Topic: POLL Is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto? - page 8. (Read 14479 times)
If he is satoshi I will give away all my btc
We don't have any definitive proof that he is Satoshi. Every evidence shown so far could be fabricated with relative ease, leaked mails, blog entry from the past (are there people who saw his blog in 2009?)
Too much questions and not enough solid answers.
Too much questions and not enough solid answers.
Out of jealous rage, Wright murdered Kleiman so he could take credit for the creation of bitcoin!
- you heard it here first
- you heard it here first
I don't think it's him.
Satoshi and a Bitcoin Bank? No that can not be true!!!
But this guy is definitely a interesting person.Maybe an egomaniac who needed attention for whatever reason.
Can't wait to read more stories about his past.
I also would like to know way more about his dead friend Dave Kleimann.
Satoshi and a Bitcoin Bank? No that can not be true!!!
But this guy is definitely a interesting person.Maybe an egomaniac who needed attention for whatever reason.
Can't wait to read more stories about his past.
I also would like to know way more about his dead friend Dave Kleimann.
"Look at me!" -Craig Wright
The dude is clearly a scammer trying to start a Bitcoin bank (dose that sound like SN?) so he can steal everyone's bitcoins, but he got busted for scamming people out of their money and will rot in jail; maybe karma is real.
Edit: Come on guys your better then this!
The dude is clearly a scammer trying to start a Bitcoin bank (dose that sound like SN?) so he can steal everyone's bitcoins, but he got busted for scamming people out of their money and will rot in jail; maybe karma is real.
Edit: Come on guys your better then this!
Waiting for that PGP signature or movement of coins from the first blocks... let me guess, not going to happen.
This guy totally doesn't fit the profile of Satoshi.
This guy totally doesn't fit the profile of Satoshi.
This guy doesn't fit the profile of someone who know one knows and only Gavin Andresen (that we know of publicly) communicated with regularly via email.
What do you know about Satoshi's profile that gives you any insight into his personality or history?
At first yesterday when it first hit the news it seemed to be real, but upon further investigation the supposed proof isn't conclusive enough to simply state that it's satoshi, we could be talking about an elaborate hoax right there.
No, definitely not Satoshi.
No way, does not sound very legit to me.
Waiting for that PGP signature or movement of coins from the first blocks... let me guess, not going to happen.
This guy totally doesn't fit the profile of Satoshi.
This guy totally doesn't fit the profile of Satoshi.
the first block is unspendable, so at best the second
Unspedable, but first block generated coins going to 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
which Satoshi could sign message with if he has private key of this address
Bitcoin Block #0
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f?show_adv=true
Let's all vote for Yes no doubt for the lulz.
Too late, was thinking the same, but we better not create any FUD. Markets are doing great. You believe this community has an effect on the price? 4 years ago, maybe...
Btw, it's China driving BTC in this wave.
I doubt it, I don't believe satoshi is just one person. I believe it's a group of people who came up with bitcoin.
But these are just theories, it's one of these things that I can never say or know for sure.
But these are just theories, it's one of these things that I can never say or know for sure.
Now when you mentioned it, I have to admit that I never thought in this way. This could also be quite possible since the level of innovation in Bitcoin might be quite overwhelming for just one person, we all must admit that.
For the group, it would be much easier to innovate and to think off all these things that were thought off in Bitcoin!
The thing is this Gwern person who broke the story seems to be fairly respected, so for that reason I think there's still a chance.
Hopped back..
to edit out some shit about Gwern,
I like his taste in anime -
like this guy too!
I doubt it, I don't believe satoshi is just one person. I believe it's a group of people who came up with bitcoin.
But these are just theories, it's one of these things that I can never say or know for sure.
But these are just theories, it's one of these things that I can never say or know for sure.
Most likely no, IMO. There are too many warning signs of some kind of a scam attempt (or an attempt to defraud some entity)
this, he have problem with taxes, his solution to handle this situation is bitcoin... there you are, scam written all over itYeah he would seem to have a motive but how exactly would pretending to be Satoshi help with his tax problems? Only thing I can think of is he says don't take my stuff for back taxes, because I have this hoard of bitcoins that I can't access until 2020.
From what I've seen if it isn't him it's one hell of a hoax, then again most of the information is from supposed leaked emails which obviously he could have leaked himself. The thing is this Gwern person who broke the story seems to be fairly respected, so for that reason I think there's still a chance. Too bad for them if it turns out to be a hoax. Sounds like Wired and Gizmodo we're racing to be first and may have cut some corners.
they just raided his house for owing taxes, so probably not
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/dec/09/bitcoin-founder-craig-wrights-home-raided-by-australian-police
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/dec/09/bitcoin-founder-craig-wrights-home-raided-by-australian-police
Let's all vote for Yes no doubt for the lulz.
Too late, was thinking the same, but we better not create any FUD. Markets are doing great.
Let's all vote for Yes no doubt for the lulz.
Not sure why you had to complicate it this much.
Couldn't you just put "yes" and "no"?
Voted "No, no doubt".
Quote
Yes, no doubt - 15 (10.4%)
Probably yes - 42 (29.2%)
Probably nope - 45 (31.3%)
No, no doubt - 42 (29.2%)
Probably yes - 42 (29.2%)
Probably nope - 45 (31.3%)
No, no doubt - 42 (29.2%)
Couldn't you just put "yes" and "no"?
Voted "No, no doubt".
Waiting for that PGP signature or movement of coins from the first blocks... let me guess, not going to happen.
This guy totally doesn't fit the profile of Satoshi.
This guy totally doesn't fit the profile of Satoshi.
the first block is unspendable, so at best the second
Jump to: