Pages:
Author

Topic: OLD: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB - page 101. (Read 1193368 times)

hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Hey, sorry if this has already been covered but I just got a jalapeno and I'm running it under BFGMiner 3.3.0 along with 14 BEs.  It's on a MacMini running Ubuntu 12.04 i386.  The setup will run fine for anywhere from 2-3 hours to 20+ hours but then the jalapeno will report as sick.  The jalapeno is plugged directly into the MacMini and the BEs are in 2 Anker hubs that are plugged into another hub and from there into the mini.  Once I shutdown BFGMiner and restart everything works again.  The temps look fine, 38-41, and I'm just wondering if anyone has a suggestion.

move the jalapeno into your master hub.
member
Activity: 262
Merit: 10
Hey, sorry if this has already been covered but I just got a jalapeno and I'm running it under BFGMiner 3.3.0 along with 14 BEs.  It's on a MacMini running Ubuntu 12.04 i386.  The setup will run fine for anywhere from 2-3 hours to 20+ hours but then the jalapeno will report as sick.  The jalapeno is plugged directly into the MacMini and the BEs are in 2 Anker hubs that are plugged into another hub and from there into the mini.  Once I shutdown BFGMiner and restart everything works again.  The temps look fine, 38-41, and I'm just wondering if anyone has a suggestion.
hero member
Activity: 626
Merit: 500
Mining since May 2011.
How hard is it to use bfg in unbunto. Im a windows guy ready for a change.
If you are looking into reducing your overhead even more, you might want to checkout http://minepeon.com
It's a mining distro that runs off a Raspberry Pi.
full member
Activity: 158
Merit: 100
How hard is it to use bfg in unbunto. Im a windows guy ready for a change.

Hi my setup doc for xubuntu should help you http://tinyurl.com/cboxzdy
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
How hard is it to use bfg in unbunto. Im a windows guy ready for a change.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
Why is not possible to Install it on CENTOS and REDHAT HuhHuh
Pretty sure a number of people use it on RedHat/CentOS.
It's my understanding they'll soon have a package in the official repositories.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Why is not possible to Install it on CENTOS and REDHAT HuhHuh
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
I`ve tried switching from .3 to .4, carried over the bat file, and started 3.4, added a pool pressed enter and...it froze. did nothing for 10 mins.

Any ideas?

My bat file works perfectly on 3.3, and thats the only thing i`ve added.

Does the old 3.3.0 bat file still work on version 3.3.0?

If so start version 3.4.0 with the old bat file.

Then if you want to change or add another pool, just work on a spare copy of the file.

it does work indeed. i`ve swtched back to .3 for the moment.  I also get a Error failed to wake notifier spam the window.  Like i said 3.3 works like a dream
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Watch the miner logs - bfgminer display up to ica14 by default - not sure how to reset it.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Quote
I recently began building up my mini-wannabe army of Erupters: only 18 so far. All into USB 3.0 ports.

9 Erupters per 10 port, powered, USB3.0 Dyconn hub[10th is fan]. The specs i read say this hub can power whats in it.

However, BFGminer wont run more than 15 of these ASIC Erupters. At least, it only shows 0-14 and associated info(hasrates etc)

Sometimes it will only run half my Erupters, 9, but random ones from each hub, not just 9 from one and none from the other.

This acts like you do not have a full 0.5 amps to each usb port.  I know Dyconn claims .900mA per port, that means it must have a 9 amp power supply.  I bet if you measured the amp out put it well be less than 9 amps.  A good Fluke meter can measure up to 10 amps dc with out a external shunt.

Doesn't need to be 9A if the PSU is outputting 12v.  Only needs to be a 4-5A 12v to provide 9A of 5v.

It does sound like a power problem.
Take a read through this thread:-   https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2700634
Lots of hub information.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 501
Quote
I recently began building up my mini-wannabe army of Erupters: only 18 so far. All into USB 3.0 ports.

9 Erupters per 10 port, powered, USB3.0 Dyconn hub[10th is fan]. The specs i read say this hub can power whats in it.

However, BFGminer wont run more than 15 of these ASIC Erupters. At least, it only shows 0-14 and associated info(hasrates etc)

Sometimes it will only run half my Erupters, 9, but random ones from each hub, not just 9 from one and none from the other.

This acts like you do not have a full 0.5 amps to each usb port.  I know Dyconn claims .900mA per port, that means it must have a 9 amp power supply.  I bet if you measured the amp out put it well be less than 9 amps.  A good Fluke meter can measure up to 10 amps dc with out a external shunt.

Doesn't need to be 9A if the PSU is outputting 12v.  Only needs to be a 4-5A 12v to provide 9A of 5v.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Luke, can you comment on the following, regarding BlueFuries:

They draw 0.5A from what the EE has told me.
The command would be along the lines of.

Code:
bfgminer -S bigpic:all -o pool -u user -p pass

Also if you are using bfgminer from Luke's build you won't be able to probe for both block eruptor and blue fury as both probes will break each other. If that makes sense?

Hmm. I plan to run two separate instances of bfgminer, where one instance would only control/probe for Erupters (-S erupter:all), and the other - only BFs (-S bigpic:all).  Hope this works. If not, I'd need to plan for all BlueFuries running from a separate machine.  Huh
I don't think cgminer has the same issue. One option would be use a old version of bfgminer sub 3.3.0 so it is only compatiable with the block eruptors and then use our version of bfgminer. Theoretically that should work. Luke might know a better idea or he might have some kind of fix in the works I am not sure.
Just don't use -S :all
This tells BFGMiner to probe every port for the device.
Erupters can't handle BigPic probes, and BigPic can't handle Icarus probes.

Hi Luke-Jr
So does this mean I need to specify all the com ports, if I am mixing Erupters and BlueFurys?

I use -S all for my erupters, when I added a Fury I used the :\\.\COMn. but the Fury was not found.
If I run the Fury on its own then it works ok.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Quote
I recently began building up my mini-wannabe army of Erupters: only 18 so far. All into USB 3.0 ports.

9 Erupters per 10 port, powered, USB3.0 Dyconn hub[10th is fan]. The specs i read say this hub can power whats in it.

However, BFGminer wont run more than 15 of these ASIC Erupters. At least, it only shows 0-14 and associated info(hasrates etc)

Sometimes it will only run half my Erupters, 9, but random ones from each hub, not just 9 from one and none from the other.

This acts like you do not have a full 0.5 amps to each usb port.  I know Dyconn claims .900mA per port, that means it must have a 9 amp power supply.  I bet if you measured the amp out put it well be less than 9 amps.  A good Fluke meter can measure up to 10 amps dc with out a external shunt.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
Luke, can you comment on the following, regarding BlueFuries:

They draw 0.5A from what the EE has told me.
The command would be along the lines of.

Code:
bfgminer -S bigpic:all -o pool -u user -p pass

Also if you are using bfgminer from Luke's build you won't be able to probe for both block eruptor and blue fury as both probes will break each other. If that makes sense?

Hmm. I plan to run two separate instances of bfgminer, where one instance would only control/probe for Erupters (-S erupter:all), and the other - only BFs (-S bigpic:all).  Hope this works. If not, I'd need to plan for all BlueFuries running from a separate machine.  Huh
I don't think cgminer has the same issue. One option would be use a old version of bfgminer sub 3.3.0 so it is only compatiable with the block eruptors and then use our version of bfgminer. Theoretically that should work. Luke might know a better idea or he might have some kind of fix in the works I am not sure.
Just don't use -S :all
This tells BFGMiner to probe every port for the device.
Erupters can't handle BigPic probes, and BigPic can't handle Icarus probes.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014

edit: also, when BFGminer starts, it often says i cannon access certain COM ports. Seems to be different ones each time.

I experienced this problem when UPS controller software would hi-jack random COM ports. I had to uninstall UPS monitor, but I am petitioning for Luke to include a delayed automatic re-scan of COM ports that failed to initialise. Wink
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
Luke, can you comment on the following, regarding BlueFuries:

They draw 0.5A from what the EE has told me.
The command would be along the lines of.

Code:
bfgminer -S bigpic:all -o pool -u user -p pass

Also if you are using bfgminer from Luke's build you won't be able to probe for both block eruptor and blue fury as both probes will break each other. If that makes sense?

Hmm. I plan to run two separate instances of bfgminer, where one instance would only control/probe for Erupters (-S erupter:all), and the other - only BFs (-S bigpic:all).  Hope this works. If not, I'd need to plan for all BlueFuries running from a separate machine.  Huh
I don't think cgminer has the same issue. One option would be use a old version of bfgminer sub 3.3.0 so it is only compatiable with the block eruptors and then use our version of bfgminer. Theoretically that should work. Luke might know a better idea or he might have some kind of fix in the works I am not sure.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
OK, not the most advanced miner here.

Win7 64 bit running BFGminer 3.4.0 64bit. on Slush's

I recently began building up my mini-wannabe army of Erupters: only 18 so far. All into USB 3.0 ports.

9 Erupters per 10 port, powered, USB3.0 Dyconn hub[10th is fan]. The specs i read say this hub can power whats in it.

However, BFGminer wont run more than 15 of these ASIC Erupters. At least, it only shows 0-14 and associated info(hasrates etc)

Sometimes it will only run half my Erupters, 9, but random ones from each hub, not just 9 from one and none from the other.

I have what I am told are the correct driver(s),CP210x...
All 18 appear in my Device Manager

Shortcut commands:
-o stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u [user] -p [password] -G -S all --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100

Any insight into this problem would be very much appreciated,
Ive been trying to fix this on my own for a while, so now im here more or less begging the cool kids for advice =]
thanks.

edit: also, when BFGminer starts, it often says i cannon access certain COM ports. Seems to be different ones each time.

Unplug and re plug your USB hubs with the miners while the computer is on and without BFGMiner running and let them all light up before starting BFGMiner.

Then use -S erupter:all instead of all the Icarus options. 
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 250
Is there any way to determine the BSB2ab style device names from API replies? I can't use ProcID, because the naming scheme differs when there are more chips. For example, I have BSB devices with 16 or 32 chips. ProcID 0 on BSB0 is BSB0a, but ProcID 0 on BSB2 is BSB2aa.

This would be useful because --set-device use the letter naming scheme as arguments when setting options for individual chips.

I realized that the stats reply has the naming scheme I desired, but curiously, using DEVS+STATS in a customsummarypage on miner.php results in all chips from BSB2 being left out completely from the tables. It's the only device I have with 32 chips instead of 16.

So with just DEVS, I can see BSB0 (16 chips), BSB1 (16 chips), BSB2 (32 chips) & BSB3 (16 chips). If I change the DEVS to DEVS+STATS, for some reason BSB2 is skipped. Setting $per_proc to true or false makes no difference; either BSB2 or all chips from BSB2 are missing.

I'm thinking there might be something wrong with the join_get_field function's ProcID -> lowercase letter conversion, when there are two letters instead of one. Looks like the code just converts the ProcID to a letter, but that won't match the naming scheme with two letters. Doesn't look like it's easy to fix, because you just can't know whether ProcID 0 should be converted to a or aa, until you know how many procs there actually are in that device.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
especially if you are running multiple pools that have different coin...
This is not supported, nor planned to be supported.
It wrecks havoc on the internals of the mining framework, so it wouldn't surprise me if it fried your CPU or caused your GPU to explode or anything.

As the README says:
Quote
Do not use on multiple block chains at the same time!
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
I plan to rewrite all the work distribution code at some point to complete GBT support.

I wasn't all that familiar with the quota system, but I played around with it a little, and it sort of does what I want, but it jumps around the pools too much; 5-10 hashes to one pool, then it switches to another pool...

I'm envisioning something where you could set the quota, and then tell it to mine at least xx minutes to one pool before switching, especially if you are running multiple pools that have different coin... when jumping from one coin to another, BFG seems to hang and have to re-tune itself to the other coin, which is time consuming lowering the hashing rate... if you could stay on one pool for xx minutes or longer, then this re-tuning to a different coin would be reduced.

For example, I would like to mine ASC, OSC, TGC, UNO, XJC and ZET together, but currently with the quota system it just jumps around too much and has to re-tune for each coin... the only viable options right now is to go with "rotate xx minutes" and you are stuck with the global time in minuted you set... if you could specify the pool mining time for each pool, then we would be closer to what I am looking for...

Anyway, just work on your high priority requirements and when the time comes and you can work on this, see what you can do with either the quota system or the rotate option.

Thanks.

P.S. Keep up the awesome work, your miner is the best in my opinion.
Pages:
Jump to: