i want to talk about the dead weight data bloat.. but yet again a social drama queen group want to make it all about "franky"
silly fools will do anything to resist learning. researching, thinking.. and it seems "franky" is to blame for their ignorance
1, protocols got relaxed
Define protocol relaxation. I only understand soft forks and hard forks. And I know that if there are only soft forks, rules become stricter, not the opposite.
you know very well about how consensus got softened you have been loudy promoting the "backward compatability" flaw that allows new things in without mass node consent
(backward compatibility translates to 'abstinence is consent')
you know that older nodes treat new things as valid by default even if they cannot fully verify the content
you know the flaw. you love the flaw dont play dumb now
3. seriously blackhatcoiner you seem to be throwing yourself back into supporting the same crap ideals as your forum-wife again. saying things she says without actually thinking for yourself. what happened did she pay you off to stay together
Seriously, cut the crap.
Stop this horseshit before I begin to turn nasty. I don't know how you've come to the conclusion that I'm blindly following DooMAD's ideas and perspective, but I've got to tell you: I don't.
The fact that members make perfect sense from his writings in comparison with yours should tell you a lot. He happens to be a lot more voice of reason than your perpetually refuted ass.
you
deny following doomad then
admit you follow doomad all in the same paragraph
as for what he says being reasonable.. reasonable to WHOM oh yea corporate paid centralist groups wanting alternative networks to become middlemen services for users so they can take a fee from users, whilst trying to ruin bitcoin to help push people to alternative networks
again reasonable to whom is doomads rhetoric?
as for refuting
show me the code, data, and statistics that back up you and his rhetoric
yes your echo chamber crew can repeat "franky is wrong" but you can never back up how or why. unless its just some "i dont understand what your saying"
try to escape your echo chanber of confirmation bias of idiot group..
do some real learning about source DATA (not social drama)
such as reading code. reading bips reading moderation polices and development plans for the core roadmap..
read how things work from source code. not social clubs
difference between doomad and a rational person
doomad tries to recruit people and control people trying to tell them what to say and where to say it. including those who disagree with him
i simple say go do some real research and learn for your own risk awareness
if you dont want to learn for your own independent value risk and usage awareness. thats on you... but atleast try,, not for my benefit. but for your own
if your getting angry and upset that i say 'stop sounding like an echo and instead do some research'.. then take some real time thinking about what you are actually angry about
because its now seemingly like you are angry either by:
a. fear of learning
b. fear of losing a loved ones relationship
c. fear of realising you have been a follower of social drama queenery
do you know whats great about doing your own research instead of relying on social queens
its the fact that you can do your own research without needing social queens
give it a try.. just dont use doomad as your main source where he will not back up any of his rhetoric with code/data/stats..
so try some independent research.. emphasis independent.. for your own benefit. not some buddy