no matter what you or the lawyers say HF will remain in history as a scamming, lying and lousy company instead of a high-tech start-up that simply failed. Period.
Of course Mistakes Were Made
® at HF. That's normal and does not imply lack of best efforts (much less "scamming") no matter how ugly your fervent desire to defame those who (as confirmed by the bankruptcy court) tried their hardest to make it work.
If the price of BTC had stayed at $1k (or mooned to $10k), we HF customers would be sending them thank-you notes for the magical money-printing machines they made for us.
How is it HF's fault the price and difficulty diverged in a perfect storm that also took out Cointerra and AM (among others)? Is Cointerra a scam also? Isn't AM a confirmed scam?
Why don't you pester former Cointerra or Asicminer proponents like you do to me? Is it because I had the temerity to push back against the popular lynch mob mentality/agenda, and you find that unforgivable? How flattering!
HF didn't make us place our bets on the big/fast/hot/immersion strategy. We freely chose to do that. Some of us hedged with small/slow/cool ASICs.
Anyway, it's not what the lawyers or I say that matters. It's the facts, as established by the judicial record, that matter.
There is only one remaining case with the potential to find the CEO/CTO committed fraud, and its scope has already been narrowed.
If you aren't going to listen to what the judges/courts say, just because they disagree with your prejudgements, what does that say about you? What makes you think your biased, under-informed opinion is more valid than the professional judges who are in possession of all the relevant facts, especially when you can't even be bothered to read the primary sources?
It sounds like you are saying nothing, not even facts, can convince you HF failed due to unfavorable business conditions.
Is that actually your position, that your mind is made up regardless of the truth?
Are you really telling us the courts are lying, unless they reach the same conclusions you have?