Topic: [POOL] HASHPOWER.CO - YAAMP CLONE - X11, X13, X15, Quark, Neoscrypt - page 19. (Read 36536 times)

Thanks! I think the transaction fees may now be on the high side. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but a fee of 0.1 mBTC (.0001 BTC) should have been enough for the few-hundred-byte transactions from the pool. The last transaction was sent with a 3 mBTC fee (30x more than was necessary).

It worked, thanks!

Finally found the way to increase tx fees. That was so simple i feel noob for not seeing that before. Anyway, sorry for the delay.

So wallet is :1B6WWKxcY4mTPGyRsGYQwqjLkSvH9EjYVt and I have had over .01 bitcoin balance for days with no payout-  what am I missing?  Thanks

Having trouble connecting to the pool; also, the pool shows no hash rate globally, despite there being miners. Server needs a kick?

AHHHHH...thank you for taking over a pool idea that I have really enjoying mining at. It's great being able to 'pick' your payout coin. Stay with it & I'll stick around.   

Thanks for the update. Miners still pointed your way!

We have loaded up with DigitalCash DASH (DRK) so that in the meantime, we can payout with DASH

Thanks

I disabled payments until all tx are confirmed. I understand if you go mine somewhere else until it's all fixed. In the meantime, I'm trying to understand about how to increase tx fees.

And the old transactions didn't come thru yet.
The fee was really too low.
I've stopped mining here because I'm not sure if I'll get my btcs in the end.
Please speak.

Payments stopped?

Hi Hashpowerco,
Is the x11 pool okay? The average hashing rate since the last block found has been ~180MH/s. The odds of not having found a StartCoin in that period are somewhere between 1% and 4% (depending on what the difficulty during that period has been). Just making sure it's bad luck and nothing more sinister!

Thanks.
Currently I can see the broadcasts but no confirmations.

If both pools use the same yaamp code for payments, I guess we just got out of luck. Our bitcoin wallet might be the problem. We're running 0.10.2 which is the latest build for windows available from bitcoin.org.

We're still investigating and following transactions to make sure everyone gets their payments.

Thanks for pointing to nicehash multialgo examples but i already knew that. The only difference is that nicehash use "f0=?" while on hashpower pass is which algo we are using.. Anyway, just for other users to know i'll post my config file example which seems that it's working on hashpower. This is profit switching between x11,qubit and quark assuming that speed for x11=8Mh/s, Qubit=16 and quark =13.3:

{
"pools" : [
     {
          "name" : "hashpower_x11",
          "url" : "stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533",
          "user" : "your BTC address here",
          "pass" : "x11=8,qubit=16,quark=13.3",
          "algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
          "intensity" : "18",
          "worksize" : "64",
     "gpu-threads" : "2"
     },
     {
          "name" : "hashpower_qubitcoin",
          "url" : "stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733",
          "user" : "your BTC address here",
          "pass" : "x11=8,qubit=16,quark=13.3",
          "algorithm" : "qubitcoin",
          "intensity" : "18",
          "worksize" : "64",
     "gpu-threads" : "2"
     },
     {
          "name" : "hashpower_quark",
          "url" : "stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033",
          "user" : "your BTC address here",
          "pass" : "x11=8,qubit=16,quark=13.3",
          "algorithm" : "quarkcoin",
     "intensity" : "18",
          "worksize" : "64",
     "gpu-threads" : "2"
     }
],
"failover-only" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "300",
"queue" : "0"
}


If you have any suggestions please write a replay. Thanks in advance.

Ooops.

Thanks for running this new pool! Been on for the last two days. Agreed the unconfirmed transactions are a little disconcerting, but so long as hashpowerco will resend in case the transactions disappear, can't complain about 0% fees! Just wish there more miners were here to reduce variance, but what can you do?

Umm, I think you might be on the wrong thread, as this one is Hashpower's...

Otherwise I agree entirely about ffpool; it's working just fine, though perhaps paying out a bit too often. Hashpower's mining seems to be working great too, it's just that payouts in the last >24 hours haven't actually gotten confirmed due to the state of the network at the moment combined with the low tx fees.

I'm not particularly worried about payments taking a few hours to confirm, but when they're taking so long that they're potentially in danger of being dropped from miners' mempools and/or never confirming, that seems like a problem.
[/quote]

I haven't tried hashpower yet, that's another thread, but I have noticed delays with some other pools.
But when you consider it takes most coins 5 hours to mature another few hours isn't a big deal.

I'm pleased with ffpool's fees (lower than yaamp's) and payouts so far. If fees could be lowered by
reducing the payout interval, even better. Every 3 hours is a bit much when only raking in a couple of
mBTC. How about .001 BTC minimum daily and .005 intraday?

Yes, ffpool sends with higher tx fees and their payments have been going out fine. Hashpower, on the other hand, has far lower tx fees, to the point where they're being treated like 0 fee transactions and have gotten buried in the backlog. If they get dropped from miners' mempools, I dunno how the issue will be resolved, but it seems a bit extreme that it's even a possibility.

Example tx from Hashpower; over 24 hours and still not confirmed.

Example tx from ffpool; went through fine around the same time. Notice also how the tx fee is over 100x higher than the Hashpower fee (~14 cents versus Hashpower's ~0.12 cents).

I'm not particularly worried about payments taking a few hours to confirm, but when they're taking so long that they're potentially in danger of being dropped from miners' mempools and/or never confirming, that seems like a problem.