Pages:
Author

Topic: OddsWorthBetting Premium Membership Picks - page 2. (Read 2975 times)

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 05, 2015, 12:10:45 AM
#52
Just had another correct pick on Alexandr Dolgopolov tonight!


Updated here  Grinhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13TZkKMskD_AI6foowmgsf_JwPT71MZ5V-si3VnrGZis/edit#gid=0
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 04, 2015, 02:15:10 PM
#50
Matches coming on soon, excited to see how it goes
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 04, 2015, 10:08:46 AM
#49
Lets see how todays picks go!  Grin
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 04, 2015, 12:28:41 AM
#48
i have see you doc spreadsheets only 3 match you post and why im not see odds winning  in your correct prediction

As stated before, i will start adding odds to the correct predictions.  Kiss
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
The most Professional Cryptocurrency Casino
August 04, 2015, 12:23:50 AM
#47
i have see you doc spreadsheets only 3 match you post and why im not see odds winning  in your correct prediction
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 04, 2015, 12:15:19 AM
#46
Will start posting them on the Google Sheet  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
August 04, 2015, 12:01:12 AM
#45

thank you for being honest, but that spreadsheet is useless without odds and without the picks posted somewhere else publicly shortly after the game starts because you can change that.

As for what you have there. If you bet $100 on each game you would have won $40 on Isner, $119 on Baghdatis, and lost $100 on Lu, leaving you only up $59.

If you used the industry standard method of keeping track of bets (bet enough to win $100 on favorites, bet $100 on underdogs) you would have bet 250 to win 100 on Isner, 100 to win 119 on Baghdatis, and lost 175 trying to win 100 on Lu. Leaving you up $44 after risking $544. You may not like that method because it punishes you more for losing on heavy favorites, but real handicappers weight their record that way to give an accurate representation.

Yes thats a nice profit for a day. I will try and update who I pick while the match is in progress.

Picks for tomorrow are:

Dolgopolov, A v Smyczek, T Lacko, L vs Johnson, S
Bet M Baghdatis (win) against Pella

I misread my chart, you didn't have the +119 on baghdatis yet, so you are down for the day.

What odds are you getting on those picks. I can find them, but you should post them if you want to convince people you are honest.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 03, 2015, 11:29:56 PM
#44
Nobody is going to buy this unless you prove you have betting talent.

Which is what I'm trying to do Undecided
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
August 03, 2015, 11:25:57 PM
#43
Nobody is going to buy this unless you prove you have betting talent.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 03, 2015, 10:25:16 PM
#42

thank you for being honest, but that spreadsheet is useless without odds and without the picks posted somewhere else publicly shortly after the game starts because you can change that.

As for what you have there. If you bet $100 on each game you would have won $40 on Isner, $119 on Baghdatis, and lost $100 on Lu, leaving you only up $59.

If you used the industry standard method of keeping track of bets (bet enough to win $100 on favorites, bet $100 on underdogs) you would have bet 250 to win 100 on Isner, 100 to win 119 on Baghdatis, and lost 175 trying to win 100 on Lu. Leaving you up $44 after risking $544. You may not like that method because it punishes you more for losing on heavy favorites, but real handicappers weight their record that way to give an accurate representation.

Yes thats a nice profit for a day. I will try and update who I pick while the match is in progress.

Picks for tomorrow are:

Dolgopolov, A v Smyczek, T Lacko, L vs Johnson, S
Bet M Baghdatis (win) against Pella
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
August 03, 2015, 10:02:07 PM
#41

thank you for being honest, but that spreadsheet is useless without odds and without the picks posted somewhere else publicly shortly after the game starts because you can change that.

As for what you have there. If you bet $100 on each game you would have won $40 on Isner, $119 on Baghdatis, and lost $100 on Lu, leaving you only up $59.

If you used the industry standard method of keeping track of bets (bet enough to win $100 on favorites, bet $100 on underdogs) you would have bet 250 to win 100 on Isner, 100 to win 119 on Baghdatis, and lost 175 trying to win 100 on Lu. Leaving you up $44 after risking $544. You may not like that method because it punishes you more for losing on heavy favorites, but real handicappers weight their record that way to give an accurate representation.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
August 03, 2015, 09:11:06 PM
#39
I have specified what I want you to do many times.

Right after the game that you are betting on starts, post the pick here, with the odds you bet. This way we can keep track of your record AND how much money you win AND you won't be ripping off the people that paid for your picks.

That is how you prove you are good at sports betting, you post your picks, and prove that you can make money making picks.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 03, 2015, 08:22:26 PM
#38
Your proof is nothing.  You have no track record or recorded picks. There are already MANY websites and users here that are dedicated to buying/selling picks that have shown some sort of record of picks.

You're just trying to squeeze some BTC out of newbies before you abandon your account and make a new one to try the same thing.

BTW - if someone was a consistent winner. They wouldn't need to sell their picks for a measly $50.

Hey tool,

On cloudbet, the past history of all made bets are not appearing, i would be happy to put them..
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
August 03, 2015, 07:59:39 PM
#37
Your proof is nothing.  You have no track record or recorded picks. There are already MANY websites and users here that are dedicated to buying/selling picks that have shown some sort of record of picks.

You're just trying to squeeze some BTC out of newbies before you abandon your account and make a new one to try the same thing.

BTW - if someone was a consistent winner. They wouldn't need to sell their picks for a measly $50.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 03, 2015, 07:45:04 PM
#35
Sounds great!  ;)I'll definitly pick this one out!
I'm creating an account and taking my chances with 1 month free membership!


whaat? you are either really crazy to trade with a newbie by sending him first or you are a multiaccount of oddsworthbetting as no one trusts newbies on this forum

I should be trusted? I know what I'm doing you tool

That may be true, but it's very simple to show that you are good at sports betting. Your refusal to do so is a giant red flag.

All you have specified is me to post a picture, will I will do now!
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
August 03, 2015, 05:30:59 PM
#34
Sounds great!  ;)I'll definitly pick this one out!
I'm creating an account and taking my chances with 1 month free membership!


whaat? you are either really crazy to trade with a newbie by sending him first or you are a multiaccount of oddsworthbetting as no one trusts newbies on this forum

I should be trusted? I know what I'm doing you tool

That may be true, but it's very simple to show that you are good at sports betting. Your refusal to do so is a giant red flag.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 03, 2015, 03:30:24 PM
#33
Sounds great!  ;)I'll definitly pick this one out!
I'm creating an account and taking my chances with 1 month free membership!


whaat? you are either really crazy to trade with a newbie by sending him first or you are a multiaccount of oddsworthbetting as no one trusts newbies on this forum

I should be trusted, I know what I'm doing you tool
Pages:
Jump to: