OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 154.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: dant on December 22, 2013, 05:24:22 PM

Using cgminer to connect to bitminter.

Code:

[root cgminer-2.5.0]# ./cgminer -o http://mint.bitminter.com:80 -u doesnt -p matter
 [2013-12-22 21:17:21] Started cgminer 2.5.0                    
 [2013-12-22 21:17:21] Probing for an alive pool                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Pool 0 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Unable to get work from pool 0 http://mint.bitminter.com:80                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] No servers were found that could be used to get work from.                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Please check the details from the list below of the servers you have input                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Most likely you have input the wrong URL, forgotten to add a port, or have not set up workers                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Pool: 0  URL: http://mint.bitminter.com:80

Any ideas? I've tried the other ports listed for bitminter too, nothing.

Mate, 2.5.0 is ANCIENT. It won't connect to shit worth shit.

dant

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Using cgminer to connect to bitminter.

Code:

[root cgminer-2.5.0]# ./cgminer -o http://mint.bitminter.com:80 -u doesnt -p matter
 [2013-12-22 21:17:21] Started cgminer 2.5.0                    
 [2013-12-22 21:17:21] Probing for an alive pool                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Pool 0 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Unable to get work from pool 0 http://mint.bitminter.com:80                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] No servers were found that could be used to get work from.                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Please check the details from the list below of the servers you have input                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Most likely you have input the wrong URL, forgotten to add a port, or have not set up workers                    
 [2013-12-22 21:18:21] Pool: 0  URL: http://mint.bitminter.com:80

Any ideas? I've tried the other ports listed for bitminter too, nothing.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: x0rcist on December 21, 2013, 07:24:19 PM

Quote from: nwoolls on December 15, 2013, 12:37:12 AM

Hi there. I am here to report what looks to be a bug in cgminer. This bug manifests itself if you run cgminer pointed at the stratum port of the bfgminer proxy. This has been reported by numerous users, usually trying to point their KnC miner at the bfgminer proxy:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3970326

I'm having to exact same issue wich makes it unable to properly manage my asics in a fast way. Would be nice if this bug gets priority because after searching it looks like i'm not the only one Sad

Thanks!

Should be fixed in git now.

x0rcist

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: nwoolls on December 15, 2013, 12:37:12 AM

Hi there. I am here to report what looks to be a bug in cgminer. This bug manifests itself if you run cgminer pointed at the stratum port of the bfgminer proxy. This has been reported by numerous users, usually trying to point their KnC miner at the bfgminer proxy:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3970326

To reproduce:

Code:

bfgminer --stratum-port 4444 -o some.miningpool.com -u worker -p password
cgminer --o 127.0.0.1:4444 -u doesnt -p matter

The output will repeatedly read:

Code:

Rejected a18df423 Diff 2/1 GPU 1  (H-not-zero)

I worked with Luke to debug both bfgminer and cgminer and he was able to make a few changes in the cgminer source to get accepted shares. Here is a summary of what he had to say:

Quote

cgminer is broken if nonce2_size is anything other than 4 (32-bit)
A proxy must always reduce the nonce2_size from the upstream server
BFGMiner always uses 2 (16-bit)
cgminer is memcpy-ing nonce2 with a fixed 32-bit size, even if nonce2_size is smaller
If you were to just memcpy the nonce2 with an adjusted size, it will fix little endian but break on big endian (to confirm the bug)

I'd really like to keep this civil and hopefully get a legitimate look at this bug as I am getting numerous users reporting it as I mentioned before. Thanks Con!

I'm having to exact same issue wich makes it unable to properly manage my asics in a fast way. Would be nice if this bug gets priority because after searching it looks like i'm not the only one Sad

Thanks!

momchilandonov

jr. member

Activity: 121

Merit: 1

Quote from: chadtn on December 20, 2013, 12:54:04 AM

Quote from: momchilandonov on December 19, 2013, 06:16:54 PM

Here is what I see with -n command. Problem is my R9 290 isn't monitored no matter what --gpu-platform or --gpu-map commands I make. I have the same issue if there is a HD5870 but even worse because it doesn't start if a monitor isn't plugged in. R9 290's fan is working on low rpm so I am sure the card can be damaged very easily that way in like 5-10 minutes maybe( I wonder if there is some throttling solution to this integrated in the GPU?)? I want it to be monitored by cgminer. Please tell me the right command in this scenario. Also will there be a difference if I don't attach a monitor on my integrated Intel HD Graphics GPU too? Only ethernet and power cables and autorun file Tongue

.
It works on --gpu-platform 1 but it doesn't show temperatures. If I change 1 to 0 cgminer shuts down or if I choose -d 1 or more... maybe I need to use a combination of gpu-map and --gpu-platform?

My Radeon 290's have to have at least one monitor plugged in or ADL monitoring will not work. Using the onboard video doesn't count. I have to have at least one monitor on one of the 290 cards. If the monitor turns off for any reason while it is hashing the system will eventually lock up. Works the same way in Linux and Windows. AMD/ATI needs to fix that ASAP. I just downloaded the latest WHQL drivers for Windows that were released today, but haven't tested them yet to see if it was fixed. Nothing is mentioned about it in the tiny little change log they included. What's strange is something like 40MB's has been removed from the driver package.

Chad

My machine is working like a charm without a monitor! Latest drivers from AMD. I didn't installed SDK additionally (comes with the driver). I don't plug in monitor! Just used my TV to install Windows 7 Cheesy

but I think the VGA starts without an attached monitor. Could be a motherboard issue. I am using FM2A88X Extreme 6+ which supports 3 PCI-E!!! Also a friend is using two r9 290 without a monitor attached and they both work again on Windows 7 latest drivers (could be using the beta 13.11 or something like that). Mine aren't beta!
My R9 290 wasn't starting up even with monitor the first couple of days because I was trying it with a weak Fortron 350 watts but I think it has to do with the 6-8 pins VGA power cables.

chadtn

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 250

Quote from: momchilandonov on December 19, 2013, 06:16:54 PM

Here is what I see with -n command. Problem is my R9 290 isn't monitored no matter what --gpu-platform or --gpu-map commands I make. I have the same issue if there is a HD5870 but even worse because it doesn't start if a monitor isn't plugged in. R9 290's fan is working on low rpm so I am sure the card can be damaged very easily that way in like 5-10 minutes maybe( I wonder if there is some throttling solution to this integrated in the GPU?)? I want it to be monitored by cgminer. Please tell me the right command in this scenario. Also will there be a difference if I don't attach a monitor on my integrated Intel HD Graphics GPU too? Only ethernet and power cables and autorun file Tongue

.
It works on --gpu-platform 1 but it doesn't show temperatures. If I change 1 to 0 cgminer shuts down or if I choose -d 1 or more... maybe I need to use a combination of gpu-map and --gpu-platform?

My Radeon 290's have to have at least one monitor plugged in or ADL monitoring will not work. Using the onboard video doesn't count. I have to have at least one monitor on one of the 290 cards. If the monitor turns off for any reason while it is hashing the system will eventually lock up. Works the same way in Linux and Windows. AMD/ATI needs to fix that ASAP. I just downloaded the latest WHQL drivers for Windows that were released today, but haven't tested them yet to see if it was fixed. Nothing is mentioned about it in the tiny little change log they included. What's strange is something like 40MB's has been removed from the driver package.

Chad

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: TurdHurdur on December 19, 2013, 08:59:04 PM

Quote from: -ck on December 19, 2013, 08:54:14 PM

Quote from: -ck on November 10, 2013, 06:25:34 AM

I've finally bitten the bullet and killed off GPU mining from the code and it will not be in the release [..] I am making a conscious decision and taking a stance to only support bitcoin by doing this and will consider all discussions regarding alternative cryptocurrencies [and GPU mining] as offtopic from here on.

Alright, can someone else provide some insight, a time machine, or a free ASIC rig for me?

Try litecoin forums.

TurdHurdur

full member

Activity: 216

Merit: 100

Quote from: -ck on December 19, 2013, 08:54:14 PM

Quote from: -ck on November 10, 2013, 06:25:34 AM

I've finally bitten the bullet and killed off GPU mining from the code and it will not be in the release [..] I am making a conscious decision and taking a stance to only support bitcoin by doing this and will consider all discussions regarding alternative cryptocurrencies [and GPU mining] as offtopic from here on.

Alright, can someone else provide some insight, a time machine, or a free ASIC rig for me?

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: -ck on November 10, 2013, 06:25:34 AM

I've finally bitten the bullet and killed off GPU mining from the code and it will not be in the release [..] I am making a conscious decision and taking a stance to only support bitcoin by doing this and will consider all discussions regarding alternative cryptocurrencies [and GPU mining] as offtopic from here on.

TurdHurdur

full member

Activity: 216

Merit: 100

When specifying a worksize of 512 on 3.7.2, the .bin file created in the program directory has w256 in the filename. Does that mean there's a hardlimit of 256 worksize? Is there a way to go beyond that?

momchilandonov

jr. member

Activity: 121

Merit: 1

http://i40.tinypic.com/2ql8jgx.png

Here is what I see with -n command. Problem is my R9 290 isn't monitored no matter what --gpu-platform or --gpu-map commands I make. I have the same issue if there is a HD5870 but even worse because it doesn't start if a monitor isn't plugged in. R9 290's fan is working on low rpm so I am sure the card can be damaged very easily that way in like 5-10 minutes maybe( I wonder if there is some throttling solution to this integrated in the GPU?)? I want it to be monitored by cgminer. Please tell me the right command in this scenario. Also will there be a difference if I don't attach a monitor on my integrated Intel HD Graphics GPU too? Only ethernet and power cables and autorun file Tongue

.
It works on --gpu-platform 1 but it doesn't show temperatures. If I change 1 to 0 cgminer shuts down or if I choose -d 1 or more... maybe I need to use a combination of gpu-map and --gpu-platform?

Krak

hero member

Activity: 591

Merit: 500

Quote from: Fletch on December 19, 2013, 06:57:24 AM

Quote from: kano on December 18, 2013, 10:48:34 PM

P2Pool has it's own share chain - on p2pool you solve high difficulty shares, not blocks.
Thus a share can be stale due to another share being accepted ... even if the network BTC block hasn't changed.

What this means is that any block found when mining on P2Pool will actually still be a valid BTC block until the next BTC block is found on the network - even if it is a stale share.
P2Pool will send the stale block to the bitcoind in the hope it is actually a valid network block - which it will be ~95% of the time.

This change to p2pool (quite a while ago) meant that you were no longer earning less mining on p2pool - however it does require EVERYONE mining on p2pool to submit stale blocks - which is done by submitting stale shares in cgminer.

Thanks again. I think I got it now. Based on your description, I will continue to submit stales when I'm mining on p2pool, but enable the --no-submit-stale option for other pools.

There's really no harm in letting it submit stales regardless of the pool you're on. Either you'll get paid for the share or it'll be rejected.

dE_logics

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: mdude77 on December 19, 2013, 06:47:06 AM

Quote from: dE_logics on December 19, 2013, 05:01:57 AM

@ckolivas

Hi!

Great job with CGminer and BFS!

I was wondering if you're still giving support for cgminer 3.7 which supports GPU and scrypt mining.

My miner is running and showing the speed in kh/s (scrypt) but till date it has not been able to solve any block. Running CPU miner (which runs at a fraction of the pace) has solved many blocks in the mean time with the same coin.

I'm solo mining many alts.

I'm getting a lot of hardware errors also --
Thanks!!

Check your intensity. It's probably too high. Could be faulty GPU as well.

M

Reducing the intensity will still generate hardware errors . There appears to be some hardware error generated per KH, i.e. halving the KH/s will reduce the no. of errors per second to half.

I still don't get any share with lower intensity.

Fletch

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I'll have a steak sandwich and a... steak sandwich

Quote from: kano on December 18, 2013, 10:48:34 PM

P2Pool has it's own share chain - on p2pool you solve high difficulty shares, not blocks.
Thus a share can be stale due to another share being accepted ... even if the network BTC block hasn't changed.

What this means is that any block found when mining on P2Pool will actually still be a valid BTC block until the next BTC block is found on the network - even if it is a stale share.
P2Pool will send the stale block to the bitcoind in the hope it is actually a valid network block - which it will be ~95% of the time.

This change to p2pool (quite a while ago) meant that you were no longer earning less mining on p2pool - however it does require EVERYONE mining on p2pool to submit stale blocks - which is done by submitting stale shares in cgminer.

Thanks again. I think I got it now. Based on your description, I will continue to submit stales when I'm mining on p2pool, but enable the --no-submit-stale option for other pools.

mdude77

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1001

Quote from: dE_logics on December 19, 2013, 05:01:57 AM

@ckolivas

Hi!

Great job with CGminer and BFS!

I was wondering if you're still giving support for cgminer 3.7 which supports GPU and scrypt mining.

My miner is running and showing the speed in kh/s (scrypt) but till date it has not been able to solve any block. Running CPU miner (which runs at a fraction of the pace) has solved many blocks in the mean time with the same coin.

I'm solo mining many alts.

I'm getting a lot of hardware errors also --
Thanks!!

Check your intensity. It's probably too high. Could be faulty GPU as well.

M

dE_logics

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

@ckolivas

Hi!

Great job with CGminer and BFS!

I was wondering if you're still giving support for cgminer 3.7 which supports GPU and scrypt mining.

My miner is running and showing the speed in kh/s (scrypt) but till date it has not been able to solve any block. Running CPU miner (which runs at a fraction of the pace) has solved many blocks in the mean time with the same coin.

I'm solo mining many alts.

I'm getting a lot of hardware errors also --

Code:

2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU 0 found something?
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 129605 found in slot 0
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] [thread 0: 1048576 hashes, 119.0 khash/sec]
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 183595 found in slot 1
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 205151 found in slot 2
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 348676 found in slot 3
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 361138 found in slot 4
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 455330 found in slot 5
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 516499 found in slot 6
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 526673 found in slot 7
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 557550 found in slot 8
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 600413 found in slot 9
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 610612 found in slot 10
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 656621 found in slot 11
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 783660 found in slot 12
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 939194 found in slot 13
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 993888 found in slot 14
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] Discarded cloned or rolled work
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU 0 found something?                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 129605 found in slot 0                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] [thread 0: 1048576 hashes, 119.0 khash/sec]                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 183595 found in slot 1                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 205151 found in slot 2                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 348676 found in slot 3                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 361138 found in slot 4                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 455330 found in slot 5                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 516499 found in slot 6                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 526673 found in slot 7                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 557550 found in slot 8                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 600413 found in slot 9                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 610612 found in slot 10                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 656621 found in slot 11                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 783660 found in slot 12                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 939194 found in slot 13                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] OCL NONCE 993888 found in slot 14                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:30] Discarded cloned or rolled work                    
(5s):71.89K (avg):87.38Kh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:15  WU:0.0/m          
 [2013-12-17 23:31:39] GPU 0 found something?
 [2013-12-17 23:31:39] [thread 0: 1048576 hashes, 119.1 khash/sec]
 [2013-12-17 23:31:39] GPU 0 found something?                    
 [2013-12-17 23:31:39] [thread 0: 1048576 hashes, 119.1 khash/sec]                    
(5s):118.3K (avg):119.1Kh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:15  WU:0.0/m          
 [2013-12-17 23:31:39] OCL NONCE 1055154 found in slot 0
 [2013-12-17 23:31:39] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error

Thanks!!

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Fletch on December 18, 2013, 05:26:38 PM

Quote from: twmz on December 18, 2013, 04:24:09 PM

It depends on the pool. On some pools, for example p2pool, a stale share may still be a valid block and so if you don't submit stales, you risk missing out on BTC. Historically, there have also been pools that paid for stale shares and so you always wanted to submit them. I don't know that any current pools still do that though.

Ok, thanks. That clears it up a bit. I'm not sure how a stale share can be a valid block though. If I'm not mistaken, a stale share is the result of an "old job" from the pool. In other word, a job that was submitted after someone else had already solved the block.

P2Pool has it's own share chain - on p2pool you solve high difficulty shares, not blocks.
Thus a share can be stale due to another share being accepted ... even if the network BTC block hasn't changed.

What this means is that any block found when mining on P2Pool will actually still be a valid BTC block until the next BTC block is found on the network - even if it is a stale share.
P2Pool will send the stale block to the bitcoind in the hope it is actually a valid network block - which it will be ~95% of the time.

This change to p2pool (quite a while ago) meant that you were no longer earning less mining on p2pool - however it does require EVERYONE mining on p2pool to submit stale blocks - which is done by submitting stale shares in cgminer.

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Quote from: Aurum on December 17, 2013, 12:46:57 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on December 17, 2013, 12:18:41 PM

Quote from: Aurum on December 17, 2013, 12:14:34 PM

Quote from: HellDiverUK on December 16, 2013, 10:27:17 AM

Quote from: Aurum on December 15, 2013, 11:46:54 AM

1. I'm trying to get an MSI Z87-G45 mb running Win8.1 to mine with 7 cards but it only mines with 5. Windows Device Manager recognizes all 7 cards. Any ideas on how I can get cards 6 and 7 to mine Huh

Use Linux, Windows doesn't support 7 GPUs.

Funny then, why are there several motherboards made expressly to run 7 graphics cards???

Maybe because not everyone uses Windows? Huh

Except the vast majority of the world.

Whatever you want - chase your tail. Windows doesn't support 7 GPUs, period. Whatever you think doesn't change that fact.

Motherboards may have 7 PCI-E slots, doesn't mean they're made to run 7 GPUs. Other things use PCI-E - RAID cards, sound cards, NICs...

So, yeah, use Linux.

Fletch

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I'll have a steak sandwich and a... steak sandwich

Quote from: twmz on December 18, 2013, 04:24:09 PM

It depends on the pool. On some pools, for example p2pool, a stale share may still be a valid block and so if you don't submit stales, you risk missing out on BTC. Historically, there have also been pools that paid for stale shares and so you always wanted to submit them. I don't know that any current pools still do that though.

Ok, thanks. That clears it up a bit. I'm not sure how a stale share can be a valid block though. If I'm not mistaken, a stale share is the result of an "old job" from the pool. In other word, a job that was submitted after someone else had already solved the block.

twmz

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 500

Quote from: Fletch on December 18, 2013, 04:13:15 PM

Sorry if this has been discussed earlier in this topic, but it's almost 700 pages long and I couldn't find anything while searching.

My question is regarding the --no-submit-stale option. Forgive my ignorance, but why would you ever want to submit a stale?

It depends on the pool. On some pools, for example p2pool, a stale share may still be a valid block and so if you don't submit stales, you risk missing out on BTC. Historically, there have also been pools that paid for stale shares and so you always wanted to submit them. I don't know that any current pools still do that though.

Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 154. (Read 5805527 times)