Topic: Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 01-Jan-23] - page 183. (Read 1034110 times)
May 19, 2014, 03:00:31 PM
BitcoinliveBets is also closed op already announces he is not going to update and for last 2 months no payment for any member so please delete this also
May 19, 2014, 02:01:54 PM
CoinBet.cc is closed/scam. I'd remove it from the list as it is most likely now invalid.
Thanks. I have changed the OP. 
May 19, 2014, 01:59:36 PM
CoinBet.cc is closed/scam. I'd remove it from the list as it is most likely now invalid.
May 19, 2014, 01:25:47 PM
Because they can disappear at any moment is irrelevant and IMO makes ordering them by length even more pertinent. Longer and established operations are less likely to fall into trouble or disappear, but I still think ordering or stating how long they've been paying out is relevant and useful info. Are they listed completely random at the moment?
I copied Rannasha topic, moved GAWMiners to the "Currently active"-section, added UpDown.BT to the "Currently active"-section, moved BTC.sx to the "Closed"-section and added Cloudbet to the "Payments not yet confirmed"-section. So you could say that campaigns sorted on time. A bit, not completely.I will be doing a poll to find out what people think about sorting campaigns based on their running length.
Click here to go to the poll.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
May 19, 2014, 01:14:41 PM
Why don't you add when the deals started and/or order them by longest running? I think that'd be useful information to have. One that pays out on the first week shouldn’t be seen as trusted as all the other longer-running ones.
Because a website can disappear any minute. Yes, a website that exists might seem more legit, but in the end it can crash and burn at any given moment. That is one of the main reasons why I won't order or color them. I had that idea before as well, but Rannasha was able to convince me other wise. However, I might just add when a campaign started. I will definitely think about that. Thanks 
Because they can disappear at any moment is irrelevant and IMO makes ordering them by length even more pertinent. Longer and established operations are less likely to fall into trouble or disappear, but I still think ordering or stating how long they've been paying out is relevant and useful info. Are they listed completely random at the moment?
May 19, 2014, 12:44:33 PM
Why don't you add when the deals started and/or order them by longest running? I think that'd be useful information to have. One that pays out on the first week shouldn’t be seen as trusted as all the other longer-running ones.
Because a website can disappear any minute. Yes, a website that exists might seem more legit, but in the end it can crash and burn at any given moment. That is one of the main reasons why I won't order or color them. I had that idea before as well, but Rannasha was able to convince me other wise. However, I might just add when a campaign started. I will definitely think about that. Thanks global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
May 19, 2014, 12:35:47 PM
Why don't you add when the deals started and/or order them by longest running? I think that'd be useful information to have. One that pays out on the first week shouldn’t be seen as trusted as all the other longer-running ones.
May 19, 2014, 11:39:03 AM
Thanks for taking over the task of keeping the overview up to date!
Thank you for letting me! Good luck with your projects and everything else May 19, 2014, 11:35:49 AM
Thanks for taking over the task of keeping the overview up to date!
May 19, 2014, 10:56:21 AM
Why is UpDown still in the "Payments not yet confirmed" section, given they have paid for the first week?
Anyway, thank you for doing this Bitcoininformation; it's a really useful service.
Oh yeah, will change that right now. Thank you and no problem Anyway, thank you for doing this Bitcoininformation; it's a really useful service.
May 19, 2014, 10:49:38 AM
Why is UpDown still in the "Payments not yet confirmed" section, given they have paid for the first week?
Anyway, thank you for doing this Bitcoininformation; it's a really useful service.
Anyway, thank you for doing this Bitcoininformation; it's a really useful service.
May 19, 2014, 09:30:31 AM
Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns
The following abbreviations will be used for campaigns (where applicable):
All Bitcoin Signature Campaigns
The following abbreviations will be used for campaigns (where applicable):
| Campaigns: | ||||||
| OFNP | || | Open for new participants | ||||
| PNYC | || | Payment not yet confirmed | ||||
| FLUX | || | Campaign in flux between closed and accepting | ||||
| CFNP | || | |||||
| Term: | Ranks: | |||||
| p/d | || | post/daily | L | || | Legendary Member | |
| p/w | || | post/weekly | H | || | Hero Member | |
| p/m | || | post/monthly | S | || | Senior Member | |
| f/w | || | fixed/weekly | F | || | Full Member | |
| f/m | || | fixed/monthly | M | || | Member | |
| J | || | Junior |
All Bitcoin Signature Campaigns
| OFNP | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | Campaign
Jump to:
|