IMO if you're going to revive, it needs to be done sooner rather than later. I agree that it shouldn't be hastily thrown together, but to drag it on would not reap success.
John,
Earlier I was against with an idea of doing a reversed split by 8 , so the 32 billion panda then becomes only 4 billion total; but I think this is best idea Not only Panda, but I have witnessed other crypto coins doing that as well, to gain interest of more people; however I am not sure about staking percentage, whether it should be kept same 2.5% or should be raised to 8% as you said lets wait and discuss with the community.
I second the idea.
Pnd Holders,
What's your call?
Hello jaipagre, Nice to hear from you on this topic
I personally think we should not change anything regarding our supply or our low inflation of less than 2 1/2% but it is always good to keep up the brainstorming. I also think the coin supply is much lower in reality to what is showing on Pandacoin's blockchain since our Pandacoin has been through much since our initial launch. Even though we project new Pandacoins being created at 1 1/2% annually that is only if all the Pandacoins were being stake mined in actuality growth is happening much slower overall.
In the interest of discussion, what about a coin swap or trade / reverse split where every Pandacoin owner needs to use a website within some timeframe to perform a transformation we could also eliminate all lost forever Pandacoin?
