Topic: POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana - page 4. (Read 13487 times)
Ithink both bro solana is good but ithink matic also is good soon matic will be 15 usdt soon like solona and ithink next eth will be solana in the next bullrun comming
Solana is now in some trouble , many wallets been hacked but still no fix yet!
For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!
The constant hacking of Solana wallets makes it more vulnerable in investing in Solana, I learnt that the recent hack also targeted accounts that has been inactive for up to six months, imagine thinking that you have your coin saved in a private wallet and eventually you found that you have been hacked. If not for the hacking issue I prefer Solana more than polygon matic. Both coin are strong fundamentally but I think that Solana is more way ahead of matic For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!
Both I use often and both have their own merits and demerits, many other ecosystems or products are built from them, but neither has reached the stage of great success I have observed.
The question is in which way Solana can compete with Bitcoin, this is still far enough to compare Solana with Bitcoin itself
The question is in which way Solana can compete with Bitcoin, this is still far enough to compare Solana with Bitcoin itself
No one is comparing Solana with bitcoins. We are comparing solana with polygon Matic. Although both coins are good one so it is wise to invest in both of the coins to gain maximum benefit.
Also remember, that we should have bitcoin as a major portion of our portfolio.
I tend to prefer POLYGON MATIC because it is a decentralized protocol for building and connecting multiple Ethereum compatible blockchain networks, so many call it “Ethereum’s Internet of blockchain” because it creates a multi-chain ecosystem that can be shared and attached to Ethereum.
but operates separately from Ethereum. It has its own blockchain network and applications.
however, the Polygon Matic app is compatible with the Ethereum network and vice versa.
but operates separately from Ethereum. It has its own blockchain network and applications.
however, the Polygon Matic app is compatible with the Ethereum network and vice versa.
Both have upsides and downsides based on my experience in doing transactions with them. What I like for both MATIC and SOL is that both have extremely cheap transaction fees.
As for the downside, MATIC sometimes is subject to network congestions that would lead to the transaction being delayed either for participating in token sales, buying an NFT, etc. As for Solana, they have numerous network outages from time to time.
So for now, I remained both neutral in both of them.
As for the downside, MATIC sometimes is subject to network congestions that would lead to the transaction being delayed either for participating in token sales, buying an NFT, etc. As for Solana, they have numerous network outages from time to time.
So for now, I remained both neutral in both of them.
We should look more into the cryptocurrency's stability/reliability rather than the features it provides. Despite Solana being extremely fast and cheap to use, it's not a coin you can trust for the long haul because of its unstable Blockchain network. MATIC is a much better option, because it makes a balance between decentralization and scalability. One project worth mentioning here is Avalanche. It's a smart contract platform that's compatible with the EVM (just like MATIC), but takes a different approach to scalability.
I think both AVAX and MATIC are extremely undervalued considering their potential to change the "De-Fi" space for the better. I don't get why Solana is still among the top coins in market cap, after all it's been through since its inception. Constant network outages and hacks would force anyone to get out of the SOL "blockchain" as soon as possible. Yet, whales are "pumping" it for some reason. At least, everything is open-sourced these days. If Solana fails, there's nothing stopping the community from creating a fork that puts decentralization above all else. Just my opinion
POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana
No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several DeFi and NFT protocols.
Polygon had a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.
It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.
But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC
lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.
Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians
Plus ： new NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana
what is your options or opinions?
There are few projects I am really into and they are running on solana, this is what makes me have less zeal for the projects, why solana? I have less confidence on this project because my gut keeps telling me that it could be the next Luna. No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several DeFi and NFT protocols.
Polygon had a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.
It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.
But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC
lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.
Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians
Plus ： new NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana
what is your options or opinions?
Solana in his project development is very good, projects published on the Solana network are also often successful in appearing in the market, no wonder Solana is said to be the best alternative network project under BNB.
Polygon matic is no less good, low cost, simple network because it is similar to ethereum makes it easier for everyone to understand polygon matic wallets.
There's nothing bad between the two, but I prefer Solana, because solana earns a lot for me.
Polygon matic is no less good, low cost, simple network because it is similar to ethereum makes it easier for everyone to understand polygon matic wallets.
There's nothing bad between the two, but I prefer Solana, because solana earns a lot for me.
I think Matic is very convincing, for 2 months up almost 100%, I once bought matic when the price of 42 cents and now the price is around 95 cents and even yesterday it has reached $ 1, I'm sure the August price can be stable at $ 1.
Solana is now in some trouble , many wallets been hacked but still no fix yet!
For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!
For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!
Hacked cases are things that can happen with any wallet, I once lost about $ 2500 from Metamask, and Tron Wallet, after I investigated because I click the link in the telegram discussion, the best and security thing is always lock when it comes out and the best is to save it in Top exchanges and we activate all security features.
Extra security is the best defense. If you do care about your funds, it's always good to go deeper with doing your research to avoid
any possible attacks with your wallet, if you know how to use some extra layer of security, your funds
is safer than those who don't have anything, though hackers are hackers and if they really wanted to
penetrate the chance still open for them. You just need to be more cautious about anything you will do while
inside this business.
Everyone who has spent some time with crypto has probably heard of these two assets. Both assets are fundamentally strong and still have a good position in the current market. Among these two, one is a less price and the other is comparatively high price. I personally think both are suitable for investment. Now if one consider about less investment amount then he can easily invest in Matic or Polygon. There are many new smart contracts being developed. Which will be able to move to a better position in the future.
Hacked cases are things that can happen with any wallet, I once lost about $ 2500 from Metamask, and Tron Wallet, after I investigated because I click the link in the telegram discussion, the best and security thing is always lock when it comes out and the best is to save it in Top exchanges and we activate all security features.
Hacked cases usually if happening with team its self give bad impact with price going dump, but I think what happened with Solana exploit on Slope wallet this mistake not from Solana developer. I think all trader if save their fund on wallet ever get hack, I got twice hacked and loss much money when saving my assets on myetherwallet. I don't think what mistake I made because suddenly loss my fund without connecting yet with my wallet to exchange dapp like Uniswap or other dapp exchange.
Both have upsides and downsides based on my experience in doing transactions with them. What I like for both MATIC and SOL is that both have extremely cheap transaction fees.
As for the downside, MATIC sometimes is subject to network congestions that would lead to the transaction being delayed either for participating in token sales, buying an NFT, etc. As for Solana, they have numerous network outages from time to time.
So for now, I remained both neutral in both of them.
As for the downside, MATIC sometimes is subject to network congestions that would lead to the transaction being delayed either for participating in token sales, buying an NFT, etc. As for Solana, they have numerous network outages from time to time.
So for now, I remained both neutral in both of them.
Solana is now in some trouble , many wallets been hacked but still no fix yet!
For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!
The constant hacking of Solana wallets makes it more vulnerable in investing in Solana, I learnt that the recent hack also targeted accounts that has been inactive for up to six months, imagine thinking that you have your coin saved in a private wallet and eventually you found that you have been hacked. If not for the hacking issue I prefer Solana more than polygon matic. Both coin are strong fundamentally but I think that Solana is more way ahead of matic For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!
According to what I see these two Altcoins are very good to choose, because I see both have very good potential in the future, but if I had to choose, I would choose Matic Polygon because there are many things I like about the Matic Polygon network and also very make it easier for people to transact with very low gas costs.
Both I use often and both have their own merits and demerits, many other ecosystems or products are built from them, but neither has reached the stage of great success I have observed.
The question is in which way Solana can compete with Bitcoin, this is still far enough to compare Solana with Bitcoin itself
The question is in which way Solana can compete with Bitcoin, this is still far enough to compare Solana with Bitcoin itself
Solana is now in some trouble , many wallets been hacked but still no fix yet!
For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!
For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!
For now I prefer MATIC, and happy because I bought around 900 MATIC when the price was around 78 cents and now it's 95 cents even yesterday it passed $1, I'm sure in 2022 the price of MATIC can approach the ATH that ever happened, which was $2.7, a golden opportunity for those of us who want to get big profits by investing MATIC.
In my honest opinion, Matic and Solana are both good long-term holdings, but if you ask me which of the two smart contracts I would use, I would prefer to use Matic compared to Solana, because at least I saw the its features and functions compared to solana. Although I'm not saying that SOL is bad to use, it's because I haven't tried it yet. So I don't feel like using it so far.
But if I were to buy only one of the two, I would still prefer the matic, because its higher and updates development so far is good and I don't see anything bad in what they are planning for their communities. And Matic also has a lot of advantages if I compare him to Solana, and this is a different topic as always.
But if I were to buy only one of the two, I would still prefer the matic, because its higher and updates development so far is good and I don't see anything bad in what they are planning for their communities. And Matic also has a lot of advantages if I compare him to Solana, and this is a different topic as always.
Solona and Matic are included in my portfolio, therefore I won't miss out on these two currencies because they offer distinct things.
It's sad to overlook the immense possibilities of long-term solona and Matic, Because these two coins are very good.
It's sad to overlook the immense possibilities of long-term solona and Matic, Because these two coins are very good.
If you have more money, you should invest in both, both are very promising, neither should be ignored.
But if I could only pick one, I think I would choose Matic over Sol, with polygon I see better growth potential than Sol, their prices are still relatively low so the potential for profit is better. Solana has grown a lot and with the recent incidents, Solana needs a lot of time to regain the community's trust.
Matic remains my current choice. because I heard the news about matic in collaboration with several large companies. so I will start buying it gradually for me to save and hope to get a lot of profit later. I know the risks taken. but I think matic has good potential at the moment.
Jump to: