I want to make a statement for the record to address both the individuals who wish to provide negativity within this forum and to those who are naysaying those who are providing said negativity.
If there is a constructive piece of criticism you have--something perhaps that you think Pandacoin is not doing quite correctly, or something that we ought to be doing that we aren't-- please provide it, and support your statement as well as you can with logic and reason, and we will all engage in a reasoned and intelligent discussion with you. In fact, we may even come to the decision that you are correct, and adopt some of your ideas.
However, if your intention is to merely provide something along the lines of "This coin will fail" or "Enjoy the dump" without any kind of discussion or constructive criticism, there's absolutely nothing to be said to you, for you provide nothing substantive, and merely exist here to harm the individuals in this community.
Tl;DR: If you have criticism, provide it with argumentation and logic. If you don't, you won't get a kind reception if you merely FUD.
I have some constructive criticism for you:
- you emited all the coins in advance and then confuse people by saying they can mine the coin (with a browser - ha ha ha)
- you have almost nothing new to offer that hasn't been here before
- you think that visually attractive website will save lack of real improvements
anyway, this coin will die alongside with Dogecoin and pretty much all the altcoins that didn't bring any innovations.
So imagine you spend a day conducting a survey towards the average Joe's and Larry's out there, and asking them to name all the decentralized digital currencies that they know of. How many of them would you think could name more than just Bitcoin and/or perhaps Dogecoin? Most would react to the question with "decentralized-wha?".
The market segment that I've highlighted in my above example would have no clue about any of the 1000's of clone coins. PND is aimed at appealing to those that are outside of early crypto adopters like yourself, myself and the typical crowd that frequents this forum.
^ This. Most people forget about this and get trapped into the mentality of trying to find coins that appeals to early adopters like us.
^ So I was trying to explain to my work colleagues on what I've been so engrossed about lately (Hint: It's PND). Once I got to the topic of buying and mining, and trying to explain to them the current processes of doing it, you can pretty much see their attention die off. They just didn't get it, and kept asking if there's a simpler way to get "free pandacoins with your computer" or "can't I just use my credit card to buy some?"
VeeMiner here doesn't get the the PND Dev's vision, and that's fine. The PND Devs had clearly stated multiple times that they are not trying to appeal to early adopters that run rampard in this forum. Read the above quote, and try to imagine what your so called innovations will impact on the normal technophobe peeps and see if they care.
And just to be clear, and I feel the need to correct you here - from the looks of the things, PND is getting INNOVATIONS THAT MATTER because crypto will never succeed unless it breaks out and is adopted by the majority-
- World's first main wallet that has an internet banking interface AND functionality so normal technophobe peeps can feel familiar with crypto.
- Packaging and design of a coin that is targeted at the normal technophobe peeps, an all-in-one package coin that is easy to use, easy to obtain and easy to understand, positioned to have a GLOBAL MASS APPEAL.
This is innovation that matters. Whilst every other coin is focusing on creating technologies that the normal technophobe peeps don't give a sh*t about, PND is focusing on the important things first - enabling anyone to get into crypto.
These guys are smart, and they are doing it correctly by defining what a crypto SHOULD BE (simple and easy to use), and then most likely are going to pump out the innovations that early adopters care about after. The other alt coin devs are going have to play catch up the moment PND is successful at reaching the masses.
I would like to see you reply and see if you can refute how the formula for success in crypto ISNT the following -
1) Build solid foundation to capture as much market share as possible away from the current crypto early adopters, by targetting the average peeps
2) Once foundation is set, refine AND adopt coin technologies THAT MATTER to ensure coin remains relevant later
3) Profit
I watch the posts here, and am starting to see more from this awesome community starting to GET IT. You, VeeMiner my friend, are not one of them.My 2 PND
The slogan of "Rethinking Digital Currencies" is just on the ball and so right.
Edit: Don't get me started on China
