Author

Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 757. (Read 5805728 times)

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
If you don't see anything in netstat other than the TCP Wait, I would guess there is only communication to check for new blocks and to submit a found block.  In that case, presumably a found block would be cached if communication was interrupted, but I don't know if it would be quickly discarded the way a share is.  Also, while I don't know, I would guess that something would indicate the communication problem when it became apparent to the miner (puddinpop's cuda miner will tell you communication is interrupted and continue mining and telling you it doesn't have communication).  If it does, watching for that would make more sense than keeping track of rejected shares that don't benefit the server anyway.  However, since communication isn't likely to be a miner problem, anything that might cuase a communication problem could probably be monitored elsewhere (monitor bitcoind or Internet connectivity or whatever you need for what you're doing).


who wants to go thru all that...  a quick glance at cgminer humming allong showing rejected shares is alot easier......  How about a menu option for it?
hero member
Activity: 807
Merit: 500
If you don't see anything in netstat other than the TCP Wait, I would guess there is only communication to check for new blocks and to submit a found block.  In that case, presumably a found block would be cached if communication was interrupted, but I don't know if it would be quickly discarded the way a share is.  Also, while I don't know, I would guess that something would indicate the communication problem when it became apparent to the miner (puddinpop's cuda miner will tell you communication is interrupted and continue mining and telling you it doesn't have communication).  If it does, watching for that would make more sense than keeping track of rejected shares that don't benefit the server anyway.  However, since communication isn't likely to be a miner problem, anything that might cuase a communication problem could probably be monitored elsewhere (monitor bitcoind or Internet connectivity or whatever you need for what you're doing).
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
So, is there any way to verify that solo mining is actually working now?
There is an MHash/sec indicator that implies hashes are being calculated at that rate.  If something goes wrong with your mining equipment, that number wil drop.  If you Are concerned about connectivity, I would think you could simply use netstat to verify a local connection or wireshark to verify a remote one.

That's what I would have thought too.

I shut down my bitcoin client, running in server mode, and CGMiner will continue to chug along as if it were still working fine.  But, at least, with 2.0.5 the rejected share notification stops.

If you run netstat while solo mining you will see a time wait for for the process's but no connection established.  So my theory is that there is an initial connection using the TCP stack but then it reverts to some other type of communication between the two programs since they are on the same machine.

Also now it looks like the donation isn't working in 2.0.5 now.  Is conman still an active account on Ozco?
Sam
hero member
Activity: 807
Merit: 500
So, is there any way to verify that solo mining is actually working now?
There is an MHash/sec indicator that implies hashes are being calculated at that rate.  If something goes wrong with your mining equipment, that number wil drop.  If you Are concerned about connectivity, I would think you could simply use netstat to verify a local connection or wireshark to verify a remote one.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
In 2.0.7 I don't get any feedback as to if solo mining is working or not.  In version 2.0.5 I would get rejected for a status on the solo pool so I knew it was working.  Is there any way of verifying that it is actually working in the later versions?

Also it doesn't seem like the donation is working either in 2.0.7.  I haven't wiresharked it yet to see if it is actually sending to Ozco, but that would be my next step.

Thanks,
Sam
2.0.7 only shows messages at the level the source of the getwork requires.

Solo to bitcoind means you are trying to get blocks, so you get a message whenever you get a block.
(shares are not related to solo but: it used to show messages at share level, not block level, bit that has been 'fixed')

Pool means you are trying to get shares, so you get a message whenever you get a share.

I believe the donation is pointing somewhere else now.

I am glad I did not upgrade then.  I want to see the rejected shares when mining solo.  it verifies that your connected properly.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
In 2.0.7 I don't get any feedback as to if solo mining is working or not.  In version 2.0.5 I would get rejected for a status on the solo pool so I knew it was working.  Is there any way of verifying that it is actually working in the later versions?

Also it doesn't seem like the donation is working either in 2.0.7.  I haven't wiresharked it yet to see if it is actually sending to Ozco, but that would be my next step.

Thanks,
Sam
2.0.7 only shows messages at the level the source of the getwork requires.

Solo to bitcoind means you are trying to get blocks, so you get a message whenever you get a block.
(shares are not related to solo but: it used to show messages at share level, not block level, bit that has been 'fixed')

Pool means you are trying to get shares, so you get a message whenever you get a share.

I believe the donation is pointing somewhere else now.

So, is there any way to verify that solo mining is actually working now?

Is the donation not using port 8332 now?  I guess I can check that myself, but if not I'll need to set a new firewall rule.
Sam
http://arsbitcoin.com:8344

But that can change of course (as it has recently) it's not hard coded.
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
In 2.0.7 I don't get any feedback as to if solo mining is working or not.  In version 2.0.5 I would get rejected for a status on the solo pool so I knew it was working.  Is there any way of verifying that it is actually working in the later versions?

Also it doesn't seem like the donation is working either in 2.0.7.  I haven't wiresharked it yet to see if it is actually sending to Ozco, but that would be my next step.

Thanks,
Sam
2.0.7 only shows messages at the level the source of the getwork requires.

Solo to bitcoind means you are trying to get blocks, so you get a message whenever you get a block.
(shares are not related to solo but: it used to show messages at share level, not block level, bit that has been 'fixed')

Pool means you are trying to get shares, so you get a message whenever you get a share.

I believe the donation is pointing somewhere else now.

So, is there any way to verify that solo mining is actually working now?

Is the donation not using port 8332 now?  I guess I can check that myself, but if not I'll need to set a new firewall rule.
Sam
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
In 2.0.7 I don't get any feedback as to if solo mining is working or not.  In version 2.0.5 I would get rejected for a status on the solo pool so I knew it was working.  Is there any way of verifying that it is actually working in the later versions?

Also it doesn't seem like the donation is working either in 2.0.7.  I haven't wiresharked it yet to see if it is actually sending to Ozco, but that would be my next step.

Thanks,
Sam
2.0.7 only shows messages at the level the source of the getwork requires.

Solo to bitcoind means you are trying to get blocks, so you get a message whenever you get a block.
(shares are not related to solo but: it used to show messages at share level, not block level, bit that has been 'fixed')

Pool means you are trying to get shares, so you get a message whenever you get a share.

I believe the donation is pointing somewhere else now.
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
In 2.0.7 I don't get any feedback as to if solo mining is working or not.  In version 2.0.5 I would get rejected for a status on the solo pool so I knew it was working.  Is there any way of verifying that it is actually working in the later versions?

Also it doesn't seem like the donation is working either in 2.0.7.  I haven't wiresharked it yet to see if it is actually sending to Ozco, but that would be my next step.

Thanks,
Sam
legendary
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
In README.TXT inside archive of windows binary , it says as below.

Code:

WHILE RUNNING:

The following options are available while running with a single keypress:

[P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit

P gives you:

Current pool management strategy: Failover
[A]dd pool [R]emove pool [D]isable pool [E]nable pool
[C]hange management strategy [S]witch pool [I]nformation


S gives you:

[L]ongpoll: On
[Q]ueue: 1
[S]cantime: 60
[E]xpiry: 120
[R]etries: -1
[P]ause: 5
[W]rite config file


D gives you:

Toggle: [D]ebug [N]ormal [S]ilent [V]erbose [R]PC debug
[L]og interval [C]lear


Q quits the application.


G gives you something like:

GPU 0: [124.2 / 191.3 Mh/s] [Q:212  A:77  R:33  HW:0  E:36%  U:1.73/m]
Temp: 67.0 C
Fan Speed: 35% (2500 RPM)
Engine Clock: 960 MHz
Memory Clock: 480 Mhz
Vddc: 1.200 V
Activity: 93%
Powertune: 0%
Last initialised: [2011-09-06 12:03:56]
Thread 0: 62.4 Mh/s Enabled ALIVE
Thread 1: 60.2 Mh/s Enabled ALIVE

[E]nable [D]isable [R]estart GPU [C]hange settings
Or press any other key to continue


---
Also many issues and FAQs are covered in the forum thread
dedicated to this program,
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=28402.0

The output line shows the following:
 GPU 1: 73.5C 2551RPM | 427.3/443.0Mh/s | A:8 R:0 HW:0 U:4.39/m

Each column is as follows:
Temperature (if supported)
Fanspeed (if supported)
A 5 second exponentially decaying average hash rate
An all time average hash rate
The number of accepted shares
The number of rejected shares
The number of hardware erorrs
The utility defines as the number of shares / minute

The cgminer status line shows:
 TQ: 1  ST: 1  SS: 0  DW: 0  NB: 1  LW: 8  GF: 1  RF: 1

TQ is Total Queued work items.
ST is STaged work items (ready to use).
SS is Stale Shares discarded (detected and not submitted so don't count as rejects)
DW is Discarded Work items (work from block no longer valid to work on)
NB is New Blocks detected on the network
LW is Locally generated Work items
GF is Getwork Fail Occasions (server slow to provide work)
RF is Remote Fail occasions (server slow to accept work)

NOTE: Running intensities above 9 with current hardware is likely to only
diminish return performance even if the hash rate might appear better. A good
starting baseline intensity to try on dedicated miners is 9. Higher values are
there to cope with future improvements in hardware.

---

full member
Activity: 373
Merit: 100
First post doesnt mention it AFAICT, but indeed, I missed it in the readme. For those as blind as me:

It does, however, mention this:
READ THE README INCLUDED IN THE ARCHIVE BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS .

which is why I assumed you hadn't read that properly, either... Wink
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
First post doesnt mention it AFAICT, but indeed, I missed it in the readme. For those as blind as me:

TQ is Total Queued work items.
ST is STaged work items (ready to use).
SS is Stale Shares discarded (detected and not submitted so don't count as rejects)
DW is Discarded Work items (work from block no longer valid to work on)
NB is New Blocks detected on the network
LW is Locally generated Work items
GF is Getwork Fail Occasions (server slow to provide work)
RF is Remote Fail occasions (server slow to accept work)

Thats most of them at least.
full member
Activity: 373
Merit: 100
Apologies, as Im sure this has been asked before, but I couldnt find it and I dont really feel like wading through 90+ pages..
so could someone kindly explain all the numbers shown in cgminer or point me to a post where I could find it?
See the first post and the README file.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Apologies, as Im sure this has been asked before, but I couldnt find it and I dont really feel like wading through 90+ pages..
so could someone kindly explain all the numbers shown in cgminer or point me to a post where I could find it?



From the top, the 5s and average, that I understand Smiley. but what is
Q?
A(ccepted?)
R(rejected?)
HW (HW error?)
E(fficiency, but what does that mean?),
U?
TQ?
ST?
SS?
DW?
NB?
LW?
GF?
RF?
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
Hi? I`m Win7 x64-user, where can I get all files to install this software...I can find out only GPU miner binary on github, but also I need to download
Quote
Install mingw32 /// Install libcurl, copy libcurl.m4 into /mingw/share/aclocal   /// Install pkg-config, copy pkg.m4 into /mingw/share/aclocal
from where can I get this?

Ever tried reading the first post? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
Hi? I`m Win7 x64-user, where can I get all files to install this software...I can find out only GPU miner binary on github, but also I need to download
Quote
Install mingw32 /// Install libcurl, copy libcurl.m4 into /mingw/share/aclocal   /// Install pkg-config, copy pkg.m4 into /mingw/share/aclocal
from where can I get this?
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Conman, i just want to ask, if pdcurses did not exist for mingw, what route would you have taken in regards to the UI?
I never really cared about the windows version. Consider it luck that there was an equivalent that Ycros originally helped greatly with and then I had the painful task of actually keeping the windows version building.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
What needs fixing?

The only possible problem is if the pool passes back LP/block info on 2 different block-chains.

If that is the case, then your so called "fix" is to cripple cgminer - so no I can't see that happening.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Soooo, now that more pools are offering merged mining, are there any plans to incorporate a fix for this in future cgminer versions?
full member
Activity: 225
Merit: 100
@ckolivas: When you have a spare minute could you please adjust the display layout?

Right now the "panel" which displays the CPU stats is sized too big when you start "cgimer" with less threads then you could ( cpu-threads (arg) < cpu-threads (default)). With just a few devices, it doesn't realy matter but on a 48 core box this is quite ugly:



Jump to: