Pages:
Author

Topic: Ponzi world taking over gambling section - page 2. (Read 6223 times)

global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
February 21, 2014, 06:37:04 AM
#34
A lot of ponzi threads have sockpuppet newbie accounts talking to each other, sharing their "payment proof". This can be very misleading.

I think the majority use sock puppet accounts to get the ball rolling and to try provide some "proof" that they actually pay out.

I can confirm that some pay to the end, some pay at first then sca.m (bit4max), almost all stop after 20, 30, 50 or 100 deposits

I'm sure there are a handful that are honest and intend to pay out as long as they can, but most will usually take the money and run at some point, especially when it looks like it's going to fail soon.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
February 21, 2014, 06:27:43 AM
#33
A lot of ponzi threads have sockpuppet newbie accounts talking to each other, sharing their "payment proof". This can be very misleading.

I think the majority use sock puppet accounts to get the ball rolling and to try provide some "proof" that they actually pay out.

I can confirm that some pay to the end, some pay at first then sca.m (bit4max), almost all stop after 20, 30, 50 or 100 deposits
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
February 21, 2014, 05:40:43 AM
#32
A lot of ponzi threads have sockpuppet newbie accounts talking to each other, sharing their "payment proof". This can be very misleading.

I think the majority use sock puppet accounts to get the ball rolling and to try provide some "proof" that they actually pay out.
b!z
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
February 21, 2014, 03:42:07 AM
#31
A lot of ponzi threads have sockpuppet newbie accounts talking to each other, sharing their "payment proof". This can be very misleading.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 522
February 20, 2014, 07:26:35 AM
#30
regardless of the content of the ponzis, they are breaking the "one site per thread" rule by copy-pasting the scams to new domains almost daily. 

I'm all for "games and rounds" housing them all for now also if making a new sub is too hard.
Hmm... I did not notice that! If it's truly the case that they are buying a domain just to bypass the uniqueness rule, then clearly they are violating that rule. I'll look into this.

Good luck.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
February 20, 2014, 07:22:40 AM
#29
regardless of the content of the ponzis, they are breaking the "one site per thread" rule by copy-pasting the scams to new domains almost daily. 

I'm all for "games and rounds" housing them all for now also if making a new sub is too hard.

I dunno how dishostest these ponzis are being, but recently Seals has been hacked at least once. A couple nights ago I tried Seals ring games for the first time in a while and they were dead.

Only so much of this degregation in the Bitcoin gambling scene (because Seals WAS the center) is embarassing.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Need any help ? Just PM me
February 19, 2014, 11:49:59 PM
#28
YES PLEASE GIVE A SUB-FORUM ITS ANNOYING!!!!
Vote for the ponzi section. It will help people think first before enter it
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
February 19, 2014, 07:32:30 PM
#27
regardless of the content of the ponzis, they are breaking the "one site per thread" rule by copy-pasting the scams to new domains almost daily. 

I'm all for "games and rounds" housing them all for now also if making a new sub is too hard.
Hmm... I did not notice that! If it's truly the case that they are buying a domain just to bypass the uniqueness rule, then clearly they are violating that rule. I'll look into this.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
February 19, 2014, 05:15:11 PM
#26
regardless of the content of the ponzis, they are breaking the "one site per thread" rule by copy-pasting the scams to new domains almost daily. 

I'm all for "games and rounds" housing them all for now also if making a new sub is too hard.

That's only if the same owner has posted the same site right? If someone makes a thread to discuss about the thread does that count?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
February 19, 2014, 05:11:23 PM
#25
regardless of the content of the ponzis, they are breaking the "one site per thread" rule by copy-pasting the scams to new domains almost daily. 

I'm all for "games and rounds" housing them all for now also if making a new sub is too hard.

I heard that the script was distributed by someone to many newbies.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1014
FPV Drone Pilot
February 19, 2014, 05:08:38 PM
#24
regardless of the content of the ponzis, they are breaking the "one site per thread" rule by copy-pasting the scams to new domains almost daily. 

I'm all for "games and rounds" housing them all for now also if making a new sub is too hard.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
February 19, 2014, 03:24:45 PM
#23
So Bitcoin Forum has no problems with scams being run on their site. Huh Embarrassed

The rules clearly state that Admins and Mods will not remove likely scams. Apart from Ponzis, there are still plenty scams around.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
February 19, 2014, 02:04:01 PM
#22
So Bitcoin Forum has no problems with scams being run on their site. Huh Embarrassed
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
February 19, 2014, 01:23:19 PM
#21
I do think the Ponzis should have a sub-board in the gambling section. Put a warning saying "SITES MAY SCAM! BE CAUTIOUS!" on it for Newbies.

Only may be? I'd advise stating that it's more than likely a scam or that it's very probable that you'll lose money.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
February 19, 2014, 12:46:15 PM
#20
YES PLEASE GIVE A SUB-FORUM ITS ANNOYING!!!!
hero member
Activity: 584
Merit: 500
February 18, 2014, 06:19:29 PM
#19
I do think the Ponzis should have a sub-board in the gambling section. Put a warning saying "SITES MAY SCAM! BE CAUTIOUS!" on it for Newbies.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
February 18, 2014, 06:05:55 PM
#18
Most this ponzis is marketed as guaranteed money return which is not. We all know that the last depositors would  not see their money again.

I am not a last depositor and I got scammed 0.01 BTC already, by trying one out.

I lost 0.1 (0.15 counting the interests that I should have received if the owner didn't run away with the money (bit4max)

The money ends up or passed through these wallets :

https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1BrjpoTtK9ZnTj8GupJDvKL1sxh1uPMAdP

https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1JdE1cKjhZLXG6jrGZbQCBAZHz25SqD4XJ

Big time sca.mmer
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
February 18, 2014, 05:07:47 PM
#17
Most this ponzis is marketed as guaranteed money return which is not. We all know that the last depositors would  not see their money again.

I am not a last depositor and I got scammed 0.01 BTC already, by trying one out.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
February 18, 2014, 04:58:38 PM
#16
GET RID OF PONZI MOSTLY NEWBIES WITH NEAR OR SAME DATE OF REGISTRATION IM SURE IS ONE PERSON OPERATING THE WHOLE DAMN SCAM!!!!
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Currently held as collateral by monbux
February 18, 2014, 04:21:56 PM
#15
Even more are opening up every day and clogging the site up and most of them don't have replies because people know it's going to end up bad.
Pages:
Jump to: