Pages:
Author

Topic: [POLL] Should we ban something on the Bitcoin marketplace? (Read 14831 times)

legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1020
Related:

"This topic has been moved to Trashcan, because advertising products or services that are illegal world-wide is not allowed here."
  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5361

Assassination and murder for hire is illegal, for obvious reasons.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
Related:

"This topic has been moved to Trashcan, because advertising products or services that are illegal world-wide is not allowed here."
  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5361
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Quote
If you buy drugs off someone on a public forum you deserve everything you get for being so stupid. It is either a fed honeypot or some other kind of scam.

If some people from the underground source forums start public sites there could be public forums that sell drugs with no feds selling. It is all a matter of screening, not publicity. If one hundred screened people publicly sell drugs on a forum that anyone can access then there is not much risk. A public and free-for-all forum would be a horrible idea though.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
You yelled at me and attempted to boss me around. Now you say you have no idea? Did you just forget that or what?

You consistently fail to answer the questions I put to you, yet I don't yell or get bossy about that failing.

This all stems from the fact that you can't accept the truth about the owners of the government directing the police against alternate currencies. Perhaps some lessons on critical thinking are overdue?

Yeah, whatever.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Nothing important; just look at the poll results for a tl;dr version of this thread.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1020
Um...What people are arguing about?
sr. member
Activity: 661
Merit: 251
...
Anyway, it's nanaimogold that should answer the question. You don't have to.

And you SHOULD NOT attempt to tell me what to do. I am not your fucking secretary.

Jesus, where did all that aggression come from ?
Did i offend you in any way, did I rape your daughter or kill your little kitten ? I mean WTF dude, i just asked a question politely.

I think you just lost a possible customer.


Back in the old days people had to travel to libraries and wait for information to come by mail. You can JUST GOOGLE IT.
(...)
Do YOUR OWN HOMEWORK.

If i wanted to google it, i would just google it.

I didn't want to google it, because i wanted to hear it from you.
It was kind of "what did you mean by this exactly" question.


> I think you just lost a possible customer.

Oh, that's just so typical of the TV audience. You actually believe that's your decision to make.

Consumerist clowns like you need a case study. Ever heard of ING bank? It's popular in places where men are mostly responsible for their actions, where the population is not all soy addled followers of fashion. Anyway, they annually identify the 10% or so of their account holders who cost them the most in support issues and just FIRE THEM.

Sorry, you are too stupid to bank here. Go cost our competition. Thanks!

That concept is just so foreign to you isn't it? The idea that a business would decline to service you - you just can't get you head around that can you?

Wah wah! I am the consumer - I am always right - it says so on my TV. You have to do as I tell you. I am the consumer wah wah!

These are not the people I do business with. Frankly, they have no business to do anyway.


1. I have no idea WTF are you talking about and why the hell you keep attacking me without reason. I don't know, "IS THIS SPARTAAA" or something ?
2. For the record, i haven't watched TV (that includes internet TV) in about 4 years, because I noticed how endlessly manipulative medium it is...


I will simply stop discussing with you, because i don't have a habit of discussion with mad people.


You yelled at me and attempted to boss me around. Now you say you have no idea? Did you just forget that or what?

You consistently fail to answer the questions I put to you, yet I don't yell or get bossy about that failing.

This all stems from the fact that you can't accept the truth about the owners of the government directing the police against alternate currencies. Perhaps some lessons on critical thinking are overdue?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
I will simply stop discussing with you, because i don't have a habit of discussion with mad people.
Really ?  Cheesy

Well, i should watch my words Tongue
However he is way more mad than you are. For once, it is possible to reason with you.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1008
1davout
I will simply stop discussing with you, because i don't have a habit of discussion with mad people.
Really ?  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
You win the wishy washy word-wanking award.

Again, you are the one who said "In principle I don't advocate banning anything, however...". Explain how this does not show that you are willing to compromise your principles?

That's precisely why I never vote in these polls.

For BitterTea to declare that I did vote is annoying however.

Show me where the fuck I said that you did. I love that you keep calling me out for putting words in your mouth when you are the one doing exactly that.

You better stop discussing with him, that man is a lost case.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
...
Anyway, it's nanaimogold that should answer the question. You don't have to.

And you SHOULD NOT attempt to tell me what to do. I am not your fucking secretary.

Jesus, where did all that aggression come from ?
Did i offend you in any way, did I rape your daughter or kill your little kitten ? I mean WTF dude, i just asked a question politely.

I think you just lost a possible customer.


Back in the old days people had to travel to libraries and wait for information to come by mail. You can JUST GOOGLE IT.
(...)
Do YOUR OWN HOMEWORK.

If i wanted to google it, i would just google it.

I didn't want to google it, because i wanted to hear it from you.
It was kind of "what did you mean by this exactly" question.


> I think you just lost a possible customer.

Oh, that's just so typical of the TV audience. You actually believe that's your decision to make.

Consumerist clowns like you need a case study. Ever heard of ING bank? It's popular in places where men are mostly responsible for their actions, where the population is not all soy addled followers of fashion. Anyway, they annually identify the 10% or so of their account holders who cost them the most in support issues and just FIRE THEM.

Sorry, you are too stupid to bank here. Go cost our competition. Thanks!

That concept is just so foreign to you isn't it? The idea that a business would decline to service you - you just can't get you head around that can you?

Wah wah! I am the consumer - I am always right - it says so on my TV. You have to do as I tell you. I am the consumer wah wah!

These are not the people I do business with. Frankly, they have no business to do anyway.


1. I have no idea WTF are you talking about and why the hell you keep attacking me without reason. I don't know, "IS THIS SPARTAAA" or something ?
2. For the record, i haven't watched TV (that includes internet TV) in about 4 years, because I noticed how endlessly manipulative medium it is...


I will simply stop discussing with you, because i don't have a habit of discussion with mad people.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Firstbits.com/1fg4i :)
I would have voted on "don't ban anything that won't result in significant risk of having to put down the forum."
sr. member
Activity: 661
Merit: 251
> Show me where the fuck I said that you did.

Right here;

>> recall you supporting a ban of illegal trades in this forum

Anyway, you have already won the wishy washy word wanking award. I know that changing the subject is classic wanking, and you really do have a flair for it, but it's not necessary because you are already the undisputed champion twister.

> Explain how this does not show that you are willing to compromise your principles?

No. You deserve none. Anyone can use a dictionary. Anything more I can say would only be repeating myself.

It is my principle to not advocate banning anything.

Damn, there goes that repeating myself again.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 252
You win the wishy washy word-wanking award.

Again, you are the one who said "In principle I don't advocate banning anything, however...". Explain how this does not show that you are willing to compromise your principles?

That's precisely why I never vote in these polls.

For BitterTea to declare that I did vote is annoying however.

Show me where the fuck I said that you did. I love that you keep calling me out for putting words in your mouth when you are the one doing exactly that. Between this and it taking a month and a half (so far!) to get my coffee (all while telling me nothing more than "don't worry"), you've ruined your reputation in my eyes. I just want you to know that I will not be doing business with you in the future and I can't recommend that anyone else does either.
sr. member
Activity: 661
Merit: 251
"In principle I don't advocate killing anyone, however I have serious concerns about letting criminals live"

This is nonsense. This is a private forum and we're a bunch of guests. The owner get to do whatever he wants.

That's precisely why I never vote in these polls.

For BitterTea to declare that I did vote is annoying however.

legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1020
"In principle I don't advocate killing anyone, however I have serious concerns about letting criminals live"

This is nonsense. This is a private forum and we're a bunch of guests. The owner get to do whatever he wants.
sr. member
Activity: 661
Merit: 251
In principle I don't advocate for banning anything, however
...
Do you have any principles? Do you just waver on the breeze? On the whim of fashion? Do you stand fast on any issue?

Do you even understand what the word means?

I don't think you're communicating as clearly as you believe you are. Let me give you an example...

"In principle I don't advocate killing anyone, however I have serious concerns about letting criminals live"

Is it clear whether or not I am arguing for or against the killing of criminals?

You win the wishy washy word-wanking award.

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 252
In principle I don't advocate for banning anything, however
...
Do you have any principles? Do you just waver on the breeze? On the whim of fashion? Do you stand fast on any issue?

Do you even understand what the word means?

I don't think you're communicating as clearly as you believe you are. Let me give you an example...

"In principle I don't advocate killing anyone, however I have serious concerns about letting criminals live"

Is it clear whether or not I am arguing for or against the killing of criminals?
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1020
Contempt for your opponents does not help them understand your position.
sr. member
Activity: 661
Merit: 251
See there? Stated in plain English? The first line of my post?

Here, lets quote that yet again, with bold this time:

> In principle I don't advocate for banning anything, however I have serious concerns about advertising contraband on this forum.

It's my PRINCIPLE. How much more rock solid can I state that?

Do you have any principles? Do you just waver on the breeze? On the whim of fashion? Do you stand fast on any issue?

Do you even understand what the word means?
Pages:
Jump to: