in the spirit of civility. without insult lets clarify your mindset
Given the choice between "you have total freedom, but there's a cost to pay" versus "you have less freedom, but it's cheaper", I'm always going to opt for the former.
firstly
you do not want freedom. because one persons freedom is another persons invasion, trespass, theft, harm, displacement.
you cannot tell the difference between freedom vs right of consent
YOU dont beleive in consent and think it does not/should not exist.
(your "permissionless" mantra)
you say you do not prefer 'less freedom but cheaper'?.. yet
how come you prefer a subnetwork that is based on partnership signing and middlemen routing for "cheap"... meaning more permissions required(signatures, liquidity borrowing and availability for routing)
this is not censorship. this is consent.(a word you plead ignorance of understanding)
bitcoin has more freedom of payment transfer than your favoured subnetwork YOU prefer/promote to want people to use
so you are promoting a subnetwork that has 'less freedom for cheap'
you are the one telling people to go use other networks and certain services
you are telling people to do things that costs others extra on bitcoin or promote them to use other things that are not bitcoin. (making you the authoritarian)
you want a small dozen group to be free to reign control of the masses, where you want the masses to have no chance of consent/choice.
that said
bitcoin is a consent network
majority nodes cannot move value without the utxo owners consent(signed tx)
individuals didnot(past tense) have ability to change/edit bitcoin protocol/data without majority consent(consensus 2009-2016)
bitcoin is a consent network but you do not like this
you want the consent process weakened/removed (you love the soft consensus of 'backward compatible' false description.. which in reality is the abuse to not require majority consent to activate new rules)
you say you love freedom but you are not telling people to independently learn and research. but instead you are trying to ban users and get their posts deleted if they disagree with you
even things like mixers. knowing that exchanges treat mixers and your favoured subnetworks and altcoins as red flags, you try to push people into using them, which has consequences
not for their benefit but so you can gain from your victim recruits that follow your advise
yes you want freedom to be an outlaw and rule breaker. i get that. but you dont care about the freedom or consent of the masses
so until you can find one narrative that can clarify your mindset that does not go back and forth contradicting itself. (your current motives shows absolute malicious intent on other users and the network). i will continue to call you an idiot. .. but realise it is civil because i can think of hundreds of other uncivilised words to describe you
..
so
until you can understand consent. proof of ownership, proof of transfer.
(consensus payment network)
until you can understand the BIG difference between consent vs censor
until you can understand the BIG difference between the consent system of 2009-2016 vs 2017-now
where by now nodes no longer need to be ready to verify new rules for new rules to activate, which is bad security
i will until you can understand basic things.. will continue to be civil by describing people like you as idiots. because its describing you, not insulting you. its more civil then some hundreds of other things i could be using to insult you
you plead ignorant at times and refuse to want to learn. thus the description is accurate
if you were a newbie making the mistakes you make. so be it.. but you have been around bitcoin concepts long enough to know better. so showing ignorance. earns you the idiot tag
when you advertise things that harm others. note that i can call you many harsher things.
and me calling you an idiot is civil in comparison to what you really sound like
if you do not want to be tagged as an idiot.
stop sounding like one by
learning actual bitcoin concepts(do your own research),
admit to the flaws. faults, bugs, harms on others, which things can cause others
not the ill-conceived concepts your buddy group prefer to push onto the network/community
if i was uncivilised you would receive proper insulting words to be called
oh..
and before responding.
you might want to do some research on your post history vs my post history
by doing a word count of the library of insulting words.(real insulting words)
and see exactly who is more harsher to who
then do a search on who makes more demands on who, about their access/involvement of the network
by counting which are civilised (learn/research) vs uncivilised (F**K off)
you may learn it is you trying to make more people leave the bitcoin network, not be involved in securing the network via harsh insults if they dont want to leave bitcoin, or if they do not want bad flaws, bugs be trojaned in by a central group(s)