People can't be trusted to make their own rules because it becomes anarchy and endangers everyone else.
So you will make the rules for them? That's how authoritarian governments come to power.
I once saw a guy who manages pension funds on TV and the reporter asked him why there are no voluntary pension funds but it's being collected like a tax, and he replied: because we can't trust people, they are too stupid and lazy to save money, we have to make them do it. It's for their own good.
Is that really the attitude that you support? This social protectionism? Shame...
(I know it's off-topic, but I just had to reply when I read this part)
For now we have sportsbet but it's only for Sr members and above. Sometimes there are campaigns that accept new participants but I don't update the table immediately since it's going to be full later that day.
I'd argue whether this campaign should be enlisted, due to the way it's being operated. It's free advertising for the manager who says that it's open, but doesn't add anyone to the list for a week or more, at the same time stating that if they don't post with his signature after applying, they won't be added. People post with his signatures and after some time he announces that nobody got in, but they still have a chance if they keep posting. IMO this is not how a reputable campaign should be managed.
