It's unfortunate that anyone for example can have 10s or 100s of regular users with given positive feed back, or years of reputable history. But all it takes is one person on the DT trust list to be angered or leave a negative trust, and your account is permanently flagged negative/red.
I'm not trying to hijack this thread, and this will be my last response unless a new thread devoted specifically to this issue is opened up, but this statement needs to be addressed.
All that positive feedback you've received over the years is nice, but you should know damn well that there are quite a few members who've had the same and ended up getting tagged by DT members. Also, all your past feedback has nothing to do with your actions while you had Lutpin managing your campaign. You're basically saying that you're a victim because of your trust history, and you are quite mistaken about that.
Anyone who's thinking about joining one of your campaigns should be warned about you. Part of it was indeed Lutpin's fault, but you treated all your campaign participants like shit by not communicating with them to keep them apprised of what was happening--and there's a good reason for that. You were doing
nothing to get the campaign participants paid. They were advertising for you in the hope that eventually they'd get paid. They didn't speak up
because of your reputation, which you used to your advantage. A bunch of signature campaigners who are very likely desperate for money aren't going to complain when the campaign was started by a Legendary member who's been here since 2011.
For weeks you did nothing to make things right and finally when Lutpin got off his ass and did his job, some participants started complaining that they hadn't been paid for all of the posts they'd made.
And after being told that there would be a new campaign manager, now you told people that this wasn't a campaign manager transition at all, that these are totally new campaigns. You thus fucked over members who had faith in you after they found out that they're no longer in one of your campaigns. That's lousy management on your part, at best. You earned that feedback I left, my friend. It's unfortunate other DT members apparently don't feel the same and keep silent about all of this.
Having said all of that, I have no doubt that Hhampuz will do an excellent job as your campaign manager. It's not him I have concerns about: it is you, Lightlord. I'm hoping your bad practices don't start affecting him and his reputation, since you're basically his boss. Don't know him personally, but I think he has enough integrity to work for you and not end up pulling any funny stuff at your behest.
Edit:
I get where you are coming from Pharmacist and I'm just here trying to do my best.
I happen to believe that, and as I said I have no issue with you whatsoever. The issue of restarting the campaign without including the previous ones isn't the big issue anyway, although when you say that there were very few posters left at the end,
why do you think that was? The members who'd stopped posting were probably very happy with the way the campaigns used to run but had given up after the BS that lightlord and Lutpin pulled. They did the smart thing, but I would guess that many of them were loyal to 777Coin and Bitvest for quite a while and probably should have been invited back.
Whatever. Moving on from that, I've seen how you manage campaigns and you do an excellent job. All I'm saying is that you've got a boss as well, and I'm hoping none of his previous behaviors get repeated. But since the debacle of those two campaigns resulted from a combination of lightlord and Lutpin's actions (and inactions), I have faith that the new campaigns run far more smoothly. Good luck.