Topic: Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 01-Jan-23] - page 151. (Read 1034110 times)

1. Don't quote the whole post, it's unneccesary and long.
2.This list is maintained by community, its normal to accidentally skipped a campaign or two if no people reported about it
3.Again, this list is maintained by community, not mods, they're not getting paid for updating this list, it's voluntary
4.Posting an application on signature campaigns only take a few seconds, few minutes if you got slow connection. I won't exactly call that a time waster
5.You don't need to be enrolled on sig campaign to contribute to the forum
6.You are also free to update this table

That being said, I've removed InsurePal
https://paste.ee/p/YvPdb

i want this, based on youtube campaign, but i dont know where to start + joinnig

Please keep this topic about adding new signature campaigns and updating the existing ones into the list.

And I did. But in the above I was referring to this part:


It's nowhere stated whether or not applicant should put on the sig/avatar (probably not even anywhere in the middle of the thread). That's why many/most wore it just to be on the safe-side.


As above.
Plus, this wasn't direct accusation towards you, but hypothetical scenario how stalling tactic could be exploited.


That's a strange approach to communication you got there. People didn't know that, they don't read your mind. You said you will do something and you didn't.
Being clear gives everyone an option of whether they want to wait for an unknown period of time or move on. You created impression that you're in the process of reviewing applications and making announcement, which wasn't the case. A lot of people just wasted time and potential earnings they could earn elsewhere.

So no, by any means, letting all know on what's going on wouldn't be update about "nothing".

Not to mention you didn't really have to wait for Bitvest, you could announce newly accepted members and let them know they will start on the day you receive funds from Bitvest. The rejected ones could then try their luck in other campaigns.



That's what I figured when I wrote that Bitvest could be to blame. But again, people can't read your mind.


Sure. It could take even longer, say 30 days - would you also choose to keep quiet in such case, or would you make a heads-up post?

Somewhere? It's the first reply, my very first post in the whole thread. You should read as much.

5- Not require applicants to wear the signature before being enrolled, thus offsetting points 1 to 4

I was expecting an answer within the day, I didn't get one.
An update that says nothing is worthless, thus there was none.

---

As a basic rule, I dont make new enrollments as long as I don't have sufficient funds to cover payments.
Since the escrow was empty after the last payment, and I had requested an escrow refill, I delayed enrollments untill that happened.

And yes, indeed, this might take 9 days (not like the speed depends on me).
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/1BitVYCZCfQe43ButmfxprWzPtL7YSj4bT/transactions

I only blame the people who don't look back just a little in thread and work out he only accepts new people in the same post as he says 'payment sent'.


That's probably true but not a good thing if that happened to a new manager IMO.

Anyway back to the table, it's now updated showing both 777coin and Bitvest as biweekly, so I guess those unsuccessful candidates who didn't scan through the thread and work it out will be wearing the signature even longer.

I'm not accusing Lutpin of doing that deliberately (to be honest Bitvest could be more to blame, I don't know the circumstances), just pointing out that it's not OK.

If it wasn't Lutpin, but some new member trying his luck in as manager, everyone would be shitting on him mercilessly. We all know that.

Maybe that's some sort of test for applicants. You don't have to go through every post just scan through for those he has posted.


He didn't say that he said that he would only look at applications on pay round day so I deduced there was no point applying earlier in the week.


Yes, that was a bit slack. He's updated the 777coin one (still shows up in my Updated Topics).


That's not a bad idea, certainly enough people around here who would fall for it. It's really not fair to accuse Lutpin of doing that though. He's just a bit fussy about who he accepts and I think he likes people to put a bit effort into working out how the campaign runs.


PS
To anyone looking for the latest updated table, it's above https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-of-bitcointalk-signature-ad-campaigns-last-update-01-jan-23-615953

Yes, but he stated this somewhere in the thread, new applicants are not aware of that unless they decide to go through every post in the thread. Updating 1st or 2nd post wouldn't hurt.

Edit: Can you actually link me to Lutpin saying that you can set sig/avatar only after accepted? I've scan Bitvest thread before and it's not very clear at all.

Also, Lutpin's last entry in the Bitvest thread is this:


That was 9 days ago, still nothing. It takes literally seconds to write a quick update and let applicants know on what's causing the delay etc.

---

If this is tolerated, then why wouldn't someone apply this campaign model:

1- Advertised campaign, offer attractive rates. You can even use trusted escrow.
2- Never reply, don't accept/reject anyone, so you don't have to pay a single satoshi (since no one is officially accepted).
3- People will be losing patience and moving on, but new ones will surely keep coming in.
4- Congrats, you got constant stream of free advertising.

Lutpin has stated in the thread that applications are only looked at when he does payments. So anyone applying only needs to set their signature, avatar and text on that day. He is also consistent in only replying to successful applications. When I applied and was accepted into 777coin campaign a few months ago I was able to deduce that from spending 5 minutes going through the thread.

It's full now - CFNP, didn't take long.

---

As for 777coin and Bitvest, I don't think they should be in 'Active' category. They advertised themselves as open, get shitload of new applications (way more than free spots), most would set their sigs+avatars and effectively advertise them for free for weeks now, while Lutpin won't process application and won't give any update.

I understand manager could be (and likely is) very busy, but there are limits. Keeping people waiting for weeks and not giving any sort of heads-up/update is a highly unethical not to say scammy behaviour.

Move to 'Flux' or mark with asterisk?

New campaign has been published and yahoo is the campaign manager of it.

Lunyr Beta Sig and Avatar Campaign

Source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lunyr-beta-sig-and-avatar-campaignclosed-2727117

---

Is bitcloak still running? No updates from izanagi about it, I think it should be removed.

Please don't post useless information for the sake of your post for your signature campaign.
Either you didn't notice the status of graft by acccident or a complete illiterate, Graft signature campaign is in CFNP how do you expect people to join?
and the fact that you didn't get enrolled to Graft made it even worse 


Hmm, a users even claimed they got paid in last November.
Is it possible to remove this Campaign completely or some red asterisks, Fatanut?

I have found this topic where memebers of the yobit campaign confirm that payment did not happen for months:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yobit-campaign-over-2627133

When a campaign does not pay for such a long time without excuse or information, it is unlikely that they will pay ever again.

I have just joined Graft signature campaign, it gives 0.002 BTC weekly for full members. It's not too much but better than many of signature campaing which is now online. I would recommend you to join Graft.

Still a newbie, but very interested in participating as soon as I can. Thanks so much for this post!

I already mentioned that information in my first post in this page.
Just read the above posts to avoid duplicate posts 

so sorry it was a mistype of me and yeah I was talking about fastinvest signature campaign . I saw the manager of the campaign Yahoo posting that the campaign is over and participant may remove their Sig but still the campaign on the updated list

Fasteners? Never heard such name before, are you sure it is on the list? Just tried to use Control+F to find it out in this thread but I could not find a matching word with it. Do you mistype it or you are talking about other campaign which is not on the list? The only close/similar name is "fastinvest", is this what you mean?