So do we wait for that day or do we try to do something now?

This extended absence coupled with the fact that we still have no email password recovery coupled with the fact that we still experience unknown reasons for logouts gives me reason to post here and ask the community what are the thoughts? I will post this on the forums as a vote.
https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=865

If we want to migrate elsewhere, does anyone have any forums hosting they know we can use? I can change the DNS A record for forums.nxtcrypto.org to be whatever IP address whenever it needs to change.

Community vote. Or maybe btc24 comes back.

This forum is already functional and quite active:
https://nextcoin.org/index.php

Tobo

hero member

Activity: 763

Merit: 500

Quote from: msin on March 11, 2014, 11:39:36 AM

Someone should take the lead in launching Parallel Blockchain (NXG) CFB has offered his expertise and help in doing this and it will benefit development of several current projects; NxtCash, X-Chain Transactions, etc... I don't have the technical know how, but would suggest ChuckOne, Chanc3r, Zahlen.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5600243

Also, please register at CIYAM.org to follow AT progress and give your input.

FYI:
I asked Ian a question about his site (CIYAM.org). here is Q and A:

Q: Your site (ciyam.org) has been contently crashed and users are not able to either log in or introduce themselves. It seems that the traffic suddenly become too big to handle by the site.

A: There is a bug that I will fix tomorrow that has caused the problem - it is nothing to do with traffic.

The problem is having a user name with spaces (I thought I'd already fixed it but it seems I missed a spot).

jl777

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1134

Can someone really pound on nodeminer? I was expecting some bugs, a server crash, something.
Maybe I offer some bounty for bugs, but it is so young, it shouldnt be hard to find bugs.
Free nodecoins if you can hack the "mining" algo

James

https://github.com/jl777/multigateway

NxtMinnow

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

You can review the info here https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,797.0.html

I have had a rock solid experience (zero Force Closes) using this client. You can select which node you want to use and watch any account. I think at the end of the day, you are trusting the node you specify to connect to that is running Nxt NRS. I do not know if SSL is used for the connection to the specified Nxt NRS node, but it should be if it isn't! At the end of the day; if you are running a light client, you still have to trust someone in your network. Obviously local signing is preferable to remove that need to trust someone in your network.

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 11, 2014, 11:26:29 AM

Quote from: NxtMinnow on March 11, 2014, 11:02:52 AM

l8orre,

Thank you for responding. That Android client is a gem and yeuye000 released the source code to the community.

That Android client needs to be developed ASAP for Nxt to maximize it's potential.

I mean, right now. All it really needs is GUI re-skinned and re-colored and 1 spelling error fixed;
And the code reviewed / updated / security review.

I'm no coder yet. But I do know my way around computers and networks.

I need a coder's interest to help with that Android client and I can help support the project and put together a proposal for Nxt Infrastructure Committee.

A functional good looking android client would be huge. How does this client actually work? Since we have no local signing yet, I wonder how the client works securely.

bitcoinpaul

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 11, 2014, 11:26:29 AM

A functional good looking android client would be huge. How does this client actually work? Since we have no local signing yet, I wonder how the client works securely.

?

Tobo

hero member

Activity: 763

Merit: 500

Quote from: BrianNowhere on March 11, 2014, 11:26:16 AM

To wesleyh and/or Come-From-Beyond (most likely the latter)

just my .5 nxt but In my most humble opinion, charging a fee for placing a buy or sell order has the
strong potential to be a deal breaker for many many people who trade.

No other exchange charges a fee for placing an order that may or may not go through and it's common practice for people to use buy and sell orders strategically, such as whales and their psychological maneuver using the order book to intimidate or elicit a hoped for buy or sell reaction. Sure whales can afford the fee but for many this will be a matter of principle and they'll go elsewhere.

Even regular people might put in a somewhat ridiculous limit order, just in case there's a quick spike in price. When the gambit doesn't work and the price moves even further away, you cancel the order. People are going to be pissed getting charged a fee for that.

These kinds of behaviors are important to people who trade.

Also, Ripple (a main competitor) has no fee (or an infinitesimal one) for trading even when the order goes through.

Any way to either eliminate the fee for trades, make them very very tiny (similar to Ripple) or at the very least only
charge the fee when the order goes through?

I am really hoping that this is considered and that it's not another thing that's "impossible" with NXT infrastructure.

If i am not wrong, the fee is small and it is for anti-spam purpose. Blockchain is not like centralized database and it can not be very big. It is a trade off.

zorke

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: bidji29 on March 11, 2014, 11:45:20 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on March 11, 2014, 11:36:21 AM

Wait a sec. The two account numbers in the email from DGEX aren't mine. This is my first DGEX withdrawal and I've only ever deposited BTC there before. What's going on?

Seems like your account got hacked.
Fortunately, DGEX stopped them with their verification system.

You should say to them that those account are not yours, and change your password

Yes do this ASAP!

jl777

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1134

Quote from: BrianNowhere on March 11, 2014, 11:26:16 AM

To wesleyh and/or Come-From-Beyond (most likely the latter)

just my .5 nxt but In my most humble opinion, charging a fee for placing a buy or sell order has the
strong potential to be a deal breaker for many many people who trade.

No other exchange charges a fee for placing an order that may or may not go through and it's common practice for people to use buy and sell orders strategically, such as whales and their psychological maneuver using the order book to intimidate or elicit a hoped for buy or sell reaction. Sure whales can afford the fee but for many this will be a matter of principle and they'll go elsewhere.

Even regular people might put in a somewhat ridiculous limit order, just in case there's a quick spike in price. When the gambit doesn't work and the price moves even further away, you cancel the order. People are going to be pissed getting charged a fee for that.

These kinds of behaviors are important to people who trade.

Also, Ripple (a main competitor) has no fee (or an infinitesimal one) for trading even when the order goes through.

Any way to either eliminate the fee for trades, make them very very tiny (similar to Ripple) or at the very least only
charge the fee when the order goes through?

I am really hoping that this is considered and that it's not another thing that's "impossible" with NXT infrastructure.

This is why we need to go to .01 NXT, at that price it probably wont be much of an issue. Also, this is why I think overall forging revenues will go UP when we reduce the min tx fee. Elasticity of demand based on price

bidji29

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on March 11, 2014, 11:36:21 AM

Wait a sec. The two account numbers in the email from DGEX aren't mine. This is my first DGEX withdrawal and I've only ever deposited BTC there before. What's going on?

Seems like your account got hacked.
Fortunately, DGEX stopped them with their verification system.

You should say to them that those account are not yours, and change your password

l8orre

legendary

Activity: 1181

Merit: 1018

Quote from: NxtMinnow on March 11, 2014, 11:02:52 AM

l8orre,

Thank you for responding. That Android client is a gem and yeuye000 released the source code to the community.

That Android client needs to be developed ASAP for Nxt to maximize it's potential.

I mean, right now. All it really needs is GUI re-skinned and re-colored and 1 spelling error fixed;
And the code reviewed / updated / security review.

I'm no coder yet. But I do know my way around computers and networks.

I need a coder's interest to help with that Android client and I can help support the project and put together a proposal for Nxt Infrastructure Committee.

Hey NxtMinnow - gotta run, fetch my wife from the train - I'll PM you later,
Cheers,
l8orre

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 401. (Read 2761638 times)