Topic: Overpopulation of a developing country is one of its major problem (Read 595 times)

If you search for it, you will find that they even had their own coat of arms.

Where did you get Tartary is a country? Is is an obselete term for a wide region spawing Manchuria, the Gobe Desert and the Tibetan Highlands. It has always been inhabited by a variety of people. From what I get, Tartary is in a certain way associated with the Mongols, Manchurians and other Khanates, Khaganates and all that jazz, so it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to say "they're gone". That's like saying the Indian subcontinent is gone.

Talking about science, one needs to know why science was developed. Among the reasons for science are, for people to improve their living conditions by using science, and to improve their living conditions by selling their science to other people. Yet, when you think about it, all science that people develop, is based on the science of nature, the place where all science knowledge and ideas ultimately comes from.

This means that the increase of population comes from nature, not from scientific advancements of man. In fact, because of the focus of of science into small areas rather than considerations of the whole, science produces tamporary imbalances in nature which ultimately destroy populations, not help them.

Labor forces that are based on the science of man rather than on the science of nature, are ultimately going to destroy themselves. Why? Because the science that exists in nature naturally will ultimately balance the imbalances that mankind uses to develop his own science.

In other words, bringing science to a nation to develop it and its labor force of people, ultimately will destroy the nation and its people. The more the people tend to incorporate their living with natural balances rather than the unbalanced science of man, the more their populations will grow. This is part of the natural operation of nature... big populations.

Nobody can tell for a fact what will happen worldwide with a big population worldwide. Why not> It has never happened, yet... at least not in recorded history. We can only guess.

In the past there was pangea... which also was an expansion of the earth... but nobody knows why this happened. There is no reason to suggest that it will not happen again when the population of the earth gets really big... like 150 billion.

jes but third world countries are dependent on the scientific development of the centuries old imperial powers,

without the scientific skills of the western and european powers and china, and also their massive landmasses and natural ressources a tiny country like bangladesh can't develop itself, it is then simply just a zergish mass of people full of extremists and not a potential labourforce.

the leftists and billionaires in the developed world completely have forgotten that without the so called "racist right wingers and deplorables" their labour force wouldn't work

You have rightly said that if the govt has taken steps to regulate the population then it are often cured. i feel the standard of people's lives must be improved for social control. If there's adequate enforcement against rapists  social control is feasible and various health services got to be prepared for birth control then developing countries are possible.

Overpopulation is dangerous government should have policy for this , such that is maintains in normal way and every age people are equally be declining population is also bad and population whit over aged people like in china now is also bad , government should make rules so that it maintains steadily

as soon as people in a society don't have to work,

then work makes fun for quite a huge portion in the society.

in societies in which people have to work, work is often considered horrible.

Even Bangladesh, probably the country that has more population per square mile than any other, is surviving and expanding. Properly organized, the population of the country is its wealth. The more population the better.

Are there any countries of the world that don't exist any longer? Look at history. Search on "Tartary." This is a nation that existed to some extent as recent as the early 1900s. It was bigger than most nations, and covered most of Siberia and Northern Europe into Northern Canada. Why are they gone (they aren't really gone)? Because they didn't have enough population for the land they were trying to hold.

Socialism is what families are all about. When you are enjoined to the socialism of big business or a country, you are considered part of their family. The great thing is, big business and government families always allow a man or woman to get out if they want. They essentially have no choice. Think of all the people who saw the NAZI dangers in Germany before WW2, and moved out. Those who wound up in concentration camps, moved out when they died.

You are right but it will not only increase the amount of arable land but also control the population If the population is reduced then the amount of cultivable land will increase Due to the housing crisis, the amount of cultivable land is decreasing. In that case if the population is controlled the amount of cultivable land will increase.

exactly however massive industrial productivity makes it possible to do socialism in limited ways's societies then thrive because people don't have to be constantly afraid of their social security people become relaxed and easygoing, and have time to orient themselves.

however radical capitalism removes the neverending mental destruction of people abusing a nation's welfare system.

If people won't work, let them starve. That would be population reduction for those who want it.

Often minorities in America protest against government to give them MORE. Help them wak up by sending them to real 3rd world countries.

Better oranisation of life has to do with libertarian freedom - do unto others... - which is really less government.

population isn't actually the big problem, considering how big and ressourceful the world is, afrika, sahara, russia the americas are still extremely thin populated, but people from there still migrate to dense populated europe?

why?
because of better organisation of life.

overpopulation is a labour chance, the problem however is, not enough people want to be working class, everyone wants to be a banker or a capitalist.

Yes if there's enough land  people can cultivate many crops by cultivating  Because the population is increasing at the speed of food production isn't increasing. People consider the population because the biggest problem which may be a major obstacle for developing countries when the population is above required that's why we all got to increase the quantity of cultivable land.

This is all bad (about the negative points). This all happens while in many developed countries families often either have 1 child or not at all. Now it is inconspicuous, but imagine what will happen in 50 years. The population is going down a lot. Therefore it is not necessary to go to extremes. The problem is not overpopulation, but how it is organized. But I agree that on one territory there should be such a number of people who will be comfortable. There should be so much land that every person can be full when some kind of agro culture is grown on these lands

#
if european colonialism would today still exist those people would have found homes all over the world, instead of getting rasterised and imprisioned by nationalists

I agree with you but if the government takes adequate measures to prevent the population without corruption it is possible to prevent the population. Most people in our country are illiterate. Due to the lack of adequate education they have no idea about the birth control system It will not be a hindrance to the development of education by educating them.

Well, I believe the population won't be a problem anymore if they are being useful for the society by doing something meaningful using their skills and talents. The problem is there are lot of people who do nothing for the country rather wasting its resources without giving anything back to the society and to the country itself.

You are right in saying that the views of every one of our countries are different and that they don't suit the policies of the govt at present corruption may be a common incontrovertible fact that thanks to this corruption everyone in society is bereft of various privileges. Corruption is one of the foremost obstacles to being a developing country.

^^^ But all people should have more children... not only poor people. Outside of not eating the fruit, more population was the next command that God gave Adam and Eve. He also gave the command to Noah and his family after the flood.

Yipee. I can go out and have lots more kids, just to obey God. What fun!