Author

Topic: Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments - page 898. (Read 1234285 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
i think you know the current size of the entire Byteball database, do you? because i still was not able to install a full wallet i don't know. thank you.
It is about 650MB right now.

Witnesses get the transaction fees, my full node wallet hasnt received any meaningful amount of fees.

thank you. i hope that i will be able so set up a full wallet on my raspberry as soon as i am back home an have access to it. but i have to admit, that i am a GUI-user and have to learn a lot.

to set up a full wallet. do i need to follow these steps?
https://github.com/byteball/byteball
i tried it with my macbook. but i was not able to launch the wallet.
i struggled here:
Quote
Then run Byteball desktop client:

/path/to/your/nwjs/nwjs


Or is this all only for building the light wallet?

i feel a bit ashamed to ask these questions....

No need to feel ashamed this is new to many here me too.

Ive seen someone mention writing a guide on running these components, relay hub witness and headless wallet, get in touch with them they are on slack, even just getting input from you what happens when you follow the guide would be very helpful.

Yes, the byteball/byteball is for building the full and light wallets and can build android app.

You can use on raspberry pi byteball/byteball-relay or -hub of you want to help the network. Headless-byteball if you want to send payments programmatically and also help network.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
i think you know the current size of the entire Byteball database, do you? because i still was not able to install a full wallet i don't know. thank you.
It is about 650MB right now.

Witnesses get the transaction fees, my full node wallet hasnt received any meaningful amount of fees.

thank you. i hope that i will be able so set up a full wallet on my raspberry as soon as i am back home an have access to it. but i have to admit, that i am a GUI-user and have to learn a lot.

to set up a full wallet. do i need to follow these steps?
https://github.com/byteball/byteball
i tried it with my macbook. but i was not able to launch the wallet.
i struggled here:
Quote
Then run Byteball desktop client:

/path/to/your/nwjs/nwjs

Or is this all only for building the light wallet?

i feel a bit ashamed to ask these questions....
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
It is about 650MB right now.

Witnesses get the transaction fees, my full node wallet hasnt received any meaningful amount of fees.

I'd like to see that poor soul who chooses you as a witness...
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
i think you know the current size of the entire Byteball database, do you? because i still was not able to install a full wallet i don't know. thank you.
It is about 650MB right now.

Witnesses get the transaction fees, my full node wallet hasnt received any meaningful amount of fees.
sr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 252
So what exactly do I have to do to receive the new bb and bytes. I have a linked byteball address. But I have sent some bytes away from it. Is it enough to have all my bytes today evening back in the linked byteball address?
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1096
So the utilization of witnesses to choose a main chain would make this a delegated tangle or DDAG.
So...  you do not read even tonich's answers?  Thank you for your valuable opinion.
Witnesses do not decide ordering of units.  Ordering is determined by the algorithm that looks back at the witnesses-authored units in the DAG.
hero member
Activity: 689
Merit: 507
Is there any exchange coming, other than cryptox ? I fear that exchanges wait for the last round of distribution before listing BB.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
i think you know the current size of the entire Byteball database, do you? because i still was not able to install a full wallet i don't know. thank you.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055
i scanned the white paper. but there is still one thing i don't get. who gets the transactions fees? probably this is explained in the tech-parts that i don't untderstand. can someone give me a hint please which pages i have to read.

AFAIK tx fees are spread among full wallet users and witnesses, don't know if this is mentioned in the whitepaper.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
i scanned the white paper. but there is still one thing i don't get. who gets the transactions fees? probably this is explained in the tech-parts that i don't untderstand. can someone give me a hint please which pages i have to read.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055
So to get it right, all GB's in my wallet (even this I bought and withdrawaled) and all linked BTC addresses in Wallet bot from round #1 (+ GB's from round #1) will participate in round #2. Is this kinda correct?

BTC addresses stay linked but you should consult the transition bot again if they still have a balance, because if you used one of those linked addresses in the meantime, their balance is probably moved to a change address.
The bytes in your wallet all receive the 0.1 new bytes, but for the new blackbytes you have to link one or more byte address. Simply follow the instructions of the transition bot.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055
Will bytes and blackbytes show up in wallet at the time of snapshot or will there be a period of time in between? If so, are we talking minutes, hours or days?

Thanks in advance

On round #1 it took about 24 hrs for the bytes and a bit longer for the blackbytes to show up.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055
  please support retweet. time to play in the Major Leagues    Wink   https://twitter.com/vasys174/status/829950592047075328     Make BYTEBALL Great Again    Cheesy

Good tweet, retweeted!

 Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1005
  please support retweet. time to play in the Major Leagues    Wink   https://twitter.com/vasys174/status/829950592047075328     Make BYTEBALL Great Again    Cheesy
member
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
Will bytes and blackbytes show up in wallet at the time of snapshot or will there be a period of time in between? If so, are we talking minutes, hours or days?

Thanks in advance
hero member
Activity: 1924
Merit: 538
Its like finding free money.

Kind of like what happened with ETC to all the pre-fork ETH holders...



a good occurence !
hero member
Activity: 573
Merit: 500
Bitcore BTX
So to get it right, all GB's in my wallet (even this I bought and withdrawaled) and all linked BTC addresses in Wallet bot from round #1 (+ GB's from round #1) will participate in round #2. Is this kinda correct?
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Its like finding free money.

Kind of like what happened with ETC to all the pre-fork ETH holders...

newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
So the utilization of witnesses to choose a main chain would make this a delegated tangle or DDAG.
member
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
how much are 65 mb in dollar atm?

Around five dollars. 1 GB is traded for between 0.07 and 0.08 BTC, 1 GB = 1000 MB, I'll let you do the math Wink.

and i have a question about the wallet.
i have a jaxx wallet and the amount of my btc are saved in different adresses.
i heard that it is possible to sign the different wallets to one adress with the electrum wallet.
is this possible? i dont want to move all my bitcoins from a to b thats to risky with that amount and the different adresses for me.
i dont want to make any mistakes. can anybody help me out?

You can link multiple Bitcoin addresses to the same or to many Byteball addresses. On Electrum, you can import your Bitcoin addresses by using your private keys and then sign your Byteball address(es) as you wish.

Seems to be problematic with Jaxx i dont have any private keys for my btc adresses i dont even have any overview on which adresses my btc are
all this testing and moving cost me btc i think its not worth it when you have btcs in mulitply wallets.

If you have btc in a wallet where you don't own the private keys, I'd consider changing wallets.

If you have your seed, then that's your private key in essence. Why not mycelium? Much more stable.
Jump to: