Where this much money is involved in this type of industry and software, it would be irresponsible for the developers
to identify themselves and put themselves and their family in uncertain danger.
I agree. It is undesirable to risk winding up on this list:
https://github.com/jlopp/physical-bitcoin-attacksThe maintainer of that list is not anonymous; his name is Jameson Lopp. However,
he took extraordinary measures to “vanish” after he himself suffered a real-world physical attack.
You can't control stupidity. I also don't feel sorry for any person who is incapable of following plain and simple
security instructions.
Security instructions:
Use PGP for code signing. Generating a PGP key does not require identifying oneself, just as with generating a Bitcoin key.
The only plausible reasons
not to sign code this way are either ignorance, technical ineptitude, or a desire potentially to repudiate the code. Just do it!
The only people who have had a problem with the PhoenixMiner are the idiots that downloaded a hacked version
from an unauthorized link on a forum page that the developers have said NEVER do.
If that is true, past performance is no guarantee of future results. What if Github gets hacked? What if a Github employee acts maliciously, or an Amazon employee with access to Github’s AWS download backend, or...?
Every serious crypto project uses PGP signatures to verify downloads. Bitcoin Core does not rely on Github’s security, or the security of any download server; they have a highly sophisticated process for making sure you can verify that what you download is
exactly what the developers are trying to give you, and it is all ultimately anchored in PGP signatures. See
what I said above about Monero—oh, and I think you can be sure that the Monero people
love anonymity! Examples abound...
Mining takes a certain amount of knowledge, faith, trust and risk.
By design, mining is supposed to be
trustless.
If anyone has reservations about the honesty or the safety of the code they are running they should simply format their hard
drives and open a bank savings account. And that is also not 100% safe and secure.
LOL, bank account. I do not trust that. I trust my Bitcoin wallet (and my underlying OS) much more. Of course, I
have verified the origin of
every bit of code on my system using digital signatures—no exceptions! There is no excuse to do otherwise! (I have also audited not-insignificant portions of the source code myself; but that is obviously no way to exclude all vectors for malicious code.)
What if Masons rule everything?
