I'm against shitcoins and scamcoins.
Voted No
Topic: [POLL] Should Bitcointalk moderate what coins can be posted in the ANN section ? - page 3. (Read 2356 times)
March 26, 2014, 08:53:19 PM
March 26, 2014, 08:47:26 PM
Why are people around here so obsessed with imposing their will on others?
Why do you have such a problem with the free market?
Why do you have such a problem with the free market?
March 26, 2014, 07:51:08 PM
Yes I have put this idea forward before so I support your proposal 100% as long as the alt panel are not scammers.
Would be good to have a mix: 25% Technical (code, algo, innovation etc), 25% investor, 25% miner, 20% marketing, 5% translations on the panel IMO.
It would only really work well if bitocintalk (and maybe cryptocoin talk) shutdown their ANN page and opened up a new altdoor where the panels at,
through which all new coin proposals must pass through first before launching.
Would be good to have a mix: 25% Technical (code, algo, innovation etc), 25% investor, 25% miner, 20% marketing, 5% translations on the panel IMO.
It would only really work well if bitocintalk (and maybe cryptocoin talk) shutdown their ANN page and opened up a new altdoor where the panels at,
through which all new coin proposals must pass through first before launching.
March 26, 2014, 07:22:55 PM
Voting time.
What i am asking here is should some minimum requirements be added for posting a new coin ?
So for example no more scrypt coins can be announced unless they have been reviewed and offer something new.
And would any of you older members here be willing to moderate the ANN section if needed ?
Also would older members here be willing to volunteer their time to be on a panel to inspect and certify new coins ?
For example software and hardware gets reviewed on the internet all the time and they often give a review and an award level.
Like a new graphics card is released and one or more people inspect it and post a review then rate it on a scale say Gold, Silver or Bronze (or what ever)
I like this idea myself and would be willing to help do it but i would want it setup so that no award can be handed out unless it has been reviewed by others
AND we agreed with the majority the coin is approved etc. AND i would only do it if we did it all for free.. no kickbacks, bribes or bounties or fee's !
Off hand i would like say Kelsey, BCX, Zack and many others should be asked to be involved..
these are the kind of people i think that would do an honest and blunt review.
And they have also been showing a LOT of frustration with coin spammers here lately.
Also i think who gets on the panel should be a vote with some panels guys too.
I am not concerned with if i am involved or not i just want to see things improved.
What i have suggested here is in my opinion a constructive way to help improve the situation over all.
So what do you all think ? and please vote too
edit:
Looks like i screwed up the Poll lol
Oh well it should still work anyway.. i am curious what you all think.
So if you think MAYBE ? then i guess click vote for both yes and no.
edit:
For my Poll question i want to clarify that i am not saying how it should be moderated.
If Bitcointalk itself wanted to setup its own criteria for the idea then fine no problem.
Or if you all out there had your own idea for how it should be moderated differently than it is now then great lets hear what ya think..
Who knows maybe staff will see this and one of your comments people and decide to make some kind of change.
I just hope that if some of you have a problem with me you will set that aside and look at what i asked objectively.
I wanted to put it out there and see what you all say / come up with.. This is not a platform to push my own agenda or bicker with you all.
I will try and avoid turning this is into an argument fest lol
Everyone is fully entitled to their own opinions and i value them all.
What i am asking here is should some minimum requirements be added for posting a new coin ?
So for example no more scrypt coins can be announced unless they have been reviewed and offer something new.
And would any of you older members here be willing to moderate the ANN section if needed ?
Also would older members here be willing to volunteer their time to be on a panel to inspect and certify new coins ?
For example software and hardware gets reviewed on the internet all the time and they often give a review and an award level.
Like a new graphics card is released and one or more people inspect it and post a review then rate it on a scale say Gold, Silver or Bronze (or what ever)
I like this idea myself and would be willing to help do it but i would want it setup so that no award can be handed out unless it has been reviewed by others
AND we agreed with the majority the coin is approved etc. AND i would only do it if we did it all for free.. no kickbacks, bribes or bounties or fee's !
Off hand i would like say Kelsey, BCX, Zack and many others should be asked to be involved..
these are the kind of people i think that would do an honest and blunt review.
And they have also been showing a LOT of frustration with coin spammers here lately.
Also i think who gets on the panel should be a vote with some panels guys too.
I am not concerned with if i am involved or not i just want to see things improved.
What i have suggested here is in my opinion a constructive way to help improve the situation over all.
So what do you all think ? and please vote too
edit:
Looks like i screwed up the Poll lol
Oh well it should still work anyway.. i am curious what you all think.
So if you think MAYBE ? then i guess click vote for both yes and no.
edit:
For my Poll question i want to clarify that i am not saying how it should be moderated.
If Bitcointalk itself wanted to setup its own criteria for the idea then fine no problem.
Or if you all out there had your own idea for how it should be moderated differently than it is now then great lets hear what ya think..
Who knows maybe staff will see this and one of your comments people and decide to make some kind of change.
I just hope that if some of you have a problem with me you will set that aside and look at what i asked objectively.
I wanted to put it out there and see what you all say / come up with.. This is not a platform to push my own agenda or bicker with you all.
I will try and avoid turning this is into an argument fest lol
Everyone is fully entitled to their own opinions and i value them all.
Jump to: