[Official] So what happened to Elacoin? - page 2.

arjay45

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:36:47 AM

Quote from: arjay45 on May 14, 2013, 02:34:37 AM

Quote from: arjay45 on May 14, 2013, 02:29:15 AM

Quote

static CBigNum bnProofOfWorkLimit(~uint256(0) >> 10000000); // Elacoin: starting difficulty

Wait... this doesn't make sense. There's only 256 bits. Shifting right by ten million bits would result in zero. So the value of the above is zero.

On the other hand I have no idea what that variable means so feel free to ignore me if I'm talking out of my ass.

Just doubling my chances of the OP seeing this in case it's a bug... sorry to repeat myself.

Well, the value of it is not zero as you can see by debug.log

Well I guess in C++ you can override the >> operator so it doesn't mean "shift right N bits" any more. But if that is still what it means then I would think there's a bug. But I don't know the source code very well. I am way too sleepy to go source diving at this hour. I'm helping with the mining of the genesis block though just in case it will speed this process up.

r3animation

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: dentldir on May 14, 2013, 02:39:15 AM

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:17:32 AM

If it was not Hazard, then it was dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope. Wasn't me. I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch. I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source. However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes. Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.

So you're releasing the windows binaries?

coinerd

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: dentldir on May 14, 2013, 02:39:15 AM

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:17:32 AM

If it was not Hazard, then it was dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope. Wasn't me. I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch. I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source. However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes. Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.

how many coinds has it generated in 5k blocks of 2 Mh?

nerdcustoms

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

well 3:40 AM here now.... should I sleep, take a dump, or get coffee? or all of the above?

JohnDorien

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: dentldir on May 14, 2013, 02:39:15 AM

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:17:32 AM

If it was not Hazard, then it was dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope. Wasn't me. I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch. I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source. However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes. Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.

well let's hope milkshake changed the sentence for genesis hash after the first source distibution

com911

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Such an alt-drama here.

dentldir

sr. member

Activity: 333

Merit: 250

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:17:32 AM

If it was not Hazard, then it was dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope. Wasn't me. I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch. I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source. However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes. Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.

Milkshake

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Milkshake

Quote from: arjay45 on May 14, 2013, 02:34:37 AM

Quote from: arjay45 on May 14, 2013, 02:29:15 AM

Quote

static CBigNum bnProofOfWorkLimit(~uint256(0) >> 10000000); // Elacoin: starting difficulty

Wait... this doesn't make sense. There's only 256 bits. Shifting right by ten million bits would result in zero. So the value of the above is zero.

On the other hand I have no idea what that variable means so feel free to ignore me if I'm talking out of my ass.

Just doubling my chances of the OP seeing this in case it's a bug... sorry to repeat myself.

Well, the value of it is not zero as you can see by debug.log

wesjuhnl

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: torbank on May 14, 2013, 02:35:40 AM

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:29:54 AM

Quote from: gpudude on May 14, 2013, 02:28:26 AM

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:27:43 AM

You can see the target in debug log.

The topic will be reopened once we have a genesis block.

POST AN ETA rather than random release!

Do you understand it is impossible for me to give an ETA? It's like mining, I don't know when we'll hit the genesis block.

Can you set a time.

Say, Noon GMT?

Soon....

torbank

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:29:54 AM

Quote from: gpudude on May 14, 2013, 02:28:26 AM

Quote from: Milkshake on May 14, 2013, 02:27:43 AM

You can see the target in debug log.

The topic will be reopened once we have a genesis block.

POST AN ETA rather than random release!

Do you understand it is impossible for me to give an ETA? It's like mining, I don't know when we'll hit the genesis block.

Can you set a time.

Say, Noon GMT?

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: wesjuhnl on May 14, 2013, 02:33:28 AM

Quote from: iGotSpots on May 14, 2013, 02:32:59 AM

I wonder where that pool dude went

Deviant ?

Yea, I see he updated his site like 20 mins ago since I posted that

Hazard

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

Quote from: arjay45 on May 14, 2013, 02:34:37 AM

Quote from: arjay45 on May 14, 2013, 02:29:15 AM

Quote

static CBigNum bnProofOfWorkLimit(~uint256(0) >> 10000000); // Elacoin: starting difficulty

Wait... this doesn't make sense. There's only 256 bits. Shifting right by ten million bits would result in zero. So the value of the above is zero.

On the other hand I have no idea what that variable means so feel free to ignore me if I'm talking out of my ass.

Just doubling my chances of the OP seeing this in case it's a bug... sorry to repeat myself.

Shhhhhhh

arjay45

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: arjay45 on May 14, 2013, 02:29:15 AM

Quote

static CBigNum bnProofOfWorkLimit(~uint256(0) >> 10000000); // Elacoin: starting difficulty

Wait... this doesn't make sense. There's only 256 bits. Shifting right by ten million bits would result in zero. So the value of the above is zero.

On the other hand I have no idea what that variable means so feel free to ignore me if I'm talking out of my ass.

Just doubling my chances of the OP seeing this in case it's a bug... sorry to repeat myself.

wesjuhnl

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10