"Selfish miners (those who mine only to earn fees) should be "removed" from the system"
How?
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 981. (Read 2761629 times)
I like BCNexts ideas and am very curious how they will work out. Especially how "real coins" are created on top of Nxt.
The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
NICE....Nxt is an idea/paradigm shift.
Not sure it's nice for those who expect to become rich and buy an island... The 1st red flag was when BCNext said that "world with money can't be perfect". Now he says that nxts r not money. I like these ideas but most of the community don't, IMO.
Edit: Well, we have an option not to follow his plan...
So what now? Panic sell? Because NXT will not be worth 1$ anymore? =)
Why not?
So what now? Panic sell? Because NXT will not be worth 1$ anymore? =)
I still think that NXT will be worth 1$. Dunno why u think it won't.
The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
NICE....Nxt is an idea/paradigm shift.
Not sure it's nice for those who expect to become rich and buy an island... The 1st red flag was when BCNext said that "world with money can't be perfect". Now he says that nxts r not money. I like these ideas but most of the community don't, IMO.
Edit: Well, we have an option not to follow his plan...
The concept is what I find amazing....this "thing" is looking more & more like a social engineering experiment as time goes by.
EDIT: I'm afraid to see the 3rd part of BCNext's Plan....
The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
NICE....Nxt is an idea/paradigm shift.
Not sure it's nice for those who expect to become rich and buy an island... The 1st red flag was when BCNext said that "world with money can't be perfect". Now he says that nxts r not money. I like these ideas but most of the community don't, IMO.
Edit: Well, we have an option not to follow his plan...
So what now? Panic sell? Because NXT will not be worth 1$ anymore? =)
The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
"Selfish miners (those who mine only to earn fees) should be "removed" from the system"
All stakeholders must dump.. Now... :p
Hell, my bitcoins r still being mixed. Can't place an order to buy NXT.
The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
"Selfish miners (those who mine only to earn fees) should be "removed" from the system"
All stakeholders must dump.. Now... :p
The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
NICE....Nxt is an idea/paradigm shift.
Not sure it's nice for those who expect to become rich and buy an island... The 1st red flag was when BCNext said that "world with money can't be perfect". Now he says that nxts r not money. I like these ideas but most of the community don't, IMO.
Edit: Well, we have an option not to follow his plan...
The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
Advocating paragraph: "Transparency extended to absolute leads to inability to cheat thus removing necessity to think if someone should trust another one.", I think you should add the option to cancel a transaction, "even at the cost of losing the fee!" The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
NICE....Nxt is an idea/paradigm shift.
The 2nd part of BCNext's plan - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-2-or-what-part-of-legacy-should-be-left-behind-458036
People, wake up! jl777 is exactly the kind of guy Nxt needs to go beyond what it is now. We need thinkers and visionary.
I don't think that anyone here has a problem with his ideas - the frustration that myself and some others have had has been in communicating with James about just "how" to do things (rather than "why" do them).
If I understand correctly, the problem is this monstrous thread where you cannot discuss different topics deeply without becoming crazy. Let us use the wiki for in-depth discussions.
+1
+1
+1
I have a great idea!
They could do a button or API function to cancel a transfer before the 800 confirmations (half the 1440 maturity)??
this could be very useful in cases of hacking of accounts or simply because the user has repented.
I think it's very possible, you just have to create the function.
Please! would be a great feature!
Regards!
They could do a button or API function to cancel a transfer before the 800 confirmations (half the 1440 maturity)??
this could be very useful in cases of hacking of accounts or simply because the user has repented.
I think it's very possible, you just have to create the function.
Please! would be a great feature!
Regards!
I think this is bad. Later, by sending transaction to the next forging trusted node, you want instant transactions. This wouldn't be possible with your idea, would it?
So if the transaction is canceled before the 1440 confirmations, forging could too.
800 confirmations although I think it would be more convenient.
People, wake up! jl777 is exactly the kind of guy Nxt needs to go beyond what it is now. We need thinkers and visionary.
I don't think that anyone here has a problem with his ideas - the frustration that myself and some others have had has been in communicating with James about just "how" to do things (rather than "why" do them).
If I understand correctly, the problem is this monstrous thread where you cannot discuss different topics deeply without becoming crazy. Let us use the wiki for in-depth discussions.
+1
+1
+1, jl777 has some good ideas!
People, wake up! jl777 is exactly the kind of guy Nxt needs to go beyond what it is now. We need thinkers and visionary.
I don't think that anyone here has a problem with his ideas - the frustration that myself and some others have had has been in communicating with James about just "how" to do things (rather than "why" do them).
If I understand correctly, the problem is this monstrous thread where you cannot discuss different topics deeply without becoming crazy. Let us use the wiki for in-depth discussions.
+1
+1
+1, jl777 has some good ideas!
NOW, signing is actually:
v * temp, where temp is related ONLY to PUBLIC key. (v is dependent ONLY on the data)
...
(whatever old one leaks is up to you, I know it doesn't, cause it's NOT related directly to private key)
v * temp, where temp is related ONLY to PUBLIC key. (v is dependent ONLY on the data)
...
(whatever old one leaks is up to you, I know it doesn't, cause it's NOT related directly to private key)
People, wake up! jl777 is exactly the kind of guy Nxt needs to go beyond what it is now. We need thinkers and visionary.
I don't think that anyone here has a problem with his ideas - the frustration that myself and some others have had has been in communicating with James about just "how" to do things (rather than "why" do them).
If I understand correctly, the problem is this monstrous thread where you cannot discuss different topics deeply without becoming crazy. Let us use the wiki for in-depth discussions.
+1
+1
I noticed that the client won't run correctly if your system-time is not perfectly synchronised.
Also the system-time seems to desynchronise on Windows when using memory intensive application.
I recommend using nistime-32bit.exe for Windows to synchronise correctly and regularly.
Also the system-time seems to desynchronise on Windows when using memory intensive application.
I recommend using nistime-32bit.exe for Windows to synchronise correctly and regularly.
Jump to: