Pages:
Author

Topic: PoS vs POW (Which one would you like?) (Read 406 times)

newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
July 17, 2018, 05:32:56 PM
#50
In my opinion it is POS becuase I think it is more user friendly than POW and it also need less power.User can also access for staking because its cryptocurrency is premined.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 555
dont be greedy
July 16, 2018, 10:35:30 PM
#49
I prefer Pow, because POW needs its own capital to be able to get coins, for example we have to buy rig mining equipment to get Bitcoin, and the gain is stable enough
if POS, I consider less challenging, PoS is also at risk of SCAM if the community begins to leave coin related
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
July 16, 2018, 10:27:27 PM
#48
Both POS and POW have their own advantages, but I prefer POS because the POS mechanism does not consume energy.
Although the POW mechanism may be more equitable, the distribution method is more reasonable.
newbie
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
July 16, 2018, 10:06:54 PM
#47
I like POW  because they  pass many years that there project are always on the line each ICOs Sale always  successfully sold out with in on few months only!!  Thats would i like POW!!

What about environment degradation? There were reports regarding usage of fossil fuels
to generate cheap electricity for btc mining.
Which itself is an alarming news and this kind of negative effects will eventually make
people believe that it's not worth it.
you might wanna read up this reporting how miners are causing serious threat for mother nature.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/bitcoin-energy-use-coal-power-cryptocurrency-generation-server-farms-dirty-secret-china-mongolia-a8111666.html
newbie
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
July 16, 2018, 09:54:09 PM
#46
I like POW  because they  pass many years that there project are always on the line each ICOs Sale always  successfully sold out with in on few months only!!  Thats would i like POW!!
newbie
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
July 16, 2018, 09:52:17 PM
#45
Both have their own characteristics. But i think PoS is better than POW. Because i know some of my friend who connects with Pos and they told me this site is good.


Yeah both are good on their own way but POW needs a huge amount of electricity
and the craze making people use more electricity which is being wasted,that's the reason
i don't like this system over POS.
newbie
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
July 16, 2018, 06:40:24 PM
#44
Both have their own characteristics. But i think PoS is better than POW. Because i know some of my friend who connects with Pos and they told me this site is good.
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
WPP ENERGY - BACKED ASSET GREEN ENERGY TOKEN
July 11, 2018, 07:49:22 AM
#43
POS. POW just isn't practical if the coins are going to go main stream, the amount of electric being used is already obscene.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
July 11, 2018, 07:30:08 AM
#42
Very bullish on POS due to the low energy requirement and of course low budget requirement. I have a lot of masternodes up and running and also stake some coins. Its easier compared to mining.
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 524
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
July 10, 2018, 10:50:14 PM
#41
This market now has both POS and POW based projects,and both of them have their own unique characteristics.

POS(Low energy consumption negligible to that of proof of work)
POW(Generation of blocks using computing power)

-Now, as a investor which one is your first choice and why?

-Which one is gonna be the winner in the long run?(I'm bullish on POS though).

 I like the concept of Proof of Work, its more rewarding. Miners earn more with the consensus Algorithm.  Proof of work rewards  automatically and requires non smart contracts protocols
But you need a very big electricity and big mining rig to be profitable. PoW will become out of date system.  Remember this is almost 10 year from the bitcoin's first mining and it has been consuming 0.1 electricity from the total electricity consume around the world.
jr. member
Activity: 31
Merit: 6
July 10, 2018, 10:40:27 PM
#40
They're both good and bad. PoW makes it easier to centralize mining power, so it can be a lot less efficient as a sybil protection measure but PoS faces a similar problem as well. PoS can be good if the team holds none of their own tokens, or nearly none(which is never or almost never that case with these projects as most of them are simply pump and dump money makers for the teams). And as long as the tokens are well distributed without a large concentration of tokens in one wallet. They can both be relatively power efficient depending on the consensus algorithm used, but PoS has an advantage in general.
newbie
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
July 10, 2018, 10:25:30 PM
#39
POS is better dont need to  spend any money for Mining-RIG

Exactly those mining rigs are pretty expensive and nearly impossible for the people starting for the first time.
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
July 08, 2018, 08:23:14 AM
#38
POS is better dont need to  spend any money for Mining-RIG
newbie
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
July 07, 2018, 06:14:05 AM
#37
This market now has both POS and POW based projects,and both of them have their own unique characteristics.

POS(Low energy consumption negligible to that of proof of work)
POW(Generation of blocks using computing power)

-Now, as a investor which one is your first choice and why?

-Which one is gonna be the winner in the long run?(I'm bullish on POS though).

 I like the concept of Proof of Work, its more rewarding. Miners earn more with the consensus Algorithm.  Proof of work rewards  automatically and requires non smart contracts protocols
full member
Activity: 616
Merit: 102
July 07, 2018, 06:03:44 AM
#36
It's obvious that POS is better. POS might also increase the price of a token/coin because it increase demands for the coin, to be stake. Now I have tried to accumulate one altcoin to be use for staking in the future.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
July 05, 2018, 09:12:42 PM
#35
PoS is better because it consume less electricity.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 250
“A nexgen decentralized ride hailing ”
July 05, 2018, 09:07:48 AM
#34
Both are good in their production, in one case, the equipment necessary, in the other it is necessary to invest. Everyone choose their
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 103
July 05, 2018, 08:44:13 AM
#33
Personally, I believe that the most secure solution for the future is PoS and PoW systems. However, this is already the most common approach. Many crypto currencies have a PoW stage, when the currency is issued through the payment to miners of new coins, and the PoS stage that comes after all the currency was released. Probably, most serious crypto currency will not abandon PoW - the mentality of Nothing-at-Stake is firmly in the heads of experts on crypto-currencies. However, PoS-systems will always be easier to implement and in addition to reliable in terms of security, as well as PoW-systems.
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
InvestnTrade. Latest from the crypto space.
July 05, 2018, 08:29:26 AM
#32
Very bullish on POS due to the low energy requirement and of course low budget requirement. I have a lot of masternodes up and running and also stake some coins. Its easier compared to mining.
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
July 05, 2018, 08:21:46 AM
#31
In my opinion Proof of Stake has more chances. It is something closer to the human of future. Also it is a little bit more ecologically. So in logterm pos have all chances to beat pow. But not Bitcoin Grin
Pages:
Jump to: