If I want to be official (neutral) about your claims I'll want to ask if you have evidence to back your claims ? Or it's just out of frustration from the system you're boiling your anger!
In any society where there are strong individuals and weak institutions. In otherwords, individuals that are stronger than state institution's, have it at the back of your mind that such society is deranged and can't function properly under the rule of law and sanctity.
The system was originally built to fail so there's no height of agitation, clamouring that is going to make any positive impact or change not until the fetters behind the creation of the system has been pulled down or delinked and a new chapter is rebuild but this can only be made possible on the blood of true nationalists, activists and patriots.
If we continue for dis matta we go explain tire, no evidence.
It got me thinking in what sort of evidence you want about this.
If you are provided with the required evidence would you be able to stand firm for the justice of the complainant? Or you would just enjoy it as a point of arguements?
If I may ask you, what do you think of the state "don't suffocate the poor" "Let the poor breathe" made my Mr president Bola Amed Tinubu? You think them at the top levels doesn't know how inconvincing they are being to the common masses?
Do you still need evidence of the police brutalities?
Do you need to be told that the top level personels feels above the law where a one man with his convoy could drive a one way and going against the traffic controls?
You don't think about why guardian security person's molests and oppresses the common man on his mobile where he is expected to either slow down or pack by til just one sole mans convoy is passed?
Do you ever not wondered why the government from the local levels, State levels and of course the federal levels would be so interested if a mayhem is happened to a so V.I.P personal than a common man?
You ever don't have think about why would a foreigner would be treated as a 1st class citizen here while you an indigenous one from here is treated as a no classification in this country?
Or is it the so called INEC who is supposed to stand as a neutral bodies against political interests of an individual during elections? If you argue about this, why didn't INEC focused on defending itself instead biasing to the other parties while channelling to defend it's interest of the other party during the just concluded Tribunal?
You need evidence that one high rated politician/richmans life matters more than a common man whereas they have most security personels supposed to be on duties in regards to wide range to assure a massive security guaranteed instead they keep them within themselves and territories for self defence and guardians?
Take it or not to whom it may concern, we fed by the reminant of the politicians and the riches otherwise the common man's existence is not mattered in this country 9ja