Topic: [OPEN] BM1380 Worldwide Chip Groupbuy - page 3. (Read 7327 times)
I would be in for at least 50 depending on final cost of miner USB would be great. I would also have to pay in USD
Groupbuy is now open
3-500 chips depending on total cost 
Put my nickname in for
150 chips ( 1.8 BTC ) // 0.012BTC Per chip
As every chip can hash 2.8GH/s @ 1.1v,
total 420 Giga for 150 chips.
150 chips ( 1.8 BTC ) // 0.012BTC Per chip
As every chip can hash 2.8GH/s @ 1.1v,
total 420 Giga for 150 chips.
Have you filed GB for first 10k chip ?
How many clients want pay premium for short lead time?
The orders haven't been openedHow many clients want pay premium for short lead time?
Yet but we do have a large around 7-8k already reserved. In regards to the lead time fee I feel it makes sense to take that option.
Yes.
500 chips but depends on the price price after miner assembly. If you could give a rough estimate in terms of + % - % that would help me alot.
Currently we are waiting on more information from Bitmain before we can get a quote.
500 chips but depends on the price price after miner assembly. If you could give a rough estimate in terms of + % - % that would help me alot.
Have you filed GB for first 10k chip ?
How many clients want pay premium for short lead time?
The orders haven't been openedHow many clients want pay premium for short lead time?
Yet but we do have a large around 7-8k already reserved. In regards to the lead time fee I feel it makes sense to take that option.
Have you filed GB for first 10k chip ?
How many clients want pay premium for short lead time?
The orders haven't been openedHow many clients want pay premium for short lead time?
Yet but we do have a large around 7-8k already reserved. In regards to the lead time fee I feel it makes sense to take that option.
Have you filed GB for first 10k chip ?
How many clients want pay premium for short lead time?
How many clients want pay premium for short lead time?
192 chips either S1 or rack size design 
We have around 7k interest in chips so far.
That's encouraging. Keep us updated on the status. :-)
Put me down for 64 chips.
I would also like to get the engineering data ASAP as I might want to try to do some design work.
I would also like to get the engineering data ASAP as I might want to try to do some design work.
I probably would but I still need to know about the actual miner designs/costs.
Yes we are working on getting that figured out now.
I probably would but I still need to know about the actual miner designs/costs.
Would everyone be interested in this?
Thanks and PM answered.
Updated with a newly added policy, Paying extra 10% can accelerate the lead time to 4 weeks.
We have already made the documents we think is completed for building a miner with our chip. We will send to some community member to review for two or three days, and we can know whether there is something that will make other EE confused or hard to understand. Then we release all the documents to the public.
My initial response is yes, but if the extra money prevents us from getting enough interest to make the buy in the first place... 10k chip is a lot of interest to gather, and I've only seen about 2k initial interest in this thread. :-(Bitmain, i send you a PM about the chips, can you please take 2 minute and answer?
Thanks and PM answered.
Updated with a newly added policy, Paying extra 10% can accelerate the lead time to 4 weeks.
We have already made the documents we think is completed for building a miner with our chip. We will send to some community member to review for two or three days, and we can know whether there is something that will make other EE confused or hard to understand. Then we release all the documents to the public.
Would everyone be interested in this?
Thanks and PM answered.
Updated with a newly added policy, Paying extra 10% can accelerate the lead time to 4 weeks.
We have already made the documents we think is completed for building a miner with our chip. We will send to some community member to review for two or three days, and we can know whether there is something that will make other EE confused or hard to understand. Then we release all the documents to the public.
My initial response is yes, but if the extra money prevents us from getting enough interest to make the buy in the first place... 10k chip is a lot of interest to gather, and I've only seen about 2k initial interest in this thread. :-( Bitmain, i send you a PM about the chips, can you please take 2 minute and answer?
Thanks and PM answered.
Updated with a newly added policy, Paying extra 10% can accelerate the lead time to 4 weeks.
We have already made the documents we think is completed for building a miner with our chip. We will send to some community member to review for two or three days, and we can know whether there is something that will make other EE confused or hard to understand. Then we release all the documents to the public.
Would everyone be interested in this?
Thanks and PM answered.
Updated with a newly added policy, Paying extra 10% can accelerate the lead time to 4 weeks.
We have already made the documents we think is completed for building a miner with our chip. We will send to some community member to review for two or three days, and we can know whether there is something that will make other EE confused or hard to understand. Then we release all the documents to the public.
Bitmain, i send you a PM about the chips, can you please take 2 minute and answer?
Thanks and PM answered.
Updated with a newly added policy, Paying extra 10% can accelerate the lead time to 4 weeks.
We have already made the documents we think is completed for building a miner with our chip. We will send to some community member to review for two or three days, and we can know whether there is something that will make other EE confused or hard to understand. Then we release all the documents to the public.
At this stage a dual chip USB hashing 3.2gh under 2.5w would be the niche. Double the hashing with just adding another low cost $10 chip.
That should be possible. On the other hand - my NanoFury devices were rated for around 2GH at 2.5W and with just a minor (software) adjustment can easily do 2.4-2.6GH even though they'll use more than 2.5W in that case ... So, guess how many people are running them at the stock 2GH
But either way - a dual-chip hasher "starting" at 3GH/s @ 2.5W should be a nice add-on. And of course we will have to design the whole thing to easily go over 4GH - just because it can (and because it's almost a given that people will try to push it there anyways)
I think I already see another incarnation of the NanoFury coming ...
That sounds like a great idea
Jump to: