somehow I feel like in the kindergarden...
There is a guy whom I kicked from Waves and Lisk threads, once I kick his sockpuppet from this thread the convo will be looking more mature.
Topic: Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments - page 932. (Read 1234271 times)
January 29, 2017, 04:24:00 PM
There is a guy whom I kicked from Waves and Lisk threads, once I kick his sockpuppet from this thread the convo will be looking more mature.
January 29, 2017, 04:20:44 PM
No I didnt delete it, but see its gone now.
Apparently you haven't seen
Hm, I wanted to make sure you understood what you were talking about. Judging by your reply, you have no clue at all and are just trolling. So I'm banning you from this thread. All further posts will be deleted.
You can continue playing "victim of censorship" card if you want to look stupid, it's your right.
January 29, 2017, 04:19:50 PM
somehow I feel like in the kindergarden...
January 29, 2017, 04:19:17 PM
It's for this reason that it is necessary to save completely the directory of the byteballs, not just seed
Yeah, but you must save it after each transaction lol. It's very hard and here can be some other problems. Like an empty balance... private assets, such as blackbytes, are stored only in the wallet (exactly because they are private) and get updated every time you send or receive a private asset.
To secure against loss of the wallet, I recommend that you use multisig. For example, 1-of-2 multisig with one wallet on the phone, the other on a desktop computer. This way, the private assets will be automatically copied to the two devices.
To secure against loss of the wallet, I recommend that you use multisig. For example, 1-of-2 multisig with one wallet on the phone, the other on a desktop computer. This way, the private assets will be automatically copied to the two devices.
Yep, but how does it help with problem of creating new address after transaction? I dont understand for sure.
After any transaction tip will go to new address in your wallet. To denied it you can:
1. Send money again from new address to your main (i didn't test that way)
2. Back up your data wallet.
January 29, 2017, 04:16:17 PM
So far, at least 1 non-founder-affiliated JavaScript developer (me) has gone through the code looking for obvious major mistakes and found none.
What is your expertise in this area? Noone questions Todd's one, but yours is unknown.
I've just seen your interesting post on "the other thread". Was it censored or did you delete it yourself?
January 29, 2017, 04:12:04 PM
I've just seen your interesting post on "the other thread". Was it censored or did you delete it yourself?
I'm deleting his posts in that thread without reading.
January 29, 2017, 04:10:27 PM
My skill-level in JavaScript and general cryptography is as high as your skills in threatening and stalking me and other people for asking inconvenient questions about your latest scam project after your failed NXT - IOTA. Thats how much expertise. Much wow such exeprtise.
You keep evading valid questions by distracting from the matter. I'm thinking of changing your neutral trust rating to negative, your behavior raises too many red flags.
PS: My question still stands.
January 29, 2017, 04:10:22 PM
So far, at least 1 non-founder-affiliated JavaScript developer (me) has gone through the code looking for obvious major mistakes and found none.
What is your expertise in this area? Noone questions Todd's one, but yours is unknown.
I've just seen your interesting post on "the other thread". Was it censored or did you delete it yourself?
January 29, 2017, 04:08:40 PM
how to check which BTC address received BB and how much? where is that list?
also i noticed I did not get blackbytes only bytes? how is this possible? is it because I had to update the bb wallet because the old one would not sync?
also i noticed I did not get blackbytes only bytes? how is this possible? is it because I had to update the bb wallet because the old one would not sync?
The stats for round 1 are here: http://transition.byteball.org/firstround.html
Please update to the latest wallet 1.1.1, maybe you still get your Blackbytes. If not, please go to the #helpdesk channel in our slack and we'll have a look at your issue.
January 29, 2017, 04:07:07 PM
So far, at least 1 non-founder-affiliated JavaScript developer (me) has gone through the code looking for obvious major mistakes and found none.
What is your expertise in this area? Noone questions Todd's one, but yours is unknown.
EDIT: LOL. I got enough expertise to have my posts in your dumb IOTA thread being deleted. Just for pointing out technical flaws in your shit coin. Stop fooling people and do something good in your life. Now Ill just /ignore you.
January 29, 2017, 03:57:23 PM
So far, at least 1 non-founder-affiliated JavaScript developer (me) has gone through the code looking for obvious major mistakes and found none.
What is your expertise in this area? Noone questions Todd's one, but yours is unknown.
January 29, 2017, 03:53:48 PM
If that is not enough, here are more seditious words: "blackbyte", "bad distribution", "better than iota", "very similar to iota", "actually the same" 
.
. This post reminded me to ask: Was there a peer review of "private untraceable payments"* claim?
---
* - taken from the title
I proposed similar idea in bitcoin-dev mailing list and it was discussed there. One of the responses is from Peter Todd https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-August/012956.html, see others too.
Also there was a technical discussion at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hiding-entire-content-of-on-chain-transactions-1574508 and https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hash-based-confidential-txn-chains-1298588
January 29, 2017, 03:48:52 PM
People selling now at more than 0.05 price are gonna regret it when bytes are more worth than bitcoin.
Blackbytes with tor is even better than monero and zcash, because byteball scales better.
Blackbytes with tor is even better than monero and zcash, because byteball scales better.
Also, zcash so anonyme, that we can't know for sure how many coins exist. Zcash has premine (or presale, as you like)
And it very speculative and have weak development (in my opinion).
Monero it's project of Poloniex.
Byteball, with blackbytes and tor, is pure gold. It will evolve and still be in use for at least the next +25 years. Because, it is so damn simple, yet so elegant, fulfills all these "anonymous/private/untraceable transactions with anti-spam" and just works.
January 29, 2017, 03:44:56 PM
how to check which BTC address received BB and how much? where is that list?
also i noticed I did not get blackbytes only bytes? how is this possible? is it because I had to update the bb wallet because the old one would not sync?
also i noticed I did not get blackbytes only bytes? how is this possible? is it because I had to update the bb wallet because the old one would not sync?
January 29, 2017, 03:31:07 PM
If that is not enough, here are more seditious words: "blackbyte", "bad distribution", "better than iota", "very similar to iota", "actually the same" .
. This post reminded me to ask: Was there a peer review of "private untraceable payments"* claim?
---
* - taken from the title
I proposed similar idea in bitcoin-dev mailing list and it was discussed there. One of the responses is from Peter Todd https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-August/012956.html, see others too.
Also there was a technical discussion at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hiding-entire-content-of-on-chain-transactions-1574508 and https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hash-based-confidential-txn-chains-1298588
January 29, 2017, 03:05:30 PM
Any idea why this is happening?! Worked before (connected my BTC adress)... using 1.1.1
Please right click and select both "Inspect" and "Inspect background page". Send me what you see in the Console.
Uncaught Error: More than one instance of bitcore-lib found. Please make sure to require bitcore-lib and check that submodules do not also include their own bitcore-lib dependency.
Secp256k1 bindings are not compiled. Pure JS implementation will be used.
Please make sure that the program is started from "C:\Program Files", not "c:\Program Files" (with capital C). If it is not, edit the paths on the start icon. There is one oddity in how node.js works on Windows.
Worked, thank you!
January 29, 2017, 02:58:44 PM
Any idea why this is happening?! Worked before (connected my BTC adress)... using 1.1.1
Please right click and select both "Inspect" and "Inspect background page". Send me what you see in the Console.
Uncaught Error: More than one instance of bitcore-lib found. Please make sure to require bitcore-lib and check that submodules do not also include their own bitcore-lib dependency.
Secp256k1 bindings are not compiled. Pure JS implementation will be used.
Please make sure that the program is started from "C:\Program Files", not "c:\Program Files" (with capital C). If it is not, edit the paths on the start icon. There is one oddity in how node.js works on Windows.
January 29, 2017, 02:52:26 PM
It's for this reason that it is necessary to save completely the directory of the byteballs, not just seed
Yeah, but you must save it after each transaction lol. It's very hard and here can be some other problems. Like an empty balance... private assets, such as blackbytes, are stored only in the wallet (exactly because they are private) and get updated every time you send or receive a private asset.
To secure against loss of the wallet, I recommend that you use multisig. For example, 1-of-2 multisig with one wallet on the phone, the other on a desktop computer. This way, the private assets will be automatically copied to the two devices.
To secure against loss of the wallet, I recommend that you use multisig. For example, 1-of-2 multisig with one wallet on the phone, the other on a desktop computer. This way, the private assets will be automatically copied to the two devices.
Interesting, will it work if one of the devices is offline?
Yes.
January 29, 2017, 02:32:27 PM
Any idea why this is happening?! Worked before (connected my BTC adress)... using 1.1.1
Please right click and select both "Inspect" and "Inspect background page". Send me what you see in the Console.
Uncaught Error: More than one instance of bitcore-lib found. Please make sure to require bitcore-lib and check that submodules do not also include their own bitcore-lib dependency.
Secp256k1 bindings are not compiled. Pure JS implementation will be used.
January 29, 2017, 02:15:44 PM
Any info on who the twelve validating witnesses are atm? I'm assuming they're just twelve servers being run by tonych, but curious if there is any more info available.
You are right I'm still running all 12 witnesses myself.
You shouldn't say "validating witnesses" - witnesses are validating exactly as much as any other full node.
Thanks for clarifying. Just out of curiosity, how much fees are you collecting per day in payload commission at this point?
How will this change going forward regarding the witnesses? I mean in the selecting of the 12, how long do you plan to carry the whole network?
So if I understand correctly the witnesses are the ones who receive the payload commissions for each transaction.
Where can we find the info on how much commission are being generated for each transaction?
What about the headers commissions where can we find this for each transaction?
You can see all fees in the explorer https://explorer.byteball.org
Jump to: