Pages:
Author

Topic: Ponzi "Game" == Negative Trust? - page 6. (Read 8479 times)

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.
January 16, 2015, 08:33:50 PM
#35
You think the idea of a ponzi "GAME" is new? They were here last year too.

Why are there no long term ponzi games if it so fair and profitable for an operator? But dice sites, casinos, and sportsbook have been in the Bitcoin world for years?

Michaeladair your arguments are weak and your promotions of ponzis is shameful

I dont promote all ponzi games, i just dont believe in leaving negative trust... Also theyre Ponzi Games... GAMES. i
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
January 16, 2015, 08:31:43 PM
#34
You think the idea of a ponzi "GAME" is new? They were here last year too.

Why are there no long term ponzi games if it so fair and profitable for an operator? But dice sites, casinos, and sportsbook have been in the Bitcoin world for years?

Michaeladair your arguments are weak and your promotions of ponzis is shameful
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.
January 16, 2015, 08:30:23 PM
#33

Well Michael, this is the 2nd time you have used your position on the default trust list to try to censor my actions.

I don't see it as censoring your actions at all. He made a valid point.
Look at the trust he left me. Do you think leaving negative trust for ponzi operators is in any way scamming?
[/quote]
I never said you scammed, I left you negative trust because I don't "trust the trust that you leave" its not accurate in my eyes therefore it can't be trusted.
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
January 16, 2015, 08:25:25 PM
#32
Well Michael, this is the 2nd time you have used your position on the default trust list to try to censor my actions.

I don't see it as censoring your actions at all. He made a valid point.
Look at the trust he left me. Do you think leaving negative trust for ponzi operators is in any way scamming?


They can also get screwed if the operator of the game decides he has enough money to make it worth his while to run away with investor money

Thats the case with pretty much any Bitcoin business. Remember mybitcoin.com?[/quote]No that was before my time, but I will trust that they eventually ran away with people's money after being trusted with a lot of it. The point is however any ponzi game will be trusted with a lot of money in a very short amount of time if they act 'honesty' for only a few 'rounds'. It was pointed out in another meta thread somewhat recently that everyone has their breaking point, and ponzi's are designed to attract a lot of money very quickly so the operator's breaking point will quickly be reached
A ponzi is a ponzi. The game is based on building up trust. It works like this, the ponzi operator first either buys up or creates a bunch of newbie accounts to act as their shills. Then then use a mixing service to spread out their own money into various addresses to make it look like each address is coming from a different person. When they start the ponzi game few other people will "invest" however the shills will push the ponzi game and will vouch when they end up winning. This makes it appear that they are trustworthy. The next round a few more people will play along with the shills. The shills will obviously all win and the "real" people will sometimes win but at a lower then expected rate. Their trust is now built up a little more.[ The process continues until the ponzi "game" operator is trusted by various "players" enough so that they control a very large amount of bitcoin at one time.

And you have proof that every single ponzi website on BitcoinTalk goes through this same procedure? Because it seems you are leaving negative trust on EVERY ponzi website. Of course ponzi's have risks and some may be untrustworthy, but I don't think you have investigated all of those websites that you negged enough to know if they are untrustworthy. You were just blindly giving them out to every ponzi site.
No but this is the procedure that the successful ones go though (at least this is what they do from my viewpoint). (this only applies to the bolded part about the shills).

The part about building up trust is what happens. It is how pirate40 was able to run away with so much money (from what I have read), it is how dicebitco.in was able to attract such a large bankroll to steal from. This is what every ponzi site/game did as of last week (and probably not mistakenly, all at the same time)
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1005
January 16, 2015, 08:21:47 PM
#31
It is likely that the ponzi site is going to steal all investor money in one swoop, not over any period of time. The first sign of trouble is that no one received their payout even though some people should. The ponzi "game" would obviously be abandoned and the operator would create a new account to repeat the process.

The skill is to try and determine when the site will stop paying. This may start with obvious signs like late or missed payments, but it may also be when the owner decides the ponzi has gotten to a certain size. So estimating the size of the ponzi funds and the rate it is growing at is is another way to tell. A really skilled player may even decide to invest more funds  when they think the owner is going to close up in order to try and prolong the ponzi.

The ponzi operator will have an unlimited amount of time to launder/mix bitcoin to make it appear that they are not playing against their players. The players on the other hand will have a much shorter time frame to check this. From what I have seen, many people "reinvest" their money back into the ponzi after receiving payouts so seeing money go from the ponzi back into the ponzi would be expected

Well if the owner is using mixers then a skilled player will find out which ones he is using and ignore payments that are tainted by those mixers. And of course they reinvest, you should reinvest if you think it is still likely to pay out.

Point is, not all ponzi's are scams, don't paint them all with the same brush.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.
January 16, 2015, 08:17:54 PM
#30
In an honest game of chance the odds should estimatable by the player, yes.

A ponzi isn't a game of chance, it is more skill based like poker. You need to know which ponzi to "invest" in, get in early and get out at the first sign of trouble and know how to spot signs of trouble too.
It is likely that the ponzi site is going to steal all investor money in one swoop, not over any period of time. The first sign of trouble is that no one received their payout even though some people should. The ponzi "game" would obviously be abandoned and the operator would create a new account to repeat the process.

How could anyone figure out if the operator or his alts was in the queue?
If the operator promised.............lol

Thats like saying how can you figure out your opponents hand in a game of poker. A good ponzi player will use things like blockchain analysis and his experience to try and figure that out, similar to how a poker player uses 'tells' to try and figure out his opponents hand.
The ponzi operator will have an unlimited amount of time to launder/mix bitcoin to make it appear that they are not playing against their players. The players on the other hand will have a much shorter time frame to check this. From what I have seen, many people "reinvest" their money back into the ponzi after receiving payouts so seeing money go from the ponzi back into the ponzi would be expected

You are negative trusting people that have the capactiy to scam! Why aren't you negative trusting Exchanges or other gambling websites?

copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
January 16, 2015, 08:15:53 PM
#29
In an honest game of chance the odds should estimatable by the player, yes.

A ponzi isn't a game of chance, it is more skill based like poker. You need to know which ponzi to "invest" in, get in early and get out at the first sign of trouble and know how to spot signs of trouble too.
It is likely that the ponzi site is going to steal all investor money in one swoop, not over any period of time. The first sign of trouble is that no one received their payout even though some people should. The ponzi "game" would obviously be abandoned and the operator would create a new account to repeat the process.

How could anyone figure out if the operator or his alts was in the queue?
If the operator promised.............lol

Thats like saying how can you figure out your opponents hand in a game of poker. A good ponzi player will use things like blockchain analysis and his experience to try and figure that out, similar to how a poker player uses 'tells' to try and figure out his opponents hand.
The ponzi operator will have an unlimited amount of time to launder/mix bitcoin to make it appear that they are not playing against their players. The players on the other hand will have a much shorter time frame to check this. From what I have seen, many people "reinvest" their money back into the ponzi after receiving payouts so seeing money go from the ponzi back into the ponzi would be expected
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1005
January 16, 2015, 08:13:13 PM
#28
Well Michael, this is the 2nd time you have used your position on the default trust list to try to censor my actions.

I don't see it as censoring your actions at all. He made a valid point.


They can also get screwed if the operator of the game decides he has enough money to make it worth his while to run away with investor money

Thats the case with pretty much any Bitcoin business. Remember mybitcoin.com?

A ponzi is a ponzi. The game is based on building up trust. It works like this, the ponzi operator first either buys up or creates a bunch of newbie accounts to act as their shills. Then then use a mixing service to spread out their own money into various addresses to make it look like each address is coming from a different person. When they start the ponzi game few other people will "invest" however the shills will push the ponzi game and will vouch when they end up winning. This makes it appear that they are trustworthy. The next round a few more people will play along with the shills. The shills will obviously all win and the "real" people will sometimes win but at a lower then expected rate. Their trust is now built up a little more. The process continues until the ponzi "game" operator is trusted by various "players" enough so that they control a very large amount of bitcoin at one time.

And you have proof that every single ponzi website on BitcoinTalk goes through this same procedure? Because it seems you are leaving negative trust on EVERY ponzi website. Of course ponzi's have risks and some may be untrustworthy, but I don't think you have investigated all of those websites that you negged enough to know if they are untrustworthy. You were just blindly giving out negs to every ponzi site.

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.
January 16, 2015, 08:13:07 PM
#27
Any gambling site can run with the money and these sites are just games that are based off ponzis...
True, however ponzi games are designed so that people will trust them with exponentially growing amounts of money after a very short period of time.

All other gambling sites have much slow deposit growth. Also all the gamblers money must be trusted with the ponzi "game's" operator at once while a casino will need to process withdrawals from players throughout the day and if they stop players will obviously stop depositing additional funds there

Most ponzi game sites here automatically send out after 1 confirmation, so the amount in the wallet at one time can be limited.

Anyways, you are giving them negative trust essentially because they have the OPPURTUNITY to scam. That isn't right at all...

Seals with clubs for example probably has a ton of btc in their wallets, why not give them negative trust too? They have a large opportunity to scam.

How silly of me, I didn't even mention the exchanges that have the capacity to haul out millions of dollars worth of bitcoin at will!!! Those guys deserve negative trust, maybe even jail time.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Crypto Knight
January 16, 2015, 08:11:41 PM
#26
Well Michael, this is the 2nd time you have used your position on the default trust list to try to censor my actions.

Are you serious man? You accused me on my thread of scamming for literally no reason and made baseless accusations against me because I suggested the trust system be revised. Note that I am neither positive or negative I am unbiased and made this suggestion because I saw the trust system being abused. And now you get negged and you know what? That's a taste of your own medicine you were making baseless accusations against me now someone has negged you. It's funny how much of a hypocrite you are you were calling me a scammer for asking to revise the trust system now your wining asking for the trust system to be revised because you have been negged. For the record I think Michael was right in giving you negative trust because quickseller you were blindly giving out negative trust to ponzis without using your head.

Justice served
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.
January 16, 2015, 08:10:12 PM
#25
Any gambling site can run with the money and these sites are just games that are based off ponzis...
True, however ponzi games are designed so that people will trust them with exponentially growing amounts of money after a very short period of time.

All other gambling sites have much slow deposit growth. Also all the gamblers money must be trusted with the ponzi "game's" operator at once while a casino will need to process withdrawals from players throughout the day and if they stop players will obviously stop depositing additional funds there

Most ponzi game sites here automatically send out after 1 confirmation, so the amount in the wallet at one time can be limited.

Anyways, you are giving them negative trust essentially because they have the OPPURTUNITY to scam. That isn't right at all...

Seals with clubs for example probably has a ton of btc in their wallets, why not give them negative trust too? They have a large opportunity to scam.
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
January 16, 2015, 08:07:46 PM
#24
Until it can be proved that the operator of the scheme or his alts are not in the queue for payment, a queue that they can both anticipate and manipulate, then players in the "game" cannot possibly know that the returns that are promised are achievable.

In an honest ponzi, the returns should not be guaranteed.

It is up to the players to figure out if the operator is in the queue. Being able to detect such schemes is a skill a good ponzi player should have. If the operator promised he wasn't in the payment queue and later on it was found that he was, then he would be untrustworthy, but if no such promise was made then thats a risk the players take when playing the ponzi.
This should be implied. I cannot in any way see how it would be fair to have a casino betting against their own players. Doing so would be similar to a casino that accepts bankroll investments to play against the house
Fucking poker you dumbass... Poker websites have people betting against players...
The same is true for PvP dice sites. However the operator is not playing against the players (who would have an obvious advantage)
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
January 16, 2015, 08:06:40 PM
#23
Any gambling site can run with the money and these sites are just games that are based off ponzis...
True, however ponzi games are designed so that people will trust them with exponentially growing amounts of money after a very short period of time.

All other gambling sites have much slow deposit growth. Also all the gamblers money must be trusted with the ponzi "game's" operator at once while a casino will need to process withdrawals from players throughout the day and if they stop players will obviously stop depositing additional funds there
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.
January 16, 2015, 08:04:14 PM
#22
Until it can be proved that the operator of the scheme or his alts are not in the queue for payment, a queue that they can both anticipate and manipulate, then players in the "game" cannot possibly know that the returns that are promised are achievable.

In an honest ponzi, the returns should not be guaranteed.

It is up to the players to figure out if the operator is in the queue. Being able to detect such schemes is a skill a good ponzi player should have. If the operator promised he wasn't in the payment queue and later on it was found that he was, then he would be untrustworthy, but if no such promise was made then thats a risk the players take when playing the ponzi.
This should be implied. I cannot in any way see how it would be fair to have a casino betting against their own players. Doing so would be similar to a casino that accepts bankroll investments to play against the house
Fucking poker you dumbass... Poker websites have people betting against players...
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
January 16, 2015, 08:02:58 PM
#21
Until it can be proved that the operator of the scheme or his alts are not in the queue for payment, a queue that they can both anticipate and manipulate, then players in the "game" cannot possibly know that the returns that are promised are achievable.

In an honest ponzi, the returns should not be guaranteed.

It is up to the players to figure out if the operator is in the queue. Being able to detect such schemes is a skill a good ponzi player should have. If the operator promised he wasn't in the payment queue and later on it was found that he was, then he would be untrustworthy, but if no such promise was made then thats a risk the players take when playing the ponzi.
This should be implied. I cannot in any way see how it would be fair to have a casino betting against their own players. Doing so would be similar to a casino that accepts bankroll investments to play against the house
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.
January 16, 2015, 08:02:39 PM
#20
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1005
January 16, 2015, 08:02:30 PM
#19
aren't ponzi schemes illegal anyway?

So are gambling websites that don't have the proper gambling licenses, so are Bitcoin exchanges that do not have the proper money transmitter licenses or AML procedures and so are lenders that don't abide by payday loan laws.
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
January 16, 2015, 08:00:30 PM
#18
Well Michael, this is the 2nd time you have used your position on the default trust list to try to censor my actions.
Okay, so I am confused... I have seen many of these Ponzi "Games" come out that instantaneously gather loads of negative trust. Most of this negative trust is usually given from Quickseller/Redsn0w just to name a few of the major people. I am confused as to why these games are given negative trust?
If you bothered to read my comment, it is because they are running a ponzi
#1: It's a game, even though it is based upon "Ponzi Schemes" these are in no way, a Ponzi.
A ponzi is a ponzi. The game is based on building up trust. It works like this, the ponzi operator first either buys up or creates a bunch of newbie accounts to act as their shills. Then then use a mixing service to spread out their own money into various addresses to make it look like each address is coming from a different person. When they start the ponzi game few other people will "invest" however the shills will push the ponzi game and will vouch when they end up winning. This makes it appear that they are trustworthy. The next round a few more people will play along with the shills. The shills will obviously all win and the "real" people will sometimes win but at a lower then expected rate. Their trust is now built up a little more. The process continues until the ponzi "game" operator is trusted by various "players" enough so that they control a very large amount of bitcoin at one time.

This is very similar to loan confidence scammers as they first take out a .1 BTC loan, then a .2BTC loan when people see they repaid the first loan without problems, the process continues until they can get a very large loan from a sucker and they abandon the account. The difference is that in a ponzi "game" the amounts a user is trusted with will grow much quicker.
#2: People know what they get into when they invest on these sites, they realize that if nobody invests after them then they are fucked.
Not true. They can also get screwed if the operator of the game decides he has enough money to make it worth his while to run away with investor money.
#3: It's a gamble, like any other site: Poker, Dice, Casino... etc.
      Any of those sites have the availability to scam but do not get red flagged.
it is very rare that a dice casino will be created by a brand new user. Also, again their business is generally not one that will be trusted with an massively growing amount of money.
So tell me why people automatically get red flagged for owning a Ponzi Game Site? I believe that if we get rid of this narcissistic negative trusting then the Actual Members behind the sites will come out so that in the case that they do scam, just action can be placed.
See above.
This act just seems kinda stupid in my honest opinion... these sites are games like any other Casino, Dice, or Poker site. I believe that it is the basic name that has been applied to these games that sets off these "Neggers" Alarms; which if they read into the sites they should notice it's just a game.
Duly noted. Thank you.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.
January 16, 2015, 07:58:47 PM
#17
aren't ponzi schemes illegal anyway?
Yes but that is in no way the point of this thread. We are talking about the new Ponzi "Games"... simply based off the style of a Ponzi. People send money to an address and get paid out with a % as new investments come in.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
January 16, 2015, 07:57:35 PM
#16
aren't ponzi schemes illegal anyway?
Pages:
Jump to: