Topic: [OLD][CSC]CasinoCoin ♠ A Digital Currency For The Regulated Online Gaming Sector - page 24. (Read 343087 times)

Fantastic !!! There were already CSC moves in the blockchain, in 1969 ... 


Timestamp                                                                   Hash                                                            Amount (CSC)
31st Dec 1969 18:00:00   2fd3b2c314bec0069acc9e5cff32d3357c5b39392497b3e407efc1f77dfe0f1b   + 1000.00000000

Man you moved onto bigger bubbles, I see massive pain for ETH holders, FCT is not even a block chain.

So that's why I am chiming in CSC is the casino coin, but not in the way you suspect.

CSC needs to become a general promoter of casino projects that have ROI.

It primary function is just being a surviving block chain, that's the main value.

It can build value by being a social or public platform for finding casino projects.

Specifically spinning out tokens.

Looking it from this perspective then Yes, no anonymity is needed. Thanks for the explanation.

I think that would push CSC into an 'illegal usage only' direction ..... i think the legal casino business is actually struggling with KYC and AML requirements. That is also the reason of my 'Proof of Gambling Result' comments. If we can show the business that CSC can actually help them solving KYC and AML we have a business case.

What do You guys think about adding anonymity (privacy of transactions) to CSC? For example to the Pro version. Is it even possible?

I am currently also working on some examples on pushing gambling results onto the blockchain, .... kind of adding a 'Proof of Gambling Result' feature. That could potentially increase  the need for an increase in block size in the future so yes i guess we need to consider the possibilities. I guess that Litecoin is a good proof of concept for that and we can look on adding that in the future. On the other hand looking at the diff and getting the blocktime closer to its projected 30 seconds would already give CSC the possibility to process 20x more transactions as BTC.

There is also an other thing that has been on my mind lately, .... the Qt license conditions keep changing and move towards commercial applications more and more. Professionally i already switched to Code::Blocks and wxWidgets because of that and i really started to appreciate that IDE.

So i might consider migrating from Qt to Code::Blocks when i separate the source code into Core, CLI and GUI projects. Currently nobody else does development on the C++ source code but would there be any objections against that?

I guess i then would also create a 'Lite' and 'Pro' version of the GUI Wallet where the lite version would only support basic send/receive/addressbook options and the pro version would include all current features but also more mining and blockchain info, .... kind of adding the insight like search features into the wallet pro version. Because of legal issues we will never add gambling directly into the wallet but if all the above is achieved we could also create a desktop casino application that connects directly to the blockchain quite easily and creating some white label applications might give CSC a real push!

Where do you stand on Segwit/UASF ?

I understand we don't have a block size problem etc but it may be good to think about this now instead of in hindsight.

I hope to start working on the C++ code tree again in the coming months, ... i have the following on my wish list:

• Separating core (lib), CLI and Qt wallet source code into different projects
• Implementing reverse blockchain download using checkpoints to speed up initial wallet sync for new users
• Re-evaluate possible diff options as i am convinced that there must be a better algorithm than the current one
• Looking at adding some Insight server items straight into the CSC daemon and rebuild the Insight API on top off the C++ daemon instead of its own NodeJS implementation

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

And now you are here bagging the project and its developers out, in the hope that it never gets anywhere. Thats so you can feel safe in your reckless decision to sell 1mill coins. Am i correct, if you are to be truly honest with yourself? Or am i way off in my assumption?

I don't want to start a fight, i just want you to be respectful and exit the project properly like you seem to be wanting to. But sure, bag them out, not like its going to change anything. You sold your coins but someone bought them too. I encourage you to move on properly and respectfully, thanks. You have been heard.

Sure, Malta is waiting for some incompetent one man band who cannot even launch one product within 2 years.

Any future blockchain gaming payment solution is likely to be based on ETH.  It has all the necessary features, including a sub-minute block time, and it can easily incorporate all the features of the Prypto closed loop system, which never took off.

Face it, CSC is dead.  

I sold my coins to the poster who offered 5 BTC for them a few posts above. The trade went through on Alcurex.  I was subsequently able to sell a further 100k on Cryptopia to some hopeful but misguided bidders.

Already made 20% gains after reinvesting them in Factom and ETH.

You can waste your time waiting for anything to happen in CSC (hint: never) or make money in the ongoing race for which coin will become the next BTC.  

Malta loves blockchain an csc gaming solution is just what they are waiting for...

Anybody has connections to Malta? They want to become cryptovalley and especially legal crypto gaming paradise 

Hmmmm who is the new owner of that 1m csc coins? Barbeq you finally sold?

I'm sorry but I am not able to follow you.  I do not understand the professional capacity of executives, generally speaking?  I was an executive of a $200m company myself and now I work with top executives of a multi billion dollar global company.

What all this has to do with Prypto or CSC, I have no idea.  Prypto does not have any "executives".  It is a one man band led by an individual with good ideas but lack of ability to execute. This is the typical scenario in the vast majority of start up enterprises. There is a common saying "ideas are a dime a dozen".  

Over the years, I have worked with many employees, entrepreneurs, investors. Most of my friends are seriously wealthy; I'm only reasonably wealthy, as I made the mistake of staying too long in a salaried (albeit well paid) job.  What successful people all have in common is that they deliver.  What I have learned is that there are two types of people: those that dream and talk and blame everybody else, and those that deliver.  There is never any crossover between those two, ever. I suppose I need not say which category the individual behind Prypto belongs to.  

dear things can not be decide whether they are for long time or for short time but only our thinking and work over it makes it so.

I have 7 connections at my client so the problem must be on Your side. Try what LongAndShort suggested and let us know.

I have sent you a PM.

Deleted your peers.dat and restarted the client?

I saw that yea but for some reason mine only has 1 connection.

Ill buy your 1 mil coins for 5 btc