Pages:
Author

Topic: Pool or on your own for a newbie? (Read 1084 times)

newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
June 26, 2013, 06:55:18 AM
#27
I just received notice that my Batch 2 Avalon ASIC has shipped. I need to get up and running on this forum so I can ask questions and get advice, including on whether to pool or mine on my own. I look forward to interacting with all of you.
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
June 26, 2013, 06:16:16 AM
#26
If you are newbie, unless you have lots of mining hardware use a pool.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
June 26, 2013, 06:06:14 AM
#25
What's the best pool for bitcoins you guys recommend, or do they all have pros and cons?
Check the official bitcoin wiki at bitcoin.it. They have a comparison of bigger pools.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
June 25, 2013, 04:10:48 PM
#24
What's the best pool for bitcoins you guys recommend, or do they all have pros and cons?
sr. member
Activity: 404
Merit: 250
June 24, 2013, 06:16:40 AM
#23
pool mining is less risky and has more chance of finding blocks. Smiley
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
June 24, 2013, 05:53:03 AM
#22
What's the best pool for bitcoins you guys recommend, or do they all have pros and cons?
full member
Activity: 176
Merit: 100
June 20, 2013, 10:55:32 PM
#21
Pool mine with the 8 gh/s but once you get the higher gh/s miner you might want to consider solomining if you want to take a risk of not getting anything and orphan blocks if you do get something. Playing it on the safe side and going with an established pool might be a much better option if you want to make a likely return on your investment.

Maybe solo mining might be something you would want to try for a month if you can afford the chance of not receiving anything with your more powerful miner that you will be getting.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 08:58:46 PM
#20
What's the best pool for bitcoins you guys recommend, or do they all have pros and cons?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
June 20, 2013, 10:25:33 AM
#19
Pool's are a lot more easier, and overall simpler to use.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
June 20, 2013, 10:13:23 AM
#18
pool
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
June 20, 2013, 09:59:11 AM
#17
pool
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
June 20, 2013, 09:49:04 AM
#16
I use Pools still to this day. Plenty of great ones out there, wemineltc.com is a good one if your into LTC.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801
June 20, 2013, 09:48:24 AM
#15
So the risk would be mainly in the orphaned blocks, yes? Orphaned meaning they are worthless even though you took your time on it?

That would be one risk. Another would be variance in the time between blocks that you solve. The fact that the "average" with 60 GH/s is currently 1 block every 16 days doesn't guarantee that you'll actually get a block that regularly.  You could be zero blocks for 48 days by which time the difficulty could have already increased on you 4 times (wouldn't that be unlucky?).  You could also be 3 blocks in 21 days and have the difficult only have increased twice by then (now that would be lucky).

If you are pooled mining, none of that matters as much, since you'll get paid for the work your miner does regardless of whether it ever solves a block.  Unfortunately, by reducing the risk of being unlucky and coming out behind the average, pooled mining also reduces the potential profits of being lucky and coming out ahead of the average as well.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801
June 20, 2013, 09:37:12 AM
#14
Yeah, I would stick with a pool for the 8 GH/s, but what about the 60 GH/s?

That'll depend on how soon you manage to acquire 60 GH/s and what the difficulty is by then.

At today's difficulty, that should get you approximately a block every 16 days.  In that case I might be willing to accept the risk of coming up short in exchange for the possibility of coming out ahead.

You'll want to keep an eye in the difficulty and be ready to switch to pool mining if it increases to much.  Perhaps have a pre-determined point that you decide will be the value forcing a switch to pooled mining (anything over 36690000 is going to push your 60 GH/s out the more than a month per block on average).  Perhaps if any two month period goes by and you haven't found at least 2 blocks, then maybe its time to switch to pooled mining.  Personally if the difficulty was over 36690000 when I received a 60 GH/s miner, I probably wouldn't even attempt solo mining and would go straight to pooled mining.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
June 20, 2013, 07:31:53 AM
#13
pool is better
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 05:29:36 AM
#12
Hmm, I might be receiving a 8 GH/s at first, but I want to get a 50 - 60 GH/s one. I have it on preorder. But I have the 8 GH/s one shipping to me now.

Definitely use a pool with 8GH/s. For the 50GH/s you would mine an average of one block a month. Up to you whether you take that risk, but also beware orphaned blocks. I'm watching this thread for a reply to a question about configuration needed to reduce orphans https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/setting-up-solo-mining-238089

So the risk would be mainly in the orphaned blocks, yes? Orphaned meaning they are worthless even though you took your time on it?
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 05:25:40 AM
#11
Should you enter a pool or hash on your own for a newbie with an ASIC miner? Is the bitcoin amount comparable, more, or less? Is Slush's pool good? Are all pools the same pretty much or some better than others?

Thanks!
The answer to your question may depend on several factors, but probably the most important piece of information needed to provide a reasonable answer is what sort of hash rate are you getting with your ASIC?
Hmm, I might be receiving a 8 GH/s at first, but I want to get a 50 - 60 GH/s one. I have it on preorder. But I have the 8 GH/s one shipping to me now.

The calculator I used suggested that at current difficulty factor of 19339258.2724 you'd average a block every 4 months.  Now you could get lucky and get a block in less than 4 months, but you'd be just as likely to get unlucky and not find a block for over 8 months. Meanwhile, as time rolls on difficulty will likely increase, so by the time 8 months rolls around, you might not be looking at an average of 8 months per block and with a bit of bad luck could go over 16 months before solving one.  At that rate, you may not find more than 2 or three blocks before the block reward is cut in half from 25 BTC to 12.5 BTC.

If that is risk you can tolerate, you can consider solo mining with 8 GH/s at least until you see the difficulty get high enough to discourage you, but most people would prefer the steady reliable income of about 6.32 BTC per month than the small chance of 25 BTC in less than 4 months and otherwise 0 bitcoins for longer.


Yeah, I would stick with a pool for the 8 GH/s, but what about the 60 GH/s?
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801
June 20, 2013, 03:46:23 AM
#10
Should you enter a pool or hash on your own for a newbie with an ASIC miner? Is the bitcoin amount comparable, more, or less? Is Slush's pool good? Are all pools the same pretty much or some better than others?

Thanks!
The answer to your question may depend on several factors, but probably the most important piece of information needed to provide a reasonable answer is what sort of hash rate are you getting with your ASIC?
Hmm, I might be receiving a 8 GH/s at first, but I want to get a 50 - 60 GH/s one. I have it on preorder. But I have the 8 GH/s one shipping to me now.

The calculator I used suggested that at current difficulty factor of 19339258.2724 you'd average a block every 4 months.  Now you could get lucky and get a block in less than 4 months, but you'd be just as likely to get unlucky and not find a block for over 8 months. Meanwhile, as time rolls on difficulty will likely increase, so by the time 8 months rolls around, you might not be looking at an average of 8 months per block and with a bit of bad luck could go over 16 months before solving one.  At that rate, you may not find more than 2 or three blocks before the block reward is cut in half from 25 BTC to 12.5 BTC.

If that is risk you can tolerate, you can consider solo mining with 8 GH/s at least until you see the difficulty get high enough to discourage you, but most people would prefer the steady reliable income of about 6.32 BTC per month than the small chance of 25 BTC in less than 4 months and otherwise 0 bitcoins for longer.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
June 20, 2013, 03:12:29 AM
#9
Hmm, I might be receiving a 8 GH/s at first, but I want to get a 50 - 60 GH/s one. I have it on preorder. But I have the 8 GH/s one shipping to me now.

Definitely use a pool with 8GH/s. For the 50GH/s you would mine an average of one block a month. Up to you whether you take that risk, but also beware orphaned blocks. I'm watching this thread for a reply to a question about configuration needed to reduce orphans https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/setting-up-solo-mining-238089
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 02:12:26 AM
#8
Should you enter a pool or hash on your own for a newbie with an ASIC miner? Is the bitcoin amount comparable, more, or less? Is Slush's pool good? Are all pools the same pretty much or some better than others?

Thanks!
The answer to your question may depend on several factors, but probably the most important piece of information needed to provide a reasonable answer is what sort of hash rate are you getting with your ASIC?

Hmm, I might be receiving a 8 GH/s at first, but I want to get a 50 - 60 GH/s one. I have it on preorder. But I have the 8 GH/s one shipping to me now.
Pages:
Jump to: