Pages:
Author

Topic: ★★ >> Offering loan for everyone with and without collateral << ★★ - page 2. (Read 4873 times)

full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
I think you got offended without reason and you told me to check first when you actually did not check yourself. Smiley

I wrote to Quickseller, which is the user who gave the requesting user a red trust. I did not address you there. Wink
Ok no problem.
Sorry if i have been disapointing or agressive it was not the purpose Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
Repayment address: 15V9ZNTezDkQabQYbAeqDVsz3Ke6dPq2zb
Who sent you 996af90179b15ef630ffde5a1de4b9dbbcc5a837473c383ffab26b8c945ae4fd and why? It was sent to you on May 26 but I don't see any loans that match that date/amount/time
Some loan are make only by pm, anyway i don't see why i have to justified all my btc x)

By the way Quickseller, i don't think it is needed to give every newbie asking for a loan without collateral a negative trust. For example i see, that kdphilip75 wanted that loan for buying an account i sell for a user. It's probable that he did not know that a collateral is needed. But regardless of that, getting a red trust for that is not needed at all since why would you need to tell everyone that he wanted a loan without collateral? He would not get a loan anyway and everyone could see already that he did not offer collateral. Why you need to write that again as red trust is something i wonder about.

At least his request looks genuine for me since he only asked because i demanded that he prooves he has that much coins. His request would not have been successfull anyway.

Any other reason why you think that is needed? Even if you think he might move on and try to scam... you don't know it and a neutral warning might be sufficient.

No, i wasn't asked by him, i only noticed that he suddenly has red trust. Smiley
Hey nice to say it to me, but i don't give any red trust for it, so maybe next time check from who is the red trust.
If you are not blaming then it's ok.
I agree with you, giving redtrust only for asking is stupid so i never do it Wink
I just refuse the loan because he did not even took time to read my first post where i explain rules, so i really don't want to loan to these users ^^

I think you got offended without reason and you told me to check first when you actually did not check yourself. Smiley

I wrote to Quickseller, which is the user who gave the requesting user a red trust. I did not address you there. Wink
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
Repayment address: 15V9ZNTezDkQabQYbAeqDVsz3Ke6dPq2zb
Who sent you 996af90179b15ef630ffde5a1de4b9dbbcc5a837473c383ffab26b8c945ae4fd and why? It was sent to you on May 26 but I don't see any loans that match that date/amount/time
Some loan are make only by pm, anyway i don't see why i have to justified all my btc x)

By the way Quickseller, i don't think it is needed to give every newbie asking for a loan without collateral a negative trust. For example i see, that kdphilip75 wanted that loan for buying an account i sell for a user. It's probable that he did not know that a collateral is needed. But regardless of that, getting a red trust for that is not needed at all since why would you need to tell everyone that he wanted a loan without collateral? He would not get a loan anyway and everyone could see already that he did not offer collateral. Why you need to write that again as red trust is something i wonder about.

At least his request looks genuine for me since he only asked because i demanded that he prooves he has that much coins. His request would not have been successfull anyway.

Any other reason why you think that is needed? Even if you think he might move on and try to scam... you don't know it and a neutral warning might be sufficient.

No, i wasn't asked by him, i only noticed that he suddenly has red trust. Smiley
Hey nice to say it to me, but i don't give any red trust for it, so maybe next time check from who is the red trust.
If you are not blaming then it's ok.
I agree with you, giving redtrust only for asking is stupid so i never do it Wink
I just refuse the loan because he did not even took time to read my first post where i explain rules, so i really don't want to loan to these users ^^

Loan Amount : 0.03
Reason : Personal
BTC Address : 18bzij3abHnRh8FfFu6Ky39UckDJcDo9aZ
Term Length : 5 days
Sorry i did not see your post, if you still need a loan pm me Smiley
hero member
Activity: 675
Merit: 502
#SuperBowl50 #NFCchamps
Loan: 0.1 Btc
Reason : To buy A Grade A/c who is active in signature campaign with good reputation
Address: 32WULYAyeeErEZL38geNWoQsWmDXoihXvN
Term Length : 7 Days (signature payment waiting)

 Smiley Smiley
This is not going to protect the lender because he would have no way to recover the loan if you default, and the lender would have no way to force you to actually spend the money you receive on the loan to purchase an account.


It looks like SebastianJu wants to lend you this money though  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
By the way Quickseller, i don't think it is needed to give every newbie asking for a loan without collateral a negative trust. For example i see, that kdphilip75 wanted that loan for buying an account i sell for a user. It's probable that he did not know that a collateral is needed. But regardless of that, getting a red trust for that is not needed at all since why would you need to tell everyone that he wanted a loan without collateral? He would not get a loan anyway and everyone could see already that he did not offer collateral. Why you need to write that again as red trust is something i wonder about.

At least his request looks genuine for me since he only asked because i demanded that he prooves he has that much coins. His request would not have been successfull anyway.

Any other reason why you think that is needed? Even if you think he might move on and try to scam... you don't know it and a neutral warning might be sufficient.

No, i wasn't asked by him, i only noticed that he suddenly has red trust. Smiley
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
Loan: 0.1 Btc
Reason : To buy A Grade A/c who is active in signature campaign with good reputation
Address: 32WULYAyeeErEZL38geNWoQsWmDXoihXvN
Term Length : 7 Days (signature payment waiting)

 Smiley Smiley
Well, when people ask loan without reading my first post it's always making me laugh, especially with newbie.
Soooo, i won't lend you, find someone else.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Loan: 0.1 Btc
Reason : To buy A Grade A/c who is active in signature campaign with good reputation
Address: 32WULYAyeeErEZL38geNWoQsWmDXoihXvN
Term Length : 7 Days (signature payment waiting)

 Smiley Smiley
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Loan Amount : 0.03
Reason : Personal
BTC Address : 18bzij3abHnRh8FfFu6Ky39UckDJcDo9aZ
Term Length : 5 days
copper member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 2348
Repayment address: 15V9ZNTezDkQabQYbAeqDVsz3Ke6dPq2zb
Who sent you 996af90179b15ef630ffde5a1de4b9dbbcc5a837473c383ffab26b8c945ae4fd and why? It was sent to you on May 26 but I don't see any loans that match that date/amount/time
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
Loan of 0.05 Btc
Reason to purchase gift for wife
Term Length: 5 days
Address: 1HYakPDMTv88sTZgZ6hPaUBzWm2DEELFQz

Loan sended:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d078b9c30b73c8cd3894c01dc35819cff87c77c2fc36987146d591a09d57cfae

I am waiting your payment for thursday.
Amount to repay: 0.055BTC
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Loan of 0.05 Btc
Reason to purchase gift for wife
Term Length: 5 days
Address: 1HYakPDMTv88sTZgZ6hPaUBzWm2DEELFQz
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
After a few weeks (i was in holiday) i am now back on bitcointalk and i have some stock to loan.
Contact me here on with a PM Smiley
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 100+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Loan of 0.15 btc
Reason buying friend a gift on purse
Btc address 1AmvY2FJ1to6ru7Fuh4fEc91ozqHijrRg2
Term length 7days
Collertal hide my ass account with 6montg subscription and auto renew
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
All collateral should be held by a trusted third party.

QuickTroll: SHUT UP! Thank you. That's not your decision to make, dick.

It's simply a suggestion.  If the OP tries to hold collateral, there is a good chance he'll run off with it (collateral scam).  QS is just trying to warn the OP he will get negative trust if he tries this.

It's my suggestion too.   Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 331
Merit: 250
All collateral should be held by a trusted third party.

QuickTroll: SHUT UP! Thank you. That's not your decision to make, dick.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
I don't really think someone modified the post, most probably I copy pasted some text from this thread to create my loan thread and forgot to change the address. Which is awkward.

It's still better than the OP being a scammer.   Wink

Yep, sorry for the confusion. I guess being too paranoid is not good as well.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I don't really think someone modified the post, most probably I copy pasted some text from this thread to create my loan thread and forgot to change the address. Which is awkward.

It's still better than the OP being a scammer.   Wink
copper member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 2348
If the hacker was able to figure out what the OP's password is then he could have logged into his account and changed the repayment address.

IMO this is a good reason why you should not use a single repayment address as many lenders in the lending section like to do.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
Hey OP, are you sure 15V9ZNTezDkQabQYbAeqDVsz3Ke6dPq2zb is your address? Someone replaced the repayment address in my loan thread with 15V9ZNTezDkQabQYbAeqDVsz3Ke6dPq2zb during the hack.

Was your account hacked?

No, i changed the password and the security question right after the site went online.

Then how did someone replace the payment address in your loan thread?  I'm confused!

Nothing was taken from the compromised server except the database. Backups were used for the code and configuration. Some moderators and I checked (partly manually and partly automatically) the differences between the backed up database and the live database and found no backdoors or anything obvious wrong. It is possible that the content of some posts and things were modified, though I don't think so.

I don't really think someone modified the post, most probably I copy pasted some text from this thread to create my loan thread and forgot to change the address. Which is awkward.
Pages:
Jump to: