At least your rationale, explanation, and accusations are simple and easy to follow. That's what makes all of this such a plausible story!
Psych.
Topic: Ongoing Civil War in U.S.A. corporation - page 80. (Read 410335 times)
9/11 is not a real conspiracy?
GTFO
GTFO
Why do I need to have my own ideas when it comes to exposing fraud and hoaxes?
I have already come to my own conclusions; I think it is you who is lacking in ideas originating from within yourself.
I have already come to my own conclusions; I think it is you who is lacking in ideas originating from within yourself.
You're ok with not having any original thoughts, but being mind-controlled by the government? You're really ok with that?
Because that's who's coming up with these ridiculous conspiracy theories - the government hopes that by publishing the weird, far out and bizarre conspiracies that no one will take the real conspiracies seriously. And you, my friend, are part of the problem, not the solution.
Finally somebody that uses what is supposed to be up and running in their head.
But seriously , you're wasting your time in this thread with these guys.
You posted nothing to investigate.
Do you need me to post it again? I am happy to point you in the right direction, but you are reluctant to return the favor when it comes to your own dubious claims.
Instead of pointing me in the right direction, you attack me personally. Very classy.
Tea Party is now being demonize in video game ‘BATTLEFIELD HARDLINE’
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/shoot-racist-tea-partiers-in-battlefield-hardline-739457
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/shoot-racist-tea-partiers-in-battlefield-hardline-739457
Sorry to see that one, they say the game used to be non-political, but now has changed.
The 'Heavy Weight' task force is formed in the U.S.A.
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/08/14/fbi-80-percent-of-police-officers-are-overweight/
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/08/14/fbi-80-percent-of-police-officers-are-overweight/
Tea Party is now being demonize in video game ‘BATTLEFIELD HARDLINE’
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/shoot-racist-tea-partiers-in-battlefield-hardline-739457
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/shoot-racist-tea-partiers-in-battlefield-hardline-739457
Just one example:
Sen Corker vs. Seth Meyers = Their ears are dramatically different.
...so what do you have to say to that?
Sen Corker vs. Seth Meyers = Their ears are dramatically different.
...so what do you have to say to that?
Even one match on the wellaware1 site is big news.
So what now?...
You literally believe that multiple pairs of famous people are actually "the same person", is that correct?
You posted nothing to investigate. Just crazy conspiracies that the government has planted.
You are proposing that "the government" is planting conspiracies?
Where is the evidence for that?
Where do I go to investigate?
You posted nothing but ad-hominems and speculation, so you better put up or shut up.
Why? Trying to silence me? Are you a government shill?
You posted nothing to investigate. Just crazy conspiracies that the government has planted.
You are proposing that "the government" is planting conspiracies?
Where is the evidence for that?
Where do I go to investigate?
You posted nothing but ad-hominems and speculation, so you better put up or shut up.
Keep it up, government stooge.
Another ad-hominem?
I guess I win the debate.
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance"
You posted nothing to investigate. Just crazy conspiracies that the government has planted.
However, feel free to remain ignorant. As you write:
Quote
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance"
Keep it up, government stooge.
Another ad-hominem?
I guess I win the debate.
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance"
Just one example:
Sen Corker vs. Seth Meyers = Their ears are dramatically different.
...so what do you have to say to that?
Sen Corker vs. Seth Meyers = Their ears are dramatically different.
...so what do you have to say to that?
Even one match on the wellaware1 site is big news.
So what now? You will disprove all of the credible ones? OK, I will wait for you.
Keep it up, government stooge.
Just one example:
Sen Corker vs. Seth Meyers = Their ears are dramatically different.
...so what do you have to say to that?
Sen Corker vs. Seth Meyers = Their ears are dramatically different.
...so what do you have to say to that?
Even one match on the wellaware1 site is big news.
So what now? You will disprove all of the credible ones? OK, I will wait for you.
And you don't need to do facial comparisons to see that there are actors involved in hoax events.
Seriously?
Some of those people have massive differences in their looks. Why are you blowing all the "credibility" you had built up?
Some of those people have massive differences in their looks. Why are you blowing all the "credibility" you had built up?
Biometrics are as serious as it gets; especially when it involves the ears.
Some of those people are slam-dunk matches and it is BIG NEWS; so what do you have to say to that?
Just one example:
Sen Corker vs. Seth Meyers = Their ears are dramatically different.
...so what do you have to say to that?
Sounds like a personal attack (ad hominem).
This is
Highly relevant
This is
Highly relevant
Why do I need to have my own ideas when it comes to exposing fraud and hoaxes?
I have already come to my own conclusions; I think it is you who is lacking in ideas originating from within yourself.
I have already come to my own conclusions; I think it is you who is lacking in ideas originating from within yourself.
You're ok with not having any original thoughts, but being mind-controlled by the government? You're really ok with that?
Because that's who's coming up with these ridiculous conspiracy theories - the government hopes that by publishing the weird, far out and bizarre conspiracies that no one will take the real conspiracies seriously. And you, my friend, are part of the problem, not the solution.
Why do I need to have my own ideas when it comes to exposing fraud and hoaxes?
I have already come to my own conclusions after judging the evidence, but still I am asking you about YOUR conclusions.
Do you have ideas "of your own" about the big three?
Find some time to evaluate the evidence.
I have already come to my own conclusions after judging the evidence, but still I am asking you about YOUR conclusions.
Do you have ideas "of your own" about the big three?
Find some time to evaluate the evidence.
Groan. I come here to read and discuss things, not click on links and watch videos. Are you just parrotting someone else's ideas or do you have some ideas of your own?
Funny, I was about to ask you the same thing... Why don't you tell me what you think about the big three? Here, I will throw another bone:
I'm not going to waste time on Facebook. Why don't you just present the main points here?
I'm not going to waste time explaining it to you; why don't you just look at the link?
I will throw you this bone though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AMIyw4BaW8&src_vid=oYgKXr8vN-E&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_3395276241
Groan. I come here to read and discuss things, not click on links and watch videos. Are you just parrotting someone else's ideas or do you have some ideas of your own?
Jump to: