Hi, what was ICO price of this coin? is it on Polo???
@kame.japan2, the ICO price was 0.00002061 BTC. RISE is not on Poloniex, but on Bittrex and Yobit. Thanks for asking.
Topic: [old thread] - RISE | DPOS | APPS & DAPPS - page 160. (Read 653289 times)
@kame.japan2, the ICO price was 0.00002061 BTC. RISE is not on Poloniex, but on Bittrex and Yobit. Thanks for asking.
Hi, what was ICO price of this coin? is it on Polo???
why no commits to GitHub though, strange way of working...check out for example Waves platform GitHub, crazy commits daily. Or is rise seriously just stall development till lisk team pushes updates pffff,
Their devs are missing, alty is missing, they run away with those funds. What a pity.
All this smells like trouble en conflict. The big buywall at 1k satoshi also gone. I sold my RISE. I expect the price to drop.
same here only dev news is: soon and working on it => in the meantime weeks are flying by and buy support is fading fast
there was also promise to update the rise.vision website few weeks ago. I didn't see anything news on it also
why no commits to GitHub though, strange way of working...check out for example Waves platform GitHub, crazy commits daily. Or is rise seriously just stall development till lisk team pushes updates pffff,
Their devs are missing, alty is missing, they run away with those funds. What a pity.
I posted on Twitter just yesterday, there are new commits coming very soon related to delegate nodes and new SDK's.
https://twitter.com/CryptoPioneer/status/776809107445735424
Please remember that development takes time to complete properly.
why no commits to GitHub though, strange way of working...check out for example Waves platform GitHub, crazy commits daily. Or is rise seriously just stall development till lisk team pushes updates pffff,
Their devs are missing, alty is missing, they run away with those funds. What a pity.
All this smells like trouble en conflict. The big buywall at 1k satoshi also gone. I sold my RISE. I expect the price to drop.
I'm usually pretty patient about this sort of thing, but I'm getting frustrated with Rise. The updates merely say, "we are almost finished with...." or "we are in the middle of...." An update gives expected dates of completion and details. We should see some movement to justify the project.
It's a two-edged sword. People want frequent updates, but the result of this is that it's often going to be a report of ongoing progress of some of the same things that were reported in the update before, simply because the things the team is working on require more than just a few weeks. More frequent updates doesn't cause development to magically be accelerated. It still takes time to develop something that functions well, is robust, feature rich, secure, stable, scalable. Rushing developments prematurely to market without extensive auditing doesn't do anyone favors either.
Expect audit reports to be released on Code and Web security in the next 2 weeks.
I don't mind the same things being repeated a couple of times. What I do mind is handing a dev team any amount of BTC and seeing almost nothing happen. I never invest what I can't afford to lose, this is getting more than a little foolish. Things should be moving more swiftly than they are. It's a fact and I don't know that anybody here is happy with this.
why no commits to GitHub though, strange way of working...check out for example Waves platform GitHub, crazy commits daily. Or is rise seriously just stall development till lisk team pushes updates pffff,
Their devs are missing, alty is missing, they run away with those funds. What a pity.
why no commits to GitHub though, strange way of working...check out for example Waves platform GitHub, crazy commits daily. Or is rise seriously just stall development till lisk team pushes updates pffff,
I'm usually pretty patient about this sort of thing, but I'm getting frustrated with Rise. The updates merely say, "we are almost finished with...." or "we are in the middle of...." An update gives expected dates of completion and details. We should see some movement to justify the project.
It's a two-edged sword. People want frequent updates, but the result of this is that it's often going to be a report of ongoing progress of some of the same things that were reported in the update before, simply because the things the team is working on require more than just a few weeks. More frequent updates doesn't cause development to magically be accelerated. It still takes time to develop something that functions well, is robust, feature rich, secure, stable, scalable. Rushing developments prematurely to market without extensive auditing doesn't do anyone favors either.
Expect audit reports to be released on Code and Web security in the next 2 weeks.
I'm usually pretty patient about this sort of thing, but I'm getting frustrated with Rise. The updates merely say, "we are almost finished with...." or "we are in the middle of...." An update gives expected dates of completion and details. We should see some movement to justify the project.
Here you go, gentlemen (and any ladies out there):
http://forum.rise.vision/topic/55/dev-team-end-of-week-update
http://forum.rise.vision/topic/55/dev-team-end-of-week-update
VERY slow progress , can a competent dev who can get the forging going not be hired with all the funds??? taking 6 months+ to get the coin working seems somewhat insane imo.
no need to rush, it was vacation time. what would you do with 1M+ $ dev funds
The beauty of Rise is that we are going for quality, not just trying to pump out subpar results. You can stay up-to-date on all the latest info at http://forum.rise.vision/category/3/blogs and McVenture has done a great job of updating you here as well.
In other news, did anyone see this group out of Shanghai? http://www.coindesk.com/new-blockchain-alliance-forms-shanghai/ Just thought it was cool
and what about a github where we can see real development, nope, because there is none.
https://github.com/RiseVision - we have been testing the past few weeks. You'll see code changes once we're satisfied with testing
confirmed, no real development happening, this is all just a puppet show to delay and mask the dev cashing out all that btc.
Yes, that's why we've been so transparent
Have a nice weekend! VERY slow progress , can a competent dev who can get the forging going not be hired with all the funds??? taking 6 months+ to get the coin working seems somewhat insane imo.
no need to rush, it was vacation time. what would you do with 1M+ $ dev funds
The beauty of Rise is that we are going for quality, not just trying to pump out subpar results. You can stay up-to-date on all the latest info at http://forum.rise.vision/category/3/blogs and McVenture has done a great job of updating you here as well.
In other news, did anyone see this group out of Shanghai? http://www.coindesk.com/new-blockchain-alliance-forms-shanghai/ Just thought it was cool
and what about a github where we can see real development, nope, because there is none.
https://github.com/RiseVision - we have been testing the past few weeks. You'll see code changes once we're satisfied with testing
confirmed, no real development happening, this is all just a puppet show to delay and mask the dev cashing out all that btc.
if there was real coding happening it would show up on github, instead you employed a bunch of chubby beginner coder noobs for a 1.4million dollar company.
VERY slow progress , can a competent dev who can get the forging going not be hired with all the funds??? taking 6 months+ to get the coin working seems somewhat insane imo.
no need to rush, it was vacation time. what would you do with 1M+ $ dev funds
The beauty of Rise is that we are going for quality, not just trying to pump out subpar results. You can stay up-to-date on all the latest info at http://forum.rise.vision/category/3/blogs and McVenture has done a great job of updating you here as well.
In other news, did anyone see this group out of Shanghai? http://www.coindesk.com/new-blockchain-alliance-forms-shanghai/ Just thought it was cool
and what about a github where we can see real development, nope, because there is none.
https://github.com/RiseVision - we have been testing the past few weeks. You'll see code changes once we're satisfied with testing
VERY slow progress , can a competent dev who can get the forging going not be hired with all the funds??? taking 6 months+ to get the coin working seems somewhat insane imo.
no need to rush, it was vacation time. what would you do with 1M+ $ dev funds
The beauty of Rise is that we are going for quality, not just trying to pump out subpar results. You can stay up-to-date on all the latest info at http://forum.rise.vision/category/3/blogs and McVenture has done a great job of updating you here as well.
In other news, did anyone see this group out of Shanghai? http://www.coindesk.com/new-blockchain-alliance-forms-shanghai/ Just thought it was cool
and what about a github where we can see real development, nope, because there is none.
VERY slow progress , can a competent dev who can get the forging going not be hired with all the funds??? taking 6 months+ to get the coin working seems somewhat insane imo.
no need to rush, it was vacation time. what would you do with 1M+ $ dev funds
The beauty of Rise is that we are going for quality, not just trying to pump out subpar results. You can stay up-to-date on all the latest info at http://forum.rise.vision/category/3/blogs and McVenture has done a great job of updating you here as well.
In other news, did anyone see this group out of Shanghai? http://www.coindesk.com/new-blockchain-alliance-forms-shanghai/ Just thought it was cool
VERY slow progress , can a competent dev who can get the forging going not be hired with all the funds??? taking 6 months+ to get the coin working seems somewhat insane imo.
no need to rush, it was vacation time. what would you do with 1M+ $ dev funds
VERY slow progress , can a competent dev who can get the forging going not be hired with all the funds??? taking 6 months+ to get the coin working seems somewhat insane imo.
no need to rush, it was vacation time. what would you do with 1M+ $ dev funds
VERY slow progress , can a competent dev who can get the forging going not be hired with all the funds??? taking 6 months+ to get the coin working seems somewhat insane imo.
Absolutely. No developement here. I am happy that sold my coins in the beginning.
I had been support your coin ,but I think you are too lazy to develpot the project.
Jump to: