amazing - the King of Nasty Og.. maybe it has something to do with him being a prick??
via Imgflip Meme Generator
Topic: [POLL] Should OgNasty be removed as a forum treasurer? (Read 3268 times)
forgot about this one - so it looks like only 50.8% of the community think Og is the man to be treasurer.. lots of people voted that dislike him and quite a few have an issue with his escrow service..
amazing - the King of Nasty Og.. maybe it has something to do with him being a prick??
via Imgflip Meme Generator
amazing - the King of Nasty Og.. maybe it has something to do with him being a prick??
via Imgflip Meme Generator
32/29 OgDogg is still in the lead, but its closer than it was..
must be all the retaliatory Negs he is hitting out with - this bloke is abusing the trust system oh and breaking some serious US Laws..
https://www.amazon.com/Raw-Talent-Mixtape-Various-Artists/dp/B007Q0US0Y
track 18 for all those who are interested.. a few of the fanboys of Nasty will have a laugh that the bloke running the asset sounds like a tool.
must be all the retaliatory Negs he is hitting out with - this bloke is abusing the trust system oh and breaking some serious US Laws..
https://www.amazon.com/Raw-Talent-Mixtape-Various-Artists/dp/B007Q0US0Y
track 18 for all those who are interested.. a few of the fanboys of Nasty will have a laugh that the bloke running the asset sounds like a tool.
Maybe I should be forum treasurer. 
I've never screwed anyone over on a deal and have always, and continue to...take transactions seriously.
I also actually have the time such a position requires.
Every escrow that I've ever done for others has also succeeded.
OGnasty doesn't even have that track record.
I've never screwed anyone over on a deal and have always, and continue to...take transactions seriously.
I also actually have the time such a position requires.
Every escrow that I've ever done for others has also succeeded.
OGnasty doesn't even have that track record.
Since OG is selling loaded coins.....
Theymos is the owner of the forum, so where he puts his money is none of my business.
What the owner says is the rule. If I don't like it, I can go somewhere else
And if theymos say the money stays with OG, then that is where they stay
What the owner says is the rule. If I don't like it, I can go somewhere else
And if theymos say the money stays with OG, then that is where they stay
Theymos == OGnasty
If theymos trusts someone with his funds then I believe we should respect his decision. I believe doing useless polls just because you had a spat with him, does not makes sense. Why did you earlier never complained for the same ? because your relations were good.
Now just because your issues arises we all should join you ?
Plus @ttman you just tried to get more bids by making a false appreciation and acting as two different people, you are lucky you aren't painted dark red as yet. I really have no bad feelings for you and you did just a bad mistake, had you just talked with OG would have solved your issues rather than counter fighting.
Now just because your issues arises we all should join you ?
Plus @ttman you just tried to get more bids by making a false appreciation and acting as two different people, you are lucky you aren't painted dark red as yet. I really have no bad feelings for you and you did just a bad mistake, had you just talked with OG would have solved your issues rather than counter fighting.
Theymos is the owner of the forum, so where he puts his money is none of my business.
What the owner says is the rule. If I don't like it, I can go somewhere else
And if theymos say the money stays with OG, then that is where they stay
What the owner says is the rule. If I don't like it, I can go somewhere else
And if theymos say the money stays with OG, then that is where they stay
Og did NOT agree to let the community decide.... I did the poll anyway, if he had agreed to let the community decide I would not of pushed the point.
this poll now is about the fact he refuses to consider multi sig, the fact I think he is a prized dick isn't the reason for this poll - that is a seperate issue.
3 people have voted that they have had issues with his escrow service (I was not one of them) if Og was the amazing escrow he made out then the poll would be siding a lot heavier with him.
oh - plus you are still a twat...
this poll now is about the fact he refuses to consider multi sig, the fact I think he is a prized dick isn't the reason for this poll - that is a seperate issue.
3 people have voted that they have had issues with his escrow service (I was not one of them) if Og was the amazing escrow he made out then the poll would be siding a lot heavier with him.
oh - plus you are still a twat...
You make no sense. You create a poll to let the community vote who's right. They vote for OG...you ignore it. You create a poll here to let the community vote if OG should be booted. They vote "no" (29 to 12)...you ignore it.
Why do make yourself look so dumb so easily?
I think you are OG. Yeah, that's it. You're OG Nasty's alt. It's the only explanation for your nonsense.
As many of us know he seems slightly unhinged now, his recent spat with me where he refused to allow the community to decide a very simplistic bet.
Oh wait, I remember that argument! That's the one where you created a poll for the community to decide if OG Nasty won a bet with you?
The community voted that he DID win the bet, they voted 26 to 18 in favor of OG Nasty. (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/who-won-the-bet-1946142)
If the community voted that OG Nasty won the bet, why would you use that as a reason why the community should vote against him now? Do you have any actual reasoning or logic or facts that indicate that OG Nasty isn't trustworthy enough to continue to be the treasurer? Has his credibility failed recently or are you just looking to get him relieved of his responsibilities for personal reasons?
Og did NOT agree to let the community decide.... I did the poll anyway, if he had agreed to let the community decide I would not of pushed the point.
this poll now is about the fact he refuses to consider multi sig, the fact I think he is a prized dick isn't the reason for this poll - that is a seperate issue.
3 people have voted that they have had issues with his escrow service (I was not one of them) if Og was the amazing escrow he made out then the poll would be siding a lot heavier with him.
oh - plus you are still a twat...
As many of us know he seems slightly unhinged now, his recent spat with me where he refused to allow the community to decide a very simplistic bet.
Oh wait, I remember that argument! That's the one where you created a poll for the community to decide if OG Nasty won a bet with you?
The community voted that he DID win the bet, they voted 26 to 18 in favor of OG Nasty. (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/who-won-the-bet-1946142)
If the community voted that OG Nasty won the bet, why would you use that as a reason why the community should vote against him now? Do you have any actual reasoning or logic or facts that indicate that OG Nasty isn't trustworthy enough to continue to be the treasurer? Has his credibility failed recently or are you just looking to get him relieved of his responsibilities for personal reasons?
the forums best escrow
Finally, something we can agree on.
Sarcasm cant translate into mongoloid or whatever your native tongue is, leave the jokes to the funny people - stick to your amateur porn empire and flying drones...
actually - I bet you bought the drone to be a perv on your neighbors..
the forums best escrow
Finally, something we can agree on.
that's an insult to better people than you
the forums best escrow
Finally, something we can agree on.
23 votes for Og and 21 against... wow who would of thought that the forums best escrow would be so unpopular?? I would of thought at least 75% for him.. he aint the hot shit he makes out really is he!
Sorry y'all can't look at your posts to respond. No disrespect to peoples opinions. But I'm done this thread is dead.
So the vote has swung back with over 50% wanting OG to be removed as treasurer of the 500BTC of forum funds... surprisingly more people think OG is a dinosaur than there are votes for loving him and his loss making asset..
Steps to creating a biased poll:1. Add double as many options for "yes" as the number of options for "no".
2. Repeatedly use ad hominems throughout the thread and try to mask everything else with ad hominems
3. Imply that by voting "no", you are automatically supporting OGNasty's asset, and that people who run loss making assets are automatically untrustworthy.
4. As soon as the poll is basically 50/50, at least partially made up of people you misled, you show off about it.
You're really not making a good case with this.
I'm not for or against anything.
I try to be impartial...really.
I just want my money back.
Although I have to ask...what does implementing multisig have to do with removing OG as treasurer? Does OG want to be treasurer?
I don't think that's a both or neither situation.
I try to be impartial...really.
I just want my money back.
Although I have to ask...what does implementing multisig have to do with removing OG as treasurer? Does OG want to be treasurer?
I don't think that's a both or neither situation.
So the vote has swung back with over 50% wanting OG to be removed as treasurer of the 500BTC of forum funds... surprisingly more people think OG is a dinosaur than there are votes for loving him and his loss making asset..
I wasn't trying to compare the products (milk to multisig/security/etc), I was comparing the point.
You do not understand the concept that you think you do.Ok so for you - you need to be told No. I would also say, that would be up to the other person whether or not they even wanted to say no/yes. Because again, you are asking something of someone. They don't have to answer.
Again, you are arguing something that nobody claimed/that did not happen. Sure, there are things that I haven't received an answer for (theymos ignores a lot of PMs). In this specific case, multisig is the right way to go.You see, I gotta big problem with anyone or anything trying to force/"suggest" anyone or anything to do something.
Forcing someone to do anything and suggesting that they do something are very different actions.From the response I have read, I understand OP has reasons of making sure the forum purse is deregulated but the way you are going about it, makes its seems a personal vendetta which I am sure quite a number of people are seeing through and for that reason are willingly not supporting and moreover, the poll does not confirms anything if theymos does not support it. It will be a mere academic exercise and test of popularity.
They are both doing things against each other in this "personal vendetta". No surprise there.
Lots of time left on the poll OG and as it's my poll it's my rules, so I'll decide the winner based on fact. Not something that weighs in your favour.. you know like how you are nastyfans as a $ based asset..
Jump to: