Pages:
Author

Topic: Panic selling and postpone from trading, which one is the worse one? - page 11. (Read 1853 times)

sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 256
From the investor’s point of view, I think panic selling is the worst among two choice. Selling coins at lower price than what the investor purchase is booking in the losses. Holding has a better chance of recovering the price.
sr. member
Activity: 910
Merit: 257
Worst case is trading with emotions and joining crowd. Selling in blood bath is logical if there are good reasons for this. If there is no concrete explanation for downfall then it is better to leave on its own. Just shut down the pc and go walk. Just my usual 2 cent Smiley

The only reason for the people selling their coins is because they don't want to see if the price still go down and they don't want to get bigger losses. They thought that it's better to get a small loss than to get a bigger loss and they can accept for the lose. Besides that, they can try to buy at a low price although it doesn't guarantee for them to see the lower price in the future. But the worse case I know that if someone is selling their coins without notice that the price can get up in the next day, week, month, or even a year.

I agree. But, to answer the question, I think the worst between the two is to panic sell. That strategy leads to usually no good in the market, and I, myself, have been a victim of that bad move many times when I was starting in the market. It is sometimes very difficult to control the urge of selling, especially if you see the general view of the market, together with all the coins you are relying upon, going down. However, since these market is erratic in its movements and changes, one can expect that even if there has been a massive downfall that it will recuperate at any time, it's a cycle one has to be aware of and deal with.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 911
Have Fun )@@( Stay Safe
The only reason for the people selling their coins is because they don't want to see if the price still go down and they don't want to get bigger losses. They thought that it's better to get a small loss than to get a bigger loss and they can accept for the lose. Besides that, they can try to buy at a low price although it doesn't guarantee for them to see the lower price in the future. But the worse case I know that if someone is selling their coins without notice that the price can get up in the next day, week, month, or even a year.
The only explanation that can be given for people selling their coins at a loss is that they never invested in it for the long haul and they cannot afford to loose more if the market takes a long time to recover, i discourage people who are here to make money in a short period and usually if you are having that kind of mentality you will probably end up in a loss if the market goes down. If you are in profit and you see that there is a possibility for a correction then there is nothing wrong in selling and waiting for the market to settle down to enter again. If you go by that philosophy then you will make profit rather than taking positions all the time unless you are an expert.
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 107
I think panic selling is the worst way Because this movement puts the investor in harm and destroys his profits. In such cases, panic selling should never be done 2. way much more profitable and reliable. Just follow the market and don't take any action. When you are sure then do it.

If a person panic, he's losing the asset which could make him wealthy in the future. Selling isn't bad, but if you panic because of fear of losing financially it doesn't need to put it all at risk. That's worst because when the right time came, you'll regret that bad decision you made after being panicked
hero member
Activity: 998
Merit: 504
It's obviously panic sell that is worse because it will always bring regret at the end. In 2017, JP Morgan's announced that bitcoin is a fraud, and in less than 24 hours holders of bitcoin especially newbies who are not well knowledgeable about the technology panic sold their coin, and JP Morgan who called bitcoin a fraud/scam was the first to buy the coin at the dip making lots of profit.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 256
I'd say panic selling is the worse between the two, considering that you made some obvious rough and shitty choices which led you to such situation, whereas in postponing your trades, you obviously had done your research beforehand and you listened to your guts, even if doing the opposite may net you some profits. Playing it safe is better than playing it without any game plan, and the latter simply means you understand fully that it is quite unsafe to trade. This is money you're dealing with, and you really have to be extra careful in order to get successful in your trades and ventures.

obviously panic selling is only done when one is in panic, seeing his loses. There is no plan what so ever to recover from loses and people panic sell just to avoid more further loss. Psotposing from trade is a better idea but then i have seen people keep waiting and waiting as the coins took more than a year to recover if you buy at the all time high prices.
For me both are not good as you have mentioned there are so many bad effects of panic selling but at the same time postpone from trading, holding is surely good things because when you see majority doing wrong don’t be one of them but try to tell them what’s wrong and what is right so if you are in danger you can sell but make sure you buy when price will fall again.
hero member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 553
Filipino Translator 🇵🇭
In your opinion, which one is the worse way among the two?
Postpone from trading, because you are doing nothing. Thus, there will be no development in you and there is nothing you can blame if there are big opportunities you aren't able to take since you postpone from trading but only yourself. Unlime panic selling, you are trying to escape from further loss which is okay rather than being stacked in the dip.
full member
Activity: 487
Merit: 115
I think panic selling is the worst way Because this movement puts the investor in harm and destroys his profits. In such cases, panic selling should never be done 2. way much more profitable and reliable. Just follow the market and don't take any action. When you are sure then do it.
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 629
I cant blame those who panic sell but im not agree with their way to cut losses because if you panic sell it has an impact in the market making the situation worse. It might be beneficial to others who cant stand seeing their assets decreasing in value but as an investor its just shows that you have weak belief in cryptos.

On the other hand if you just wait and calmly monitor the market waiting for bull run you will save your coins for worthy value.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1133
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Depends on the market.
Like you said you join the panic sellers if you all knew the token will depreciate.
But if it all just be gossips then will you still go on with that kind of decision?
It is also about the trust with the token. You bought it then you should have known where it will really go and not wasting money over something which will just be dumped.
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 112
Obviously panic selling pal because the worst thing on it after selling you will become unable to retrieve the entire amount and there is no another way for it to undo .unlike postponed from trading because it seems like holding for long run wherein you have still a chance to manage your coin the way you like it or not. And you can avoid repenting also.
hero member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 877
[...]

When the price of bitcoin was $17000, many people said that the price would not fall, then the price fell and I remember that at that time I panicked and sold at  $16000 and did something very good because the price fell a lot , the price dropped to $3100... sometimes panic and sell can be very beneficial, it can save you from a big loss. Of course later I learned to control my panic and today I do not panic. But it was a good decision to have sold us $16,000

If you sold at 16,000$ resulting from panic selling, then you decision is a good one. Now you can see the price is near 4000$. If you have hold at that time, you would certainly have regretted. However there are only these few cases where panic selling gives you profit. In most of times, panic selling result in only confirmed loss.
full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 105
I'd say panic selling is the worse between the two, considering that you made some obvious rough and shitty choices which led you to such situation, whereas in postponing your trades, you obviously had done your research beforehand and you listened to your guts, even if doing the opposite may net you some profits. Playing it safe is better than playing it without any game plan, and the latter simply means you understand fully that it is quite unsafe to trade. This is money you're dealing with, and you really have to be extra careful in order to get successful in your trades and ventures.

obviously panic selling is only done when one is in panic, seeing his loses. There is no plan what so ever to recover from loses and people panic sell just to avoid more further loss. Psotposing from trade is a better idea but then i have seen people keep waiting and waiting as the coins took more than a year to recover if you buy at the all time high prices.
member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 38
I think panic and selling their investment will definitely not to be a good idea for anyone because while panic situation the decision made by us will always been not correct so my opinion is at that period of time don't take quick decision hold for sometime it will works in most of the time.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1127
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
[...]

When the price of bitcoin was $17000, many people said that the price would not fall, then the price fell and I remember that at that time I panicked and sold at  $16000 and did something very good because the price fell a lot , the price dropped to $3100... sometimes panic and sell can be very beneficial, it can save you from a big loss. Of course later I learned to control my panic and today I do not panic. But it was a good decision to have sold us $16,000
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 629
I think that panic sales cause much more serious and more negative results, because many large traders who are manipulating the market usually benefit from the panic situation of small investors. The deferments made during trade transactions cause serious damage from time to time but do not cause serious damage in general. If panic is commented, all buying and whole sales in panic cause loss of individuals.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
I'd say panic selling is the worse between the two, considering that you made some obvious rough and shitty choices which led you to such situation, whereas in postponing your trades, you obviously had done your research beforehand and you listened to your guts, even if doing the opposite may net you some profits. Playing it safe is better than playing it without any game plan, and the latter simply means you understand fully that it is quite unsafe to trade. This is money you're dealing with, and you really have to be extra careful in order to get successful in your trades and ventures.
full member
Activity: 1736
Merit: 121
Among the two, I don't advocate for panic selling. Panic selling means you are either unlucky to sell when price has deeped for long before you decide to sell. But, hodling is better. With hodling, you still have the chance to take profit or get back to your entering price. No room for panic selling.
full member
Activity: 1258
Merit: 104
Surely the seller is panicking because the often panicked traders don't have trust in the market, because what makes a lot of people's losses is panic when the market decreases
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 529
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
The dynamic situation of cryptocurrency these days in general responded by three ways: selling panicly with the risk of cut-loss in order to save the remaining assets from more fallen, hold the assets and playing save by not doing any trading activities, and view the phenomenon as a diamond chance then buying coins in huge amounts of investments while the prices are low. Of course, those three ways are logically humane and each has their own pluses and minuses.

I am intrigued upon the first two: panic selling and postponing from trading.

On doing panic selling, ones tend to sell their assets in the price lower than in the actual price. The main goal is to sell their coins faster to save themselves from the worse situation, without consideration upon the impact of their behaviour towards the market in general.

Meanwhile, ones could also hold their assests and postpone from doing any trading activities, in order to keep their assets safe and even maybe went on hiatus from digital assets bussiness while waiting for the bullish days to be back. They don't want to sell their assets in low price, but the act of not doing any trading is logically also has impact in general. At least, it is contributing on slower the trading traffic.

In your opinion, which one is the worse way among the two?

Well another thing to consider. Those that sell in panic probably can't afford to hold out a certain downward trend hence the need to save and cut losses. Those that actually have time and money to spare falls in the latter category you stated. They can hold their coins for a while without any financial repercussions so why sell at a loss when you can wait for the market to recover. I prefer that method of course.
Pages:
Jump to: