----------------------------------
Information for Bitcointalk community to sum up this thread - because we would like to be as much transparent as possible:
When we have justified suspicions that any user's activities may constitute a violation of regulations or even a crime, the case is analyzed by us more precisely. If the doubts cannot be explained to the benefit of the user, in accordance with our terms of use (and above all - The European Union’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive) the specific account has to be blocked and the case is always referred to the competent law enforcement authorities. We wait for authorities' decision on what can be done with the funds.
Moreover, as any other platform that is obliged to follow indications in The European Union’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive we ask BitBay Users to submit only authentic documents during the KYC procedure.
Unfortunately, such threads may influence your opinion on the entire service, however, there are many Users that fully understand that compliance with the law is crucial for cryptocurrency exchanges to be safe for Users and necessary for cryptocurrency business area to develop.
We believe that it would be best to see for yourself if after the acceptance of legit KYC procedure any problems with funds withdrawal happen. Therefore we ask also for your understanding.
The first question is why have Bitbay verified this account if the ID was not authentic? OP shouldn't be verified in the first place.
Tell me please how is it possible that only after deposit Bitbay found out that documents are not good or even not authentic.
This case should be ended on verification if there was any sign of counterfeit documents.
One more time, why you let this person believe that everything is good and let him deposit if there was a problem with documents?
I understand fully this member and my negative trust stays until this case will be resolved or proper explanation provided.