Pages:
Author

Topic: Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, is it the end to the deadly corona virus? - page 2. (Read 685 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, is it the end to the deadly corona virus?

No. It's the end of a lot of lives of the elderly... a kinda switched-in euthanasia.


REPORT: Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine killed 40 times more old people than the virus itself...



A re-analysis of data provided by the Israeli Health Ministry concluded that Pfizer and BioNTech's messenger RNA (mRNA) gene therapy injections have already killed "about 40 times more (elderly) people than the disease itself would have killed" during a recent five-week vaccination period.

Piggybacking on research from back in January which found that Chinese virus vaccines are "not safer" than the virus itself, this latest study indicts the Trump vaccines for causing more death rather than preventing it.

Dr. Hervé Seligmann, a faculty member at Aix-Marseille University in France demonstrated using a full mathematical analysis that among "those vaccinated and above 65, 0.2% … died during the three-week period between doses, hence about 200 among 100,000 vaccinated."

"This is to be compared to the 4.91 dead among 100,000 dying from COVID-19 without vaccination," he added.


Cool
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 566
Population reduction. I don't understand why countries want their military to get the experimental vaccine. They need their soldiers to fight. Of course, with the elderly it doesn't matter at all, right? Those people are almost gone anyway, right? Who cares if the vaccine makers are going to be elderly sometime, right?
You make a good point about the use of the military for the experimental vaccine cause they are making alot of sacrifices for the country but the use of the elderly people for the experimental vaccine is not good either and it does matter alot even if they are going to die soon.
Having said that, the experiment should be performed on a volunteer.

Elderlies are actually volunteers who signs a written consent before they get vaccinated.
I am aware of that but I only disagreed with @BADecker statement about the elders being used as an experiment for the covid-19 vaccine without their permission. We'll all grow old someday and we will be treated the same way we treat the elders of today.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
Cheap and viable treatment options
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56403712

If active duty members drop dead on the spot, what hope have elderly already weak person have?
Beside what will be long term effects, nobody can answer now. MEDICAL SHOCKER

Injured by a Vaccine? Here’s How to Report It
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/injured-by-vaccine-how-to-report-it/
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
Population reduction. I don't understand why countries want their military to get the experimental vaccine. They need their soldiers to fight. Of course, with the elderly it doesn't matter at all, right? Those people are almost gone anyway, right? Who cares if the vaccine makers are going to be elderly sometime, right?

So badecker, I think we found the flaw in your logic.

If the COVID vaccine damages the health and natural immunity of any individual who has the misfortune of being jabbed, and that the government is pushing vaccines as a tactic of population control, then it would make no sense for the vaccine to be distributed amongst the armed forces. If you have a weak military, you have a weak country.


So which is it? The vaccine is safe and actually serves a purpose? Or, the government is acting against their self interest and are weakening their own military? Which seems more plausible, because the government acting against their own self interest seems the least plausible.

Armed forces for the last 100 years or so been canon fodder lots of time, just take Normandy. France coast line is long, lots of beaches with zero defense, but no lets go in some small stretch of land with crazy amount of heavy fortified bunkers. Nothing but sacrificial lamb.
Most people would have preferred  to stayed in bed with wife and not freeze in some wet, cold dirt hole in country far away. It was the law to fight the “enemy”, same it is the law in lots of places to wear a mask because the evil “enemy” ….Once able men are gone/out of the way with rest of population you do as please.
There is no “vaccine” for covid only a treatment.

Then what is the viable treatment option? A vaccine is "preventative treatment". Yes, some of the armed forces can be viewed as sacrificial lamb to wealthy establishment politicians, but it still doesn't make sense to vaccinate the entirety of the armed forces with an ineffective vaccine when you depend on them to serve your interest. You expend your entire military, then who exists to defend the nation? No one.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
Population reduction. I don't understand why countries want their military to get the experimental vaccine. They need their soldiers to fight. Of course, with the elderly it doesn't matter at all, right? Those people are almost gone anyway, right? Who cares if the vaccine makers are going to be elderly sometime, right?

So badecker, I think we found the flaw in your logic.

If the COVID vaccine damages the health and natural immunity of any individual who has the misfortune of being jabbed, and that the government is pushing vaccines as a tactic of population control, then it would make no sense for the vaccine to be distributed amongst the armed forces. If you have a weak military, you have a weak country.


So which is it? The vaccine is safe and actually serves a purpose? Or, the government is acting against their self interest and are weakening their own military? Which seems more plausible, because the government acting against their own self interest seems the least plausible.

Armed forces for the last 100 years or so been canon fodder lots of time, just take Normandy. France coast line is long, lots of beaches with zero defense, but no lets go in some small stretch of land with crazy amount of heavy fortified bunkers. Nothing but sacrificial lamb.
Most people would have preferred  to stayed in bed with wife and not freeze in some wet, cold dirt hole in country far away. It was the law to fight the “enemy”, same it is the law in lots of places to wear a mask because the evil “enemy” ….Once able men are gone/out of the way with rest of population you do as please.
There is no “vaccine” for covid only a treatment.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 158
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Population reduction. I don't understand why countries want their military to get the experimental vaccine. They need their soldiers to fight. Of course, with the elderly it doesn't matter at all, right? Those people are almost gone anyway, right? Who cares if the vaccine makers are going to be elderly sometime, right?
You make a good point about the use of the military for the experimental vaccine cause they are making alot of sacrifices for the country but the use of the elderly people for the experimental vaccine is not good either and it does matter alot even if they are going to die soon.
Having said that, the experiment should be performed on a volunteer.

Elderlies are actually volunteers who signs a written consent before they get vaccinated.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
Population reduction. I don't understand why countries want their military to get the experimental vaccine. They need their soldiers to fight. Of course, with the elderly it doesn't matter at all, right? Those people are almost gone anyway, right? Who cares if the vaccine makers are going to be elderly sometime, right?

So badecker, I think we found the flaw in your logic.

If the COVID vaccine damages the health and natural immunity of any individual who has the misfortune of being jabbed, and that the government is pushing vaccines as a tactic of population control, then it would make no sense for the vaccine to be distributed amongst the armed forces. If you have a weak military, you have a weak country.


So which is it? The vaccine is safe and actually serves a purpose? Or, the government is acting against their self interest and are weakening their own military? Which seems more plausible, because the government acting against their own self interest seems the least plausible.
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 566
Population reduction. I don't understand why countries want their military to get the experimental vaccine. They need their soldiers to fight. Of course, with the elderly it doesn't matter at all, right? Those people are almost gone anyway, right? Who cares if the vaccine makers are going to be elderly sometime, right?
You make a good point about the use of the military for the experimental vaccine cause they are making alot of sacrifices for the country but the use of the elderly people for the experimental vaccine is not good either and it does matter alot even if they are going to die soon.
Having said that, the experiment should be performed on a volunteer.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Population reduction. I don't understand why countries want their military to get the experimental vaccine. They need their soldiers to fight. Of course, with the elderly it doesn't matter at all, right? Those people are almost gone anyway, right? Who cares if the vaccine makers are going to be elderly sometime, right?


Experimental Vaccine Death Rate for Israel's Elderly 40 Times Higher Than COVID-19 Deaths:



While in January a group of independent doctors concluded that experimental COVID-19 vaccines are "not safer" than the virus itself, a new analysis of vaccine-related death rates in Israel demonstrates that this may indeed be the case to dramatic levels.

A re-analysis of published data from the Israeli Health Ministry by Dr. Hervé Seligmann, a member of the faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases at Aix-Marseille University, and engineer Haim Yativ reveal, in short, that the mRNA experimental vaccine from Pfizer killed "about 40 times more (elderly) people than the disease itself would have killed" during a recent five-week vaccination period. Among the younger class, these numbers are compounded to death rates at 260 times what the COVID-19 virus would have claimed in the given time frame.

While the full mathematical analysis may be found in the article itself, the authors demonstrate how among "those vaccinated and above 65, 0.2 percent … died during the three-week period between doses, hence about 200 among 100,000 vaccinated. This is to be compared to the 4.91 dead among 100,000 dying from COVID-19 without vaccination."

"This scary picture also extends to those below 65," the researchers continued. During the five-week vaccination process "0.05 percent, meaning 50 among 100,000, died. This is to be compared to the 0.19 per 100,000 dying from COVID-19 (who) are not vaccinated … Hence the death rate of this age group increased by 260 (times) during this five-week period of the vaccination process, as compared to their natural COVID-19 death rate."

As reported by IsraelNationalNews (INN), Seligmann is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality, has a biology degree from Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written more than 100 scientific publications. INN reports the researchers "have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel."


Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
Vaccines it the "real" start of the virus, as bill gates has promised it will get real attention.
https://www.planet-today.com/2021/03/dozens-of-italian-teachers-fall-ill.html#gsc.tab=0
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, is it the end to the deadly corona virus?


No. It's the start of continued dependence on more and more vaccines in the future.


Cool

I believe this is the key. With vaccinations every 6 months for COVID and diseases that arise, constant profits are assured everywhere for pharmaceuticals, for low risk diseases. As if it wasn't enough how many people there already are with chronic medications that can be avoided with natural remedies.
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283

Don't know if these vaccines could really cure the covid or protect us with this virus. Remember covid-19 was not a natural disease so you cannot be sure of the motive behind these vaccines too.


The so-called 'vaccines' for so-called 'covid' are designed to, in part, create pools of asymptomatic carriers who can give safe harbor to the virus (and other non-lethal biological weapons of the same class) and help it spread.  In this way it they are similar to the pertussis vaccine.

newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1172
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
They haven't tested it against natural immunity. That is 100%  effective with no side effects.

One of the most effective ways for a vaccine to cure us from Covid, is to use it to kill off all the people. No people, nobody will have to worry about Covid any longer, right? We can see from what is happening to people who take/get the vaccine, that this is what is starting to happen.

Cool

Don't know if these vaccines could really cure the covid or protect us with this virus. Remember covid-19 was not a natural disease so you cannot be sure of the motive behind these vaccines too.

With the virus, you die in 14 days while with these vaccine what the number of days you will be able to live  Huh
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, is it the end to the deadly corona virus?


No. It's the start of continued dependence on more and more vaccines in the future.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283

If Pfizer is successfully sued for NEGLIGENCE then _Pfizer_ gets the nations military bases of and central bank assets from the country to pay for their losses.

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/1QGYb5SN2gcK/

I could tell that there was fishy shit going on with Pfizer running around getting confidentiality agreements before negotiaions for supply of their experimental gene therapies, but even I didn't imagine this level of insult.

Now we know what Gates was smirking about in this one from back in May:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/Jh7T0SmEhUsQ/

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1285
Flying Hellfish is a Commie
Unfortunately, no. As we all can see there is new version of covid spreading more and faster than the old one. Sometimes I feel like vaccine producers are just rubbing their hands and giving us more and more vaccines for diseases that are not natural.

There are so many different mutations out there already, in Brazil, UK, South Africa. It will be hard for the vaccines to cover all the possible mutations from the start. My bet is that we will see new vaccines coming out at the end of this year, so that there will a need for everybody to get another vaccine. Also we still don't know the long term immunity of the vaccines yet. It could be the case that the vaccines will be recurring event every year.

Some of the vaccines that are already out help against these mutations, not the same degree that they would the normal strain though it is good enough to not be scared. We shouldn’t write off these vaccines even if there are mutations out there. Worst case you’d require a booster vaccine sometime in the future.

Here’s a quote from CNBC about the mutations and vaccines:

Evidence so far suggests that the two Covid-19 vaccines authorized in the U.S., from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech, appear to offer good protection against new variants.
hero member
Activity: 1974
Merit: 534
Unfortunately, no. As we all can see there is new version of covid spreading more and faster than the old one. Sometimes I feel like vaccine producers are just rubbing their hands and giving us more and more vaccines for diseases that are not natural.

There are so many different mutations out there already, in Brazil, UK, South Africa. It will be hard for the vaccines to cover all the possible mutations from the start. My bet is that we will see new vaccines coming out at the end of this year, so that there will a need for everybody to get another vaccine. Also we still don't know the long term immunity of the vaccines yet. It could be the case that the vaccines will be recurring event every year.
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 102
Unfortunately, no. As we all can see there is new version of covid spreading more and faster than the old one. Sometimes I feel like vaccine producers are just rubbing their hands and giving us more and more vaccines for diseases that are not natural.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine, is it the end to the deadly corona virus?


Of course not. The medical and government leaders will keep on saying there is a deadly virus, as long as they can make more money off the people. Try vitamin D, or vitamin C + zinc.


Cool
Pages:
Jump to: