Got mine and Canary was extremely helpful with the shipping (cause I'm such a dam n00b) and delivery.
Thanks! Will be sure to watch for stuff from you again.
ig
Topic: [PAUSED] batch #40 .053 per AntMiner U1 USB 1.6Gh/s+ up to 2.2 - page 3. (Read 11251 times)
January 14, 2014, 03:49:28 PM
January 13, 2014, 11:36:39 PM
Just placed another order. Email sent. Thanks Canary!
You're welcome! 
January 13, 2014, 10:31:14 PM
Just placed another order. Email sent. Thanks Canary!
January 11, 2014, 05:56:36 PM
I have ordered 6 U1's from Canary.
Each has shipped within 24 hours, most within 12 hours and one within a few.
Canary is very responsive by email.
It is also very professional that Canary uses the signing of the tracking number to avoid fraud.
I appreciate it!
Each has shipped within 24 hours, most within 12 hours and one within a few.
Canary is very responsive by email.
It is also very professional that Canary uses the signing of the tracking number to avoid fraud.
I appreciate it!
got my 3 yesterday, was a drop in replacement for my old sticks, with the new bfgminer. Running at 2.0 per stick with out any issues.
Great job Canary I will buy from you again..
Great job Canary I will buy from you again..
You're welcome!!!
orders shipped out earlier today. next shipping is Monday AM.
January 11, 2014, 02:32:06 PM
got my 3 yesterday, was a drop in replacement for my old sticks, with the new bfgminer. Running at 2.0 per stick with out any issues.
Great job Canary I will buy from you again..
Great job Canary I will buy from you again..
January 11, 2014, 11:35:01 AM
I have ordered 6 U1's from Canary.
Each has shipped within 24 hours, most within 12 hours and one within a few.
Canary is very responsive by email.
It is also very professional that Canary uses the signing of the tracking number to avoid fraud.
I appreciate it!
Each has shipped within 24 hours, most within 12 hours and one within a few.
Canary is very responsive by email.
It is also very professional that Canary uses the signing of the tracking number to avoid fraud.
I appreciate it!
January 11, 2014, 08:48:29 AM
Does anybody know the actual wattage of each Ant at the USB port (or at the wall) at the following hash rates?
1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
chip data sheet has some info onpg. 3: https://github.com/AntMiner/AntGen1/blob/master/datasheet/BM1380_Datasheet.pdf1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
but someone probably has the values, philipma1957
?I am philipma1957's other id on this site. this pc is setup with this account as a backup.
37 sticks at 2 gh on a 49 port hub pull 112-115 watts using a seasonic 750 plat power supply so the worst case is 3.11 watts a stick.
it is lower then that as I have 2 thermal take fans plugged in and that number is at the plug not at the stick. give me a minute I will turn off the 2 fans, and measure again. with the fans off 37 sticks at 2 gh giving me 68.7 gh pull 112 watts.
this means 112 /37 = 3.02 watts a stick at the plug in the k watt meter. the draw on the port is less since the most efficient that plat power supply is 90 percent so 3.02 x .90 = 2.72 watts at the port maybe more like 2.57 watts since the psu may be 85% efficient with the 5 volt only load.
so 2.5- 2.7 at the usb port and 3.1 at the plug in the wall for 1 stick at 2 gh clock.
I will do more at 1.8 1.6 and 1.4 over the weekend. for now these sticks are fine to over clock .
since they turn a profit at 20 cents a k-watt until difficulty reaches 40,000 mill. but down the road when diff is 40,000 mill maybe running them at 1.4gh would really drop power use a lot.
Thanks for the info, guys.
It seems an Ant OC'd to 2.0 GH/s theoretically maxes out a USB 2.0 port (.5A = 2.5W); 2.2 GH/s would be pushing it then.
When I benchmarked the USB BEs last year, I came up with a 3WAC draw (at the wall) at around 85% efficiency. Therefore, in perspective, a USB BE and a 2 GH/s Ant have similar power draw but the latter hashes about six times more. Not bad at all.
So, when are they gonna slap these Ant chips on to the mini blades in a Cube. That would result in geek orgasm. That's almost 200 GH/s in a Cube package.
first off 2.2 ran like shit.
2.0 was very stable seems to be the sweet spot
I just setup 1.8 and looks like the watts dropped from 112 to 110 give me time to double check it. saving 2 watts and losing gh is not worth it.
I ran 68.7gh at 112 watts for 1 week in a row. 37 sticks at 2gh with a zombie that would come and go.
I will post on same 37 sticks and 1.8gh it has been running for 25 minutes
After 1.5 hours 37 sticks at 1.8 = 62 gh and 109 watts
I will run for a day but as of now 2.0 setting is better then 1.8 setting
68 gh/ 112 watts vs 62 gh/109 watts
_______________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________
the ant chips are in a cube like device.
the s-1 is a lot like a cube.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/AntMiner-S1-Dual-Blades-180-GH-ASIC-Bitcoin-Miner-IN-HAND-SHIP-NOW-Hot-Sale-New-/151202783114?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2334635f8a
I would like a 10 chip device at a good price that runs off usb.
16gh to 20gh hashrate 240 to 300 dollar price range.
you can add up to 20 per pc. This allows the little guy to grow hash power and be a repeat customer. Adding a cube at 600 bucks is a big buy adding an s-1 at 4000 is a huge buy. adding a 20gh unit for 240-300 many smaller miners will do it once a month.
January 11, 2014, 07:52:34 AM
Does anybody know the actual wattage of each Ant at the USB port (or at the wall) at the following hash rates?
1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
chip data sheet has some info onpg. 3: https://github.com/AntMiner/AntGen1/blob/master/datasheet/BM1380_Datasheet.pdf1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
but someone probably has the values, philipma1957
?I am philipma1957's other id on this site. this pc is setup with this account as a backup.
37 sticks at 2 gh on a 49 port hub pull 112-115 watts using a seasonic 750 plat power supply so the worst case is 3.11 watts a stick.
it is lower then that as I have 2 thermal take fans plugged in and that number is at the plug not at the stick. give me a minute I will turn off the 2 fans, and measure again. with the fans off 37 sticks at 2 gh giving me 68.7 gh pull 112 watts.
this means 112 /37 = 3.02 watts a stick at the plug in the k watt meter. the draw on the port is less since the most efficient that plat power supply is 90 percent so 3.02 x .90 = 2.72 watts at the port maybe more like 2.57 watts since the psu may be 85% efficient with the 5 volt only load.
so 2.5- 2.7 at the usb port and 3.1 at the plug in the wall for 1 stick at 2 gh clock.
I will do more at 1.8 1.6 and 1.4 over the weekend. for now these sticks are fine to over clock .
since they turn a profit at 20 cents a k-watt until difficulty reaches 40,000 mill. but down the road when diff is 40,000 mill maybe running them at 1.4gh would really drop power use a lot.
Thanks for the info, guys.
It seems an Ant OC'd to 2.0 GH/s theoretically maxes out a USB 2.0 port (.5A = 2.5W); 2.2 GH/s would be pushing it then.
When I benchmarked the USB BEs last year, I came up with a 3WAC draw (at the wall) at around 85% efficiency. Therefore, in perspective, a USB BE and a 2 GH/s Ant have similar power draw but the latter hashes about six times more. Not bad at all.
So, when are they gonna slap these Ant chips on to the mini blades in a Cube. That would result in geek orgasm. That's almost 200 GH/s in a Cube package.
January 11, 2014, 12:09:54 AM
back on my other pc. judypug1956 is me. I have a few backup ids.
I will do a 37 stick setup and use 0881 instead of 0981 couri
I will do a 37 stick setup and use 0881 instead of 0981 couri
January 10, 2014, 11:12:24 PM
Does anybody know the actual wattage of each Ant at the USB port (or at the wall) at the following hash rates?
1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
chip data sheet has some info onpg. 3: https://github.com/AntMiner/AntGen1/blob/master/datasheet/BM1380_Datasheet.pdf1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
but someone probably has the values, philipma1957
?I am philipma1957's other id on this site. this pc is setup with this account as a backup.
37 sticks at 2 gh on a 49 port hub pull 112-115 watts using a seasonic 750 plat power supply so the worst case is 3.11 watts a stick.
it is lower then that as I have 2 thermal take fans plugged in and that number is at the plug not at the stick. give me a minute I will turn off the 2 fans, and measure again. with the fans off 37 sticks at 2 gh giving me 68.7 gh pull 112 watts.
this means 112 /37 = 3.02 watts a stick at the plug in the k watt meter. the draw on the port is less since the most efficient that plat power supply is 90 percent so 3.02 x .90 = 2.72 watts at the port maybe more like 2.57 watts since the psu may be 85% efficient with the 5 volt only load.
so 2.5- 2.7 at the usb port and 3.1 at the plug in the wall for 1 stick at 2 gh clock.
I will do more at 1.8 1.6 and 1.4 over the weekend. for now these sticks are fine to over clock .
since they turn a profit at 20 cents a k-watt until difficulty reaches 40,000 mill. but down the road when diff is 40,000 mill maybe running them at 1.4gh would really drop power use a lot.
January 10, 2014, 10:53:01 PM
Does anybody know the actual wattage of each Ant at the USB port (or at the wall) at the following hash rates?
1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
chip data sheet has some info onpg. 3: https://github.com/AntMiner/AntGen1/blob/master/datasheet/BM1380_Datasheet.pdf1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
but someone probably has the values, philipma1957
? January 10, 2014, 07:37:29 PM
Does anybody know the actual wattage of each Ant at the USB port (or at the wall) at the following hash rates?
1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
1. default @ 1.6 GH/s
2. OC'd to 1.8 GH/s
3. OC'd to 2.0 GH/s
4. OC'd to 2.2 GH/s
January 10, 2014, 07:28:55 PM
Just ordered a few up, as always thanks Canary for providing a great service!
shipped out earlier today. enjoy!! January 10, 2014, 02:36:17 PM
Just ordered a few up, as always thanks Canary for providing a great service!
January 10, 2014, 01:46:57 PM
So p**d at the Post Office right now...delivery scheduled for TOMORROW at my job where I sent them! Good ol uncle Sam just cost me 72hrs of hashing...lol
you might be able to pick it up tomorrow. can you stop at your post office today with the tracking number and ask for post master. ask him to see about holding it for you to pickup instead... January 10, 2014, 01:44:54 PM
So p**d at the Post Office right now...delivery scheduled for TOMORROW at my job where I sent them! Good ol uncle Sam just cost me 72hrs of hashing...lol
January 09, 2014, 07:19:51 PM
bfgminer support has been added and is available to test : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4404188
you can mix ASICMiner Erupter USB miners and AntMiner's U1s.
you can mix ASICMiner Erupter USB miners and AntMiner's U1s.
Will that also apply to Minepeon also? It uses BFGminer under the hood, but I think it's an old version...
I am thinking of getting a dozen usb 2.0 4gb size sticks and coping my working ant miner folder to them. it would allow 3 start.bat files in cgminer one at 1.6 gh then 1.8 gh and lastly 1 at 2.0gh I have to decide how practical this idea is. I am building a new windows 7 pc from the beginning this weekend. I will use a test usb stick to see how easy it makes setup. I can't push how big of an improvement these are over the old AM sticks. 2.0 vs .333 and about 15% less power for each stick.
these sticks will run at a diff of 30,000 mill or 20x the current diff and still earn more then the power they use if you are under 20 cents a k watt and if BTC is 800 usd or more.
http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/calculator
I have a 49 port hub with 37 sticks giving me 69 gh at 112 watts . while they won't earn a lot they are still in the black power wise at a diff of 42000 mill according to the calc above
January 09, 2014, 05:12:55 PM
bfgminer support has been added and is available to test : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4404188
you can mix ASICMiner Erupter USB miners and AntMiner's U1s.
you can mix ASICMiner Erupter USB miners and AntMiner's U1s.
Will that also apply to Minepeon also? It uses BFGminer under the hood, but I think it's an old version...
January 09, 2014, 04:53:23 PM
bfgminer support has been added and is available to test : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4404188
you can mix ASICMiner Erupter USB miners and AntMiner's U1s.
you can mix ASICMiner Erupter USB miners and AntMiner's U1s.
Will that also apply to Minepeon also? It uses BFGminer under the hood, but I think it's an old version...
January 09, 2014, 04:22:26 PM
bfgminer support has been added and is available to test : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4404188
you can mix ASICMiner Erupter USB miners and AntMiner's U1s.
you can mix ASICMiner Erupter USB miners and AntMiner's U1s.
Jump to: