When players lose it's suspicious and when the casino lose it's suspicious. Oh well.
It depends where is your money
Topic: Open Discussion of Just-Dice - page 2. (Read 7673 times)
It depends where is your money
Don't forget the gamblers who took a casino for millions of dollars in Atlantic City because the casino did not use pre-shuffled decks.
In any case, I invite dooglus to come say something here, since he is the one being accused. Something like "I would never do that. blah blah blah."
Or, I think even better, he will just not respond to this as it is beneath him.
Some people value honor higher than life. Some people can not be bought. Some people have their word as their bond.
I claim to be one of those people, and I do believe dooglus is also one of those kinds of people. (okay, I am not the type of Asian who will commit suicide if I lose my honor though.)
In any case, I invite dooglus to come say something here, since he is the one being accused. Something like "I would never do that. blah blah blah."
Or, I think even better, he will just not respond to this as it is beneath him.
Some people value honor higher than life. Some people can not be bought. Some people have their word as their bond.
I claim to be one of those people, and I do believe dooglus is also one of those kinds of people. (okay, I am not the type of Asian who will commit suicide if I lose my honor though.)
I'm also glad you redacted your accusation. Maybe you should alter the title header of this thread as well?
I would like the redact my claims. It seems I let my bias get the best of me and I don't like baseless scam accusations from others on the forum, so it seems that I should hold myself to the same standard.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
Rare case of cognitive dissonance losing out to rational thought. I commend you Daggett993.
I'll acknowledge that the domain argument is not very powerful, however it is clear that my concern is not unwarranted. It is very improbable for a casino to receive 1.2M bitcoins wagered and still tread far below their expected profit.
Not improbable when one guy does single bets that high (100-500 btc a go). As I wrote in the other thread, many players had doubled/tripled or even more small bankrolls, eventually losing. Not so surprising for a guy with a 10k+ bankroll to win 8k (80%).
It's like winning 8 btc starting with 10, doing 0.1-0.5 btc single bets. Not unlikely at all, seen it hundreds of times.
Yes, not improbable at all. In fact, I once personally turned a $500 bankroll into $4000 in one weekend betting on red and black at a roulette wheel in Atlantic City; and roulette has a much higher house edge and a much lower max bet (and higher minimum bet).
I would like the redact my claims. It seems I let my bias get the best of me and I don't like baseless scam accusations from others on the forum, so it seems that I should hold myself to the same standard.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
I commend you as well for redacting your accusations. I understand it's tough to stomach a 50 BTC loss, but that doesn't justify attacking someone's character. Dooglus took some losses himself a few weeks ago when the whales took JD's bankroll into the red. You just have to realize that an investment in a gambling site with a 1% house edge and ~500 BTC max bet is going to experience a lot of variance.
I would like the redact my claims. It seems I let my bias get the best of me and I don't like baseless scam accusations from others on the forum, so it seems that I should hold myself to the same standard.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
nigle please wtf we were getting ready to release the hounds..
LOL 
I would like the redact my claims. It seems I let my bias get the best of me and I don't like baseless scam accusations from others on the forum, so it seems that I should hold myself to the same standard.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
I think it's great that you did that, most people defend being right like the holy grail or just disappear when their arguments don't hold up.
I agree as well. Accountability is often notably absent on these forums. This was big of you. Even if you can't control your bias (understandable after your losses), you can control your ego.
Thank you for setting a standard for rational discussion.
I love how every time the site makes a significant loss, people come out of the wood work and accuse dooglus of being a scammer.
Of all the idiocy I have ever seen on this site, this takes the cake.
+1
I would like the redact my claims. It seems I let my bias get the best of me and I don't like baseless scam accusations from others on the forum, so it seems that I should hold myself to the same standard.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
I think it's great that you did that, most people defend being right like the holy grail or just disappear when their arguments don't hold up.
When players lose it's suspicious and when the casino lose it's suspicious. Oh well.
I would like the redact my claims. It seems I let my bias get the best of me and I don't like baseless scam accusations from others on the forum, so it seems that I should hold myself to the same standard.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
While I still believe certain things are suspicious about the big JD losses, I would like nothing more than an open discussion of it. Thank you all and apologizes for coming off so strong.
=v\/v\/v\/v=delusions of grandeur eXpert !
-*-jmho-*-
-*-jmho-*-
Of all the idiocy I have ever seen on this site, this takes the cake.
how absurd to try and attempt to identify bad actors when you get ffked!!!=)LOL
Of all the idiocy I have ever seen on this site, this takes the cake.
ahahahha , I once said this as a joke , never thought people would actually believe in something like this 
If doog made this , he could have taken 50k+ and run at certain point (just-dice was invested 30K+ at one point) so why would he scam 1-2k ? when he could have taken 30 times more If someone steals 50k , you will never hear from that person ever again , not even fbi will find him for that amount of money ask saul goodman he can find you the guy who can dissapear you for 250k dollars
If doog made this , he could have taken 50k+ and run at certain point (just-dice was invested 30K+ at one point) so why would he scam 1-2k ? when he could have taken 30 times more If someone steals 50k , you will never hear from that person ever again , not even fbi will find him for that amount of money ask saul goodman he can find you the guy who can dissapear you for 250k dollars 
I'll acknowledge that the domain argument is not very powerful, however it is clear that my concern is not unwarranted. It is very improbable for a casino to receive 1.2M bitcoins wagered and still tread far below their expected profit.
Not improbable when one guy does single bets that high (100-500 btc a go). As I wrote in the other thread, many players had doubled/tripled or even more small bankrolls, eventually losing. Not so surprising for a guy with a 10k+ bankroll to win 8k (80%).
It's like winning 8 btc starting with 10, doing 0.1-0.5 btc single bets. Not unlikely at all, seen it hundreds of times.
Jump to: