Topic: Population - page 14. (Read 24069 times)
Campaigns against early marriage in some country, I know of a city where a girl weds at the age of 10, is uncalled for, Abstinence till marriage, Family planning
I am personally in the camp that doesn't believe there is a problem.
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
the one and only solution is we must all be well educated in family planning program. because when we educate family planning program we can easily resolve not to get pregnant years and years go by. What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
the one and only solution is we must all be well educated in family planning program. because when we educate family planning program we can easily resolve not to get pregnant years and years go by. What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
The best solution is to require every nation to have one child policy. We have learned that China suffers from over population according to history.Let's not make the same mistake and learned from what happened thousand years ago. Over population leads to poverty and hunger.If eveyone is aware of that,maybe they can think about it before starting big family. 
if people gave birth only from an overabundance of happiness...and not just because it is "necessary", then all the children would be happy and there would not be overpopulation
What I see here is that parents who are not studying the consequences of having a lot of children are the most difficult times in the future. There are also numerous government programs to familiarize family planing with each family. The problem with many poor families is putting the best things first and not Think about the consequences of these in the future. I can't see great Idea now to control out Populations in this globe.
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
Educate people, make abortions legal and easy, help people to do more safe sex, if peoples life is more interesting without children than we won't make any, so overpopulation won't be a problem.
Also new technologies can make us more capable and therefor population is not going to be a problem in the future.
The best solution to resolve overpopulation is birth control. Because it's the best way to avoid overpopulation.
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
the population is the number of people who live in the place and in my country is over population because the number of people who live in my country is very over and i want to asked to the president to enforced that two child in a family to avoid over population in the philippines
Sekumpulan individu dengan ciri ciri yang sama yang hidup di tempat yang sama dan memiliki kemampuan mereproduksi di antara sesamanya
Education is the key. If people would know more about family planning and responsible parenting, then I believe that it is enough tobsolve the problem of overpopulation.
i think overpopulation is the question that all countries on the world must face, i think they can reduce the overpopulation by using trictly laws one family only have one or two child.
Educating the public is a very impirtant thing to do. Courses on respinsible parenting, discussions, talks and telling people about their responsibilities and consequences if they would have plenty of children can help people realize and think how it would affect their lives.
There is no population problem. There is government leader problem, and people stupidity problem.
The earth has approximately 196,900,000 square miles of surface area ( https://www.universetoday.com/25756/surface-area-of-the-earth/ ). This equals over .026 of a square mile for every man, woman, and child currently alive on earth.
How many square feet is this .026? It's about 724838 square feet. That's like a square area about 851 feet on a side. It equals over 16.5 acres... for every man, woman and child on the earth.
But, you say. A lot of that surface area is water. Who can live on water, like on the oceans? This problem is being solved by the Seasteading company, right now - https://www.seasteading.org/. While they are just starting, right now, the thing they are doing can be expanded as there is need. In addition, if you search for it, you can find other companies and people who have made floating islands.
The neat thing about the Seasteading idea is, out in the ocean depths, skyscrapers could be inverted. In other words, the islands could have hanging living space, that descended under the islands at least several hundred feet, easily... just like buildings are built multiple stories high on land.
In addition to the above, consider Siberia with 5,057,938 square miles and a population of only 36 million. That's only 7 people per square mile. Canada has 3,855,100 square miles with a population of less than 37 million. That is only a few more people to the mile than Siberia.
Now let's consider New York City. NYC has an area of about 302 square miles, and a population of less than 9 million people. The whole United States has an area of 3,794,083 square miles. If you did a population density of NYC on the whole U.S., you could stick 106,787,104,304 people on the land of the United States alone. That's over 14 times the people living on the whole earth right now.
What about food for all those people? Properly used, the oceans could be made into farmlands in all kinds of ways, to easily feed such a large population.
The point is that there is no overpopulation problem by a long shot. All that there is, is governments and wealthy people who are regulating the populations for their own advantage... which includes spreading the idea that there is a population problem. Judging by how many people in this thread think that there is a population problem, I'd say that the population propagandists are succeeding with their propaganda, or they have hired a bunch of trolls to say such. If it's hired trolls, population must be one of the big issues that they are using to control the world.
The earth has approximately 196,900,000 square miles of surface area ( https://www.universetoday.com/25756/surface-area-of-the-earth/ ). This equals over .026 of a square mile for every man, woman, and child currently alive on earth.
How many square feet is this .026? It's about 724838 square feet. That's like a square area about 851 feet on a side. It equals over 16.5 acres... for every man, woman and child on the earth.
But, you say. A lot of that surface area is water. Who can live on water, like on the oceans? This problem is being solved by the Seasteading company, right now - https://www.seasteading.org/. While they are just starting, right now, the thing they are doing can be expanded as there is need. In addition, if you search for it, you can find other companies and people who have made floating islands.
The neat thing about the Seasteading idea is, out in the ocean depths, skyscrapers could be inverted. In other words, the islands could have hanging living space, that descended under the islands at least several hundred feet, easily... just like buildings are built multiple stories high on land.
In addition to the above, consider Siberia with 5,057,938 square miles and a population of only 36 million. That's only 7 people per square mile. Canada has 3,855,100 square miles with a population of less than 37 million. That is only a few more people to the mile than Siberia.
Now let's consider New York City. NYC has an area of about 302 square miles, and a population of less than 9 million people. The whole United States has an area of 3,794,083 square miles. If you did a population density of NYC on the whole U.S., you could stick 106,787,104,304 people on the land of the United States alone. That's over 14 times the people living on the whole earth right now.
What about food for all those people? Properly used, the oceans could be made into farmlands in all kinds of ways, to easily feed such a large population.
The point is that there is no overpopulation problem by a long shot. All that there is, is governments and wealthy people who are regulating the populations for their own advantage... which includes spreading the idea that there is a population problem. Judging by how many people in this thread think that there is a population problem, I'd say that the population propagandists are succeeding with their propaganda, or they have hired a bunch of trolls to say such. If it's hired trolls, population must be one of the big issues that they are using to control the world.
what you have in mind about the future population of the world
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
There is only one basic solution for controlling population that is to reduce birth rate and make some rules regarding that..... 
What is the best solution to resolve our problem in overpopulation?
Populace is the most disturbing issue these days on the planet, Because of expanding at a high rate we can't manage the cost of this populace appropriately particularly at all created nations. We are encountering the lack of sustenance and asylum because of overwhelming rate of populace. Numerous nations can't offer the fundamental human rights to the new age. Giving settlement we are losing our cultivable land, meanwhile we are confronting sustenance emergency. So the high populace ought to be controlled as quickly as time permits we can.What do you think?
The main thing is awareness.We must be aware of the effect of population based on our or other countries and also have to aware others.
There is no simple answer, because if people start to control births, the first result is overaging of population, as it happens in Europe.
Jump to: