Topic: Overview of Popular Bitcoin Gambling Websites [Up-to-date as of 8th Nov '15] - page 9. (Read 13669 times)
January 18, 2015, 03:34:33 PM
Can I ask you why you have given it a A- for Reliability? Maybe expand the information part about that as well, since you only tell us about the Trustworthiness and Promotions part.
January 18, 2015, 03:30:59 PM
Update
- Added MoneyPot with an Overall rating of A-.
- Added MoneyPot with an Overall rating of A-.
January 18, 2015, 02:58:06 PM
DiamondCardz, the MoneyPot thread currently has 49 pages and I highly recommend you to check them out. Their game is different and that's why I love it.
Warning: Their game is addictive.
Warning: Their game is addictive.
Thanks for notifying me about them! I'll add them ASAP.
January 18, 2015, 02:54:30 PM
DiamondCardz, the MoneyPot thread currently has 49 pages and I highly recommend you to check them out. Their game is different and that's why I love it.
Warning: Their game is addictive.
Warning: Their game is addictive.
January 18, 2015, 12:17:44 PM
What a great effort
I don't see any other type of gambling like binary trading ( second trade or action crypto or coinut )
coin-sweeper, digit.io , money pot , and coinichiwa
Are they are not include as popular gambling site ?
I don't see any other type of gambling like binary trading ( second trade or action crypto or coinut )
coin-sweeper, digit.io , money pot , and coinichiwa
Are they are not include as popular gambling site ?
They don't have threads above 25 pages in length, or if they do, I just haven't seen them yet.
I was considering adding Coinichiwa, though.
January 18, 2015, 08:47:09 AM
Another update:
- Increased PRC's Trustworthiness to an A after a fresh review.
Melds, piss off. Even the people of PRC agree you're being an asshole.
- Increased PRC's Trustworthiness to an A after a fresh review.
Melds, piss off. Even the people of PRC agree you're being an asshole.
January 18, 2015, 08:36:26 AM
I was actually contacted by PRC. This was my reply.
I may review your trustworthiness status at a later date. B- is not the end of the world. However do try to resolve your trust with BAC rather than sitting there and letting it lie.
I disagree that you should be A+ and it seems kind of off for you to just PM me claiming you're the most trusted site operator. If you resolve that negative trust, your trustworthiness will go up.
I disagree that you should be A+ and it seems kind of off for you to just PM me claiming you're the most trusted site operator. If you resolve that negative trust, your trustworthiness will go up.
So a guy that is mod at a COMPETING site, which tried to label PRC a scam because he's a bitter child, has to work it out with Dean? Right. Maybe Dean should "buy" some worthless btctalk trust like everyone else.
January 18, 2015, 08:30:27 AM
So pocketrocketscasino, who has handled thousands of btc, done thousands in withdrawals gets B- in trust because of a bitter snail seller over his affiliates? which was canceled because he took over a domain similar to PRC and called it scam? Legit.
I was actually contacted by PRC. This was my reply.
I may review your trustworthiness status at a later date. B- is not the end of the world. However do try to resolve your trust with BAC rather than sitting there and letting it lie.
I disagree that you should be A+ and it seems kind of off for you to just PM me claiming you're the most trusted site operator. If you resolve that negative trust, your trustworthiness will go up.
I disagree that you should be A+ and it seems kind of off for you to just PM me claiming you're the most trusted site operator. If you resolve that negative trust, your trustworthiness will go up.
If efforts are at least publicly made to resolve that (or if there have been and proof can be shown to me), I'll bump the Trustworthiness up.
January 18, 2015, 08:27:22 AM
So pocketrocketscasino, who has handled thousands of btc, done thousands in withdrawals gets B- in trust because of a bitter snail seller over his affiliates? which was canceled because he took over a domain similar to PRC and called it scam? Legit.
January 18, 2015, 08:11:39 AM
OP updated. Changes:
- Added AnoniBet with an A- rating.
- Added AnoniBet with an A- rating.
January 18, 2015, 05:45:05 AM
Yeah, I originally wasn't going to include Ponzis but changed my mind. I might revise that soon once I've thought about it.
January 18, 2015, 05:36:00 AM
Loving the bias on WeeklyPonzi. Just because it's a ponzi game doesn't instantly make it untrustworthy.
-snip-
-snip-
I think this discussion is moot here. It might be a good idea for someone heavily into the ponzi game scene to make a similar list. To offer guidance. While I personally am not convinced that there is a single honest ponzi game out there and thus agree with DiamondCardz, I am probably biased as well.
Coinichiwa doesn't seem massively popular yet, but I'll check them out.
Believe me, as a PrimeDice mod (I did put this in the disclaimer) I know. But it's only one game, remember.
Believe me, as a PrimeDice mod (I did put this in the disclaimer) I know. But it's only one game, remember.
-snip-
Ponzis are not trustworthy. Simple.
Ponzis are not trustworthy. Simple.
Since you are biased and IMHO rightfully so I think its best to leave ponzis out in general. You could add a disclaimer that you are not willing to add a ponzi game/hyip or any form of gambling that works in a similar fashion. Something like the description theymos used for the proposed new section.
-snip-
Quote
Investor-based games
Games where the main factor is whether or not new "investors" join the game. Also any Bitcoin-denominated investment product with an APR of 15% or more, which are similarly risky even if they're not actually paying interest using investor deposits.
-snip-Games where the main factor is whether or not new "investors" join the game. Also any Bitcoin-denominated investment product with an APR of 15% or more, which are similarly risky even if they're not actually paying interest using investor deposits.
While I understand where you are coming from with your rating I also think that these overviews should have a higher standard of neutrality.
January 18, 2015, 05:19:08 AM
If you are going to put ref links, at least let people know they are ref links instead of hiding them in goo.gl urls...
Did I not add a Disclaimer? I must have forgot, my bad. They're not all ref links though, they're all covered in goo.gl just so I can track click statistics.
24HourPonzi.com: It's a Ponzi. Ponzis are not trustworthy. Simple.
January 18, 2015, 02:54:58 AM
If you are going to put ref links, at least let people know they are ref links instead of hiding them in goo.gl urls...
January 17, 2015, 10:39:37 PM
Loving the bias on WeeklyPonzi. Just because it's a ponzi game doesn't instantly make it untrustworthy. If you ask any of my users they will tell you that I'm an honest guy. I've had many chances to run with 100+ BTC in my wallet yet I continued to uphold the trust of the site. Yesterday I also seeded the round with 20 BTC directly from my own personal wallet. Maybe take the time to actually analyse the game before seeing "ponzi" and labelling it a scam straight up. There used to be a thing called "journalistic integrity". Not anymore I suppose.
Thanks.
Thanks.
January 17, 2015, 08:40:22 PM
amazing PD comunity is number 1..cool 
is the best site gambling PD
is the best site gambling PD
January 17, 2015, 07:59:21 PM
If you need a list with gambling sites, check my website, we have 100+ gambling sites added, so you can choose which ones you missed so far. http://bitcoinpriest.com/
This is less of a general list, and more of a list of the more major/popular Bitcoin Gambling Websites, though. However it could still be a help to me, so thanks!
January 17, 2015, 07:57:16 PM
If you need a list with gambling sites, check my website, we have 100+ gambling sites added, so you can choose which ones you missed so far. http://bitcoinpriest.com/
January 17, 2015, 07:53:20 PM
My bad, didn't see that this is bitcoin only. Sorry for the inconvenience.
January 17, 2015, 07:30:17 PM
Added CasinoBitco.in with an A rating.
amacar: Of course! How could I forget...I'll get to it ASAP.
Edit: I haven't checked JD in a while, but it would seem it is not a Bitcoin Gambling site anymore and rather gambles an altcoin. So I won't be adding it to the list, sorry.
amacar: Of course! How could I forget...I'll get to it ASAP.
Edit: I haven't checked JD in a while, but it would seem it is not a Bitcoin Gambling site anymore and rather gambles an altcoin. So I won't be adding it to the list, sorry.
Jump to: